Abstract
This self-study examines the extent to which relational pedagogy could be used as a means for sharing authority between instructor and students in an undergraduate science course required for elementary education majors. The purpose of this self-study was to examine personal assumptions about relational pedagogy – specifically, that relational pedagogy serves as a means for confronting the constraining regularities of a normative, homogenized science curriculum. Through this self-study, we explored how to enact relational pedagogy in ways that engaged students in meaningful discourse within scientific inquiry. Self-study methodology was appropriate to this study as our intention was to investigate and interrogate the alignment between personal assumptions and classroom practice, and to collaborate with students in doing so. Data were analyzed in two phases using thematic analysis. Findings indicate the potential for using feedback from students to shape the content and pacing of course curricula and providing meaningful opportunities to engage in science inquiry. However, negotiating the tensions in sharing discursive authority within an educational system dominated by power hierarchies is complex and requires ongoing examination of teacher-student roles. This study is important for informing efforts to foster egalitarian and inclusive science education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adler, M., Rougle, E., Kaiser, E., & Caughlan, S. (2003). Closing the gap between content and practice: Toward more dialogic discussion in the language arts classroom. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 47(4), 312–322.
Aitken, V., Fraser, D., & Price, G. (2007). Negotiating the spaces: Relational pedagogy and power in drama teaching. International Journal for Education & the Arts, 8(14), 1–19.
Alexander, R. (2005, July). Culture, dialogue and learning: Notes on an emerging pedagogy. In Keynote presentation at the annual conference for the international association for cognitive education and psychology, Durham, UK.
Baxter, L. A. (2004). Relationships as dialogues. Personal Relationships, 11, 1–22.
Beeman-Cadwallader, N., Buck, G., & Trauth-Nare, A. (2014). Tipping the balance from expert to facilitator: Examining myths about being a teacher educator. Studying Teacher Education, 10(1), 70–85.
Berry, A. (2007). Reconceptualizing teacher educator knowledge as tensions: Exploring the tension between valuing and reconstructing experience. Studying Teacher Education, 3(2), 117–134.
Biesta, G. (2004). “Mind the gap!” Communication and the educational relation. In C. Bingham & A. Sidorkin (Eds.), No education without relation (pp. 11–22). New York: Peter Lang.
Bingham, C., & Sidorkin, A. (2001). Aesthetics and the paradox of educational relation. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35, 21–30.
Bingham, C., & Sidorkin, A. (Eds.). (2004). No education without relation. New York: Peter Lang.
Brown, B. A. (2004). Discursive identity: Assimilation into the culture of science and its implications for minority students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 810–834.
Brownlee, J. (2004). Teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs: Developing a relational model of teaching. Research in Education, 72, 1–17.
Brubaker, N. D. (2010). Negotiating authority through jointly constructing the course curriculum. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18(2), 159–180.
Brubaker, N. D. (2012). Negotiating authority through cultivating a classroom community of inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 240–250.
Calabrese Barton, A. (1998). Feminist science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Candela, A. (1999). Students’ power in classroom discourse. Linguistics and Education, 10(2), 139–163.
Carlsen, W. S. (1992). Closing down the conversation: Discouraging student talk on unfamiliar science content. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27(2), 15–21.
Carlsen, W. S. (1997). Never ask a question if you don’t know the answer: The tension in teaching between modeling scientific argument and maintaining law and order. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32, 14–23.
Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, UK: Heinemann.
Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2–11.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937.
Crawford, T., Kelly, G. J., & Brown, C. (2000). Ways of knowing beyond facts and laws of science: An ethnographic investigation of student engagement in scientific practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 237–258.
Darby, L. (2005). Students’ perceptions of engaging pedagogy. Research in Science Education, 35, 425–445.
Feldman, A. (2003). Validity and quality in self-study. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 26–28.
Gergen, K. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York: Oxford University Press.
Glesne, C. (2006). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Hanrahan, M. U. (2005). Highlighting hybridity: A critical discourse analysis of teacher talk in classrooms. Science Education, 90, 8–43.
Kelly, G. J. (2007). Discourse in science classrooms. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 443–469). Oxford, UK: Routledge Publishers, Taylor and Francis Group.
Kitchen, J. (2005a). Looking backward, moving forward: Understanding my narrative as a teacher educator. Studying Teacher Education, 1(1), 17–30.
Kitchen, J. (2005b). Conveying respect and empathy: Becoming a relational teacher educator. Studying Teacher Education, 1(2), 195–207.
Lemke, J. (2000). Multimedia literacy demands of the scientific curriculum. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 247–271.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language learning, and values. Westport, CN: Ablex.
Loughran, J., & Northfield, J. (1998). A framework for the development of self-study practice. In M. L. Hamilton, S. Pinnegar, T. Russell, T. Loughran, & V. LaBoskey (Eds.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 7–18). New York: Routlege.
Luehmann, A. L. (2008). Using blogging in support of teacher professional identity development: A case study. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 287–337.
Margonis, F. (1998). The demise of authenticity. Philosophy of Education Yearbook. Retrieved from http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PES-Yearbook/1998/margonis_2.html
Matusov, E. (2007). Applying Bakhtin scholarship on discourse in education: A critical review essay. Educational Theory, 57(2), 215–237.
Mortimer, E. F. (1998). Multivoicedness and univocality in classroom discourse: An example from theory of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 67–82.
Olitsky, S. (2007). Promoting student engagement in science: Interaction rituals and the pursuit of a community of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 33–56.
Olitsky, S., Flohr, L. L., Gardner, J., & Billups, M. (2010). Coherence, contradiction and the development of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(10), 1209–1228.
Oliveira, A. W., Sadler, T. D., & Suslak, D. F. (2007). The linguistic construction of expert identity in professor-student discussions of science. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 2, 119–150.
Pithouse, K., Mