Skip to main content

Kurdish Tertiary EFL Teachers’ Assessment Literacy in Alternative Assessments and Its Influence on the Ethicality of Their Assessments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

Abstract

Assessment has witnessed a great transformation in the past decade or so because it is considered an integral part of the instructional process. This transformation has recognized the impact of such factors as ethicality and professionalism on assessment and test performance. This chapter aims to critically analyse the effect of language assessment literacy in alternative assessment on the ethicality of English language assessment practices among Kurdish tertiary EFL teachers. After discussing concepts related to alternative assessment, the chapter provides a description of the current assessment situation in some Kurdistan Region English departments and then it discusses the level of Kurdish EFL teachers’ assessment literacy in alternative assessment and how that influences their assessment practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alderson, J. C., & Banerjee, J. (2002). Language testing and assessment (Part 1). Language Teaching, 35(2), 79–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atac, B. A. (2012). Foreign language teachers’ attitude toward authentic assessment in language teaching. Journal of Language & Linguistics Studies, 8(2), 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L. F. (2005). Building and supporting a case for test use. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal, 2(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L. F. (2007). Language assessment: Opportunities and challenges. Paper Presented at Meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics (AAAL), Costa Mesa, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & Jones, L. (2001). Action research and postmodernism, congruence and critique. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfit, C. J., & Johnson, K. (Eds.). (1979). The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandella, N., & Troudi, S. (2013). Critical pedagogy in language education: Challenges and potentials. In R. Akbari & C. Coombe (Eds.), Middle East handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 42–61). Dubai: TESOL Arabia Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombe, C., Troudi, S., & Al-Hamly, M. (2012). Foreign and second language teacher assessment literacy: Issues, challenges, and commendations. In C. Coombe, S. Stoynoff, B. O’Sullivan, & P. Davidson (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language assessment (pp. 20–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, P. W., & Davesne, C. (2009). Using electronic portfolios for second language assessment. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 848–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai Quang, V. (2007). Critical applied linguistics: Concerns and domains. Hanoi: Scientific Research Management Office, College of Foreign Languages—VNU.

    Google Scholar 

  • EALTA Executive Committee. (2006). EALTA guidelines for good practice in language testing and assessment. Retrieved from http://www.ealta.eu.org/guidelines.htm.

  • Earl, L. M., & Katz, M. S. (2006). Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind: Assessment for learning, assessment as learning, assessment of learning. Manitoba: Manitoba Education, Citizenship & Youth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamp-Lyons, L. (2001). Ethics, fairness(es) and developments in language testing. In Elder, C., Brown, A., Grove, E., Hill, K. Iwashita, N., Lumley, T., & O’Loughlin, K. (Eds.), Experimenting with uncertainty: Essays in honour of Alan Davies (pp. 222–227). New York. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 6(2), 151–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, E., Lawton, K., & Diniz de Figueiredo, E. H. (2010). Assessment of young English language learners in Arizona: Questioning the validity of the state measure of English proficiency. Los Angeles: Civil Rights Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia, Y. (2009). Ethical Standards for language testing professionals: An introduction to five major codes. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 13(2), 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, B. K. (1997). In search of the ethical test. Language Testing, 14(3), 315–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, B. K., & Shaw, P. (2005). Portfolios, power, and ethics. TESOL Quarterly, 39(2), 263–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahboob, A., & Tilakaratna, N. (2012). A principles-based approach for English language teaching policies and practices. Alexandria, VA: TESOL International Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newfields, T. (2006). Teacher development and assessment literacy. Proceedings of the 5th Annual JALT Pan-SIG Conference (pp. 48–73). JALT: Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piggin, G. (2012). What are our tools really made out of? A critical assessment of recent models of language proficiency. Polyglossia, 22, 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitoniak, M. J., Young, J. W., Martiniello, M., King, T. C., Buteux, A., & Ginsburgh, M. (2009). Guidelines for the assessment of English language learners. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riasati, M. J., & Mollaei, F. (2012). Critical pedagogy and language learning. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(21), 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, D. (2012). Implementing portfolio-based language assessment in LINC programs: Benefits and challenges. TESL Canada Journal, 30(1), 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. G. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. New York: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, D. J. (2000). The ESL standards: Bridging the academic gap for English language learners. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics (ED447728).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, A., Johnson, P. D., Jorgensen, M. A., & Young, M. J. (2003). Assessing English language proficiency: Using valid results to optimize instruction. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoynoff, S. J. (2008). Developments in English language assessment APEC strategic plan for english and other languages. Mankato: APEC Human Resources Development Working Group, Minnesota State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • TESOL International Association. (2010). TESOL/NCATE standards for the recognition of initial TESOL programs in P-12 ESL teacher education. Retrieved from http://www.tesol.org/docs/books/the-revised-tesol-ncate-standards-for-the-recognition-of-initial-tesol-programs-in-p-12-esl-teacher-education-(2010-pdf).pdf?sfvrsn=0.

  • Thibeault, C. H., Kuhlman, N., & Day, C. (2010). ESL teacher-education programs: Measuring up to the TESOL/NCATE yardstick. CATESOL Journal, 22(1), 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troudi, S., Coombe, C., & Al-Hamly, M. (2009). EFL teachers’ views of English language assessment in higher education in the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 546–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsagari, D. (2004). Is there life beyond language testing? An introduction to alternative language assessment. Center for Research in Language Education, CRILE Working Papers, 58. Retrieved from http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/groups/crile/docs/crile58tsagari.pdf.

  • Winke, P. (2011). Evaluating the validity of a high-stakes ESL test: Why teachers’ perceptions matter. TESOL Quarterly, 45(4), 628–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. K., Herman, J. L., Bachman, L. F., Bailey, A. L. & Griffin, N. (2008). Recommendations for assessing English language learners: English language proficiency measures and accommodation uses (Part 3 of 3). CRESST Report 732. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dler Abdullah Ismael .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ismael, D.A. (2017). Kurdish Tertiary EFL Teachers’ Assessment Literacy in Alternative Assessments and Its Influence on the Ethicality of Their Assessments. In: Al-Mahrooqi, R., Coombe, C., Al-Maamari, F., Thakur, V. (eds) Revisiting EFL Assessment. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32601-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32601-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32599-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32601-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics