Advertisement

Theoretical Perspectives on Visual Political Communication Through Election Posters

  • Stephanie Geise
Chapter

Abstract

While posters have always been a medium of “flash communication” transferring textually and/or pictorially highly condensed information, and actualizing political issues and actors, they provide a vivid insight into historical as well as contemporary political culture and communication and their potential effects on audiences. Though, systematically analyzing and evaluating election posters should be informed by a profound theoretical grounding. Understanding the election poster as a specific, well-established medium of visual political communication, this chapter provides an overview of central theoretical approaches that can fruitfully be applied to the understanding and examination of election posters. Ranging from (1) historical/art historical, (2) political, (3) critical as well as (4) sociopsychological approaches to a (5) media-effect perspective, the latter chapter outlines a theoretical model for empirically analyzing the reception of visual political communication through election posters, translating central steps during poster perception, processing, and evaluation into a practical research framework.

Keywords

Visual Attention Poster Reception Political Poster Political Communication Election Campaign 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andén-Papadopoulos, K. (2008). The Abu Ghraib torture photographs. News frames, visual culture, and the power of images. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 9(1), 5–30.Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett, F. C. (1967). Remembering. A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bohrmann, H. (Ed.). (1984). Politische Plakate. Dortmund: Harenberg.Google Scholar
  4. Brader, T. (2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds. How emotional appeals in political ads work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brosius, H.-B., Holicki, S., & Hartmann, T. (1987). Einfluss der Gestaltungsmerkmale von Wahlplakaten auf Personenwahrnehmung und Kompetenzzuschreibung. Publizistik, 32(3), 338–353.Google Scholar
  6. Bundesen, C., & Habekost, T. (2008). Principles of visual attention: Linking mind and brain. Oxford Portraits in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter, R. H. (1991). Eye movements. Vision and visual dysfunction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  8. Childers, T. L., Heckler, S. E., & Houston, M. J. (1986). Memory for the visual and verbal components of print advertisements. Psychology and Marketing, 3, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Childers, T. L., & Houston, M. J. (1984). Conditions for a picture superiority effect on consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(2), 643–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dijksterhuis, A., Aarts, H., & Smith, P. K. (2005). The power of the subliminal: On subliminal persuasion and other potential applications. In R. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 77–106). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dumitrescu, D. (2010). Know me, love me, fear me: The anatomy of candidate poster designs in the 2007 French legislative elections. Political Communication, 27(1), 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallo, M. (2002). The posters in history. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  14. Geise, S. (2011a). Vision that matters. Die Wirkungs- und Funktionslogik Visueller Politischer Kommunikation am Beispiel des Wahlplakats. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  15. Geise, S. (2011b). Eyetracking in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft: Theorie, Methode und kritische Reflexion. SCM: Studies in Communication and Media, 2, 149–263.Google Scholar
  16. Geise, S. (2014). Visuelle Wahlkampfkommunikation, Framing und Priming. In F. Marcinkowski (Ed.), Framing als Politischer Prozess. Beiträge zum Deutungskampf in der Politischen Kommunikation (pp. 211–230). Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geise, S. (2016). Posters, political. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication (published online: 4 Jan 2016, doi:  10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc028). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  18. Geise, S., & Brettschneider, F. (2010). Die Wahrnehmung und Bewertung von Wahlplakaten. Ergebnisse einer Eyetracking-Studie. In T. Faas, K. Arzheimer, & S. Roßteutscher (Eds.), Information, Wahrnehmung, Emotion. Politische Psychologie in der Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung. Schriftenreihe des Arbeitskreises „Wahlen und politische Einstellungen“ der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politische Wissenschaft (DVPW) (pp. 71–96). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  19. Geise, S., & Leidecker, M. (2015). (Visuelle) Wahlkampfstrategien in der Plakatkommunikation zur Bundestagswahl 2013. Zeitschrift für Politikberatung, 7(1–2), 14–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerbaudo, P. (2013). Spikey posters: Street media and territoriality in urban activist scenes. Space and Culture, 17(3), 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. GLES. (2014). Homepage of the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES). Accessed 03.03.2015, from http://gles.eu/wordpress/english/.
  22. Goldstein, B. E., & Fink, S. I. (1981). Selective attention in vision: Recognition memory for superimposed line drawings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 954–967.Google Scholar
  23. Gregory, G. H. (1993). Posters of world war II. New York: Gramercy.Google Scholar
