Abstract
Assessment has witnessed a great transformation in the past decade or so because it is considered an integral part of the instructional process. This transformation has recognized the impact of such factors as ethicality and professionalism on assessment and test performance. This chapter aims to critically analyse the effect of language assessment literacy in alternative assessment on the ethicality of English language assessment practices among Kurdish tertiary EFL teachers. After discussing concepts related to alternative assessment, the chapter provides a description of the current assessment situation in some Kurdistan Region English departments and then it discusses the level of Kurdish EFL teachers’ assessment literacy in alternative assessment and how that influences their assessment practices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alderson, J. C., & Banerjee, J. (2002). Language testing and assessment (Part 1). Language Teaching, 35(2), 79–113.
Atac, B. A. (2012). Foreign language teachers’ attitude toward authentic assessment in language teaching. Journal of Language & Linguistics Studies, 8(2), 7–19.
Bachman, L. F. (2005). Building and supporting a case for test use. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal, 2(1), 1–34.
Bachman, L. F. (2007). Language assessment: Opportunities and challenges. Paper Presented at Meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics (AAAL), Costa Mesa, CA.
Brown, T., & Jones, L. (2001). Action research and postmodernism, congruence and critique. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Brumfit, C. J., & Johnson, K. (Eds.). (1979). The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chandella, N., & Troudi, S. (2013). Critical pedagogy in language education: Challenges and potentials. In R. Akbari & C. Coombe (Eds.), Middle East handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 42–61). Dubai: TESOL Arabia Publications.
Coombe, C., Troudi, S., & Al-Hamly, M. (2012). Foreign and second language teacher assessment literacy: Issues, challenges, and commendations. In C. Coombe, S. Stoynoff, B. O’Sullivan, & P. Davidson (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language assessment (pp. 20–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cummins, P. W., & Davesne, C. (2009). Using electronic portfolios for second language assessment. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 848–867.
Dai Quang, V. (2007). Critical applied linguistics: Concerns and domains. Hanoi: Scientific Research Management Office, College of Foreign Languages—VNU.
EALTA Executive Committee. (2006). EALTA guidelines for good practice in language testing and assessment. Retrieved from http://www.ealta.eu.org/guidelines.htm.
Earl, L. M., & Katz, M. S. (2006). Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind: Assessment for learning, assessment as learning, assessment of learning. Manitoba: Manitoba Education, Citizenship & Youth.
Hamp-Lyons, L. (2001). Ethics, fairness(es) and developments in language testing. In Elder, C., Brown, A., Grove, E., Hill, K. Iwashita, N., Lumley, T., & O’Loughlin, K. (Eds.), Experimenting with uncertainty: Essays in honour of Alan Davies (pp. 222–227). New York. Cambridge University Press.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 6(2), 151–182.
Garcia, E., Lawton, K., & Diniz de Figueiredo, E. H. (2010). Assessment of young English language learners in Arizona: Questioning the validity of the state measure of English proficiency. Los Angeles: Civil Rights Project.
Jia, Y. (2009). Ethical Standards for language testing professionals: An introduction to five major codes. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 13(2), 2–8.
Lynch, B. K. (1997). In search of the ethical test. Language Testing, 14(3), 315–327.
Lynch, B. K., & Shaw, P. (2005). Portfolios, power, and ethics. TESOL Quarterly, 39(2), 263–297.
Mahboob, A., & Tilakaratna, N. (2012). A principles-based approach for English language teaching policies and practices. Alexandria, VA: TESOL International Association.
McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Newfields, T. (2006). Teacher development and assessment literacy. Proceedings of the 5th Annual JALT Pan-SIG Conference (pp. 48–73). JALT: Tokyo.
Piggin, G. (2012). What are our tools really made out of? A critical assessment of recent models of language proficiency. Polyglossia, 22, 79–87.
Pitoniak, M. J., Young, J. W., Martiniello, M., King, T. C., Buteux, A., & Ginsburgh, M. (2009). Guidelines for the assessment of English language learners. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research. London: SAGE Publications.
Riasati, M. J., & Mollaei, F. (2012). Critical pedagogy and language learning. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(21), 223–229.
Ripley, D. (2012). Implementing portfolio-based language assessment in LINC programs: Benefits and challenges. TESL Canada Journal, 30(1), 69–86.
Shohamy, E. G. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. New York: Pearson Education.
Short, D. J. (2000). The ESL standards: Bridging the academic gap for English language learners. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics (ED447728).
Stephenson, A., Johnson, P. D., Jorgensen, M. A., & Young, M. J. (2003). Assessing English language proficiency: Using valid results to optimize instruction. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
Stoynoff, S. J. (2008). Developments in English language assessment APEC strategic plan for english and other languages. Mankato: APEC Human Resources Development Working Group, Minnesota State University.
TESOL International Association. (2010). TESOL/NCATE standards for the recognition of initial TESOL programs in P-12 ESL teacher education. Retrieved from http://www.tesol.org/docs/books/the-revised-tesol-ncate-standards-for-the-recognition-of-initial-tesol-programs-in-p-12-esl-teacher-education-(2010-pdf).pdf?sfvrsn=0.
Thibeault, C. H., Kuhlman, N., & Day, C. (2010). ESL teacher-education programs: Measuring up to the TESOL/NCATE yardstick. CATESOL Journal, 22(1), 48–59.
Troudi, S., Coombe, C., & Al-Hamly, M. (2009). EFL teachers’ views of English language assessment in higher education in the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 546–555.
Tsagari, D. (2004). Is there life beyond language testing? An introduction to alternative language assessment. Center for Research in Language Education, CRILE Working Papers, 58. Retrieved from http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/groups/crile/docs/crile58tsagari.pdf.
Winke, P. (2011). Evaluating the validity of a high-stakes ESL test: Why teachers’ perceptions matter. TESOL Quarterly, 45(4), 628–660.
Wolf, M. K., Herman, J. L., Bachman, L. F., Bailey, A. L. & Griffin, N. (2008). Recommendations for assessing English language learners: English language proficiency measures and accommodation uses (Part 3 of 3). CRESST Report 732. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ismael, D.A. (2017). Kurdish Tertiary EFL Teachers’ Assessment Literacy in Alternative Assessments and Its Influence on the Ethicality of Their Assessments. In: Al-Mahrooqi, R., Coombe, C., Al-Maamari, F., Thakur, V. (eds) Revisiting EFL Assessment. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32601-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32601-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32599-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32601-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)