  24. Haiman, F. (1991). Tale of two countries: Media and messages of the 1988 French and American presidencial campaigns. In L. L. Kaid, J. Gerstlé, & K. Sanders (Eds.), Mediated campaigning in the United States and France (pp. 59–72). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  25. Holtz-Bacha, C. (1996). Massenmedien und Wahlen. Zum Stand der deutschen Forschung. Befunde und Desiderata. In C. Holtz-Bacha & L. L. Kaid (Eds.), Wahlen und Wahlkampf in den Medien. Untersuchungen aus dem Wahljahr 1994 (pp. 9–44). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  26. Holtz-Bacha, C. (2006). Personalisiert und emotional. Strategien des modernen Wahlkampfes. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 7, 11–19.Google Scholar
  27. Holtz-Bacha, C., & Lessinger, E.-M. (2010). Auge in Auge mit Kandidatinnen und Kandidaten. Emotionale Reaktionen auf Politikerplakate. In C. Holtz-Bacha (Ed.), Die Massenmedien im Wahlkampf 2009 (pp. 140–165). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. (1987). News that matters. Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. James, P. (Ed.). (2009). Picture this: World War I posters and visual culture. Baskerville: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  30. Jenkins, M., & Harris, L. (Eds.). (2001). Vision and attention. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  31. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8(4), 441–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading. From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kamps, E. (1999). Plakat. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kroeber-Riel, W. (1993). Bildkommunikation. The new science of imagination. München: Vahlen.Google Scholar
  35. Kroeber-Riel, W., & Esch, F.-R. (2004). Strategie und Technik der Werbung. Verhaltenswissenschaftliche Ansätze. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  36. Kroeber-Riel, W., Weinberg, P., & Gröppel-Klein, A. (2008). Konsumentenverhalten. Stuttgart: Vahlen.Google Scholar
  37. Lessinger, E.-M., & Moke, M. (1999). «Ohne uns schnappt jeder Kanzler über…» Eine Studie zur Rezeption von Plakatwahlwerbung im Bundestagswahlkampf 1998. In C. Holtz-Bacha (Ed.), Wahlkampf in den Medien—Wahlkampf mit den Medien. Ein Reader zum Wahljahr 1998 (pp. 242–262). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  38. Lessinger, E.-M., Moke, M., & Holtz-Bacha, C. (2003). «Edmund, Essen ist fertig». Plakatwahlkampf 2002. Motive und Strategien. In C. Holtz-Bacha (Ed.), Die Massenmedien im Wahlkampf. Die Bundestagswahl 2002 (pp. 216–242). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  39. Mitchell, T. W. (1987). Iconology: Image, text, ideology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Müller, M. G. (1997). Politische Bildstrategien im amerikanischen Präsidentschaftswahlkampf 1828–1996. Berlin: Akademischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  41. Müller, M. G. (2007). Posters, political. In L. L. Kaid & C. Holtz-Bacha (Eds.), Encyclopedia of political communication (pp. 626–630). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Negrine, R., & Lilleker, D. G. (2002). The professionalization of political communication: Continuities and change in media practices. European Journal of Communication, 17(3), 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nelson, D. L., Reed, V. S., & Walling, J. R. (1976). Pictorial superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 523–528.Google Scholar
  44. Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ottati, V. C., & Deiger, M. (2002). Visual cues and the candidate evaluation process. In V. C. Ottati, R. S. Tindale, J. Edwards, F. B. Bryant, D. C. O’Connell, Y. Suarez-Balzacar, & E. J. Posavac (Eds.), The social psychology of politics (pp. 75–88). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Paivio, A. (1991). Images in mind. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  47. Panofsky, E. (1955/1982). Meaning in the visual arts. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Paul, G. (2006). Visual History. Ein Studienbuch. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  49. Pearl, J. (2009). Picture this: World War I posters and visual culture. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  50. Podschuweit, N. (2007). Wirkungen von Wahlwerbung. Aufmerksamkeitsstärke, Verarbeitung, Erinnerungsleistung und Entscheidungsrelevanz. München: Fischer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rahat, G., & Sheafer, T. (2007). The personalization(s) of politics: Israel, 1949–2003. Political Communication, 24(1), 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sauer, M. S. (2006). “Hinweg damit!” Plakate als historische Quellen zur Politik- und Mentalitätsgeschichte. In G. Paul (Ed.), Visual History. Ein Studienbuch (pp. 37–56). Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht: Göttingen.Google Scholar
  53. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
  54. Seidman, S. (2008). Posters, propaganda and persuasion in election campaigns around the world and through history. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  55. Semetko, H., & Schönbach, K. (1994). Germany’s unity election. Voters and the media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  56. Solso, R. L., Maclin, O. H., & Maclin, K. M. (2008). Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hill.Google Scholar
  57. Sontag, S. (1970). Posters: Advertisement, art, political artifact, commodity. In D. Stermer (Ed.), The art of revolution: 96 Posters from Castro’s Cuba: 1959–1970 (n.p.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  58. Uleman, J. S., Blader, S. L., & Todorov, A. (2005). Implicit impressions. In R. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 362–392). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Van Zoonen, E. A. (2005). Entertaining the citizen: When politics and popular culture converge. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  60. Vliegenthart, R. (2012). The professionalization of political communication? A longitudinal analysis of Dutch election campaign posters. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(2), 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Westfälische-Wilhelms-Universität MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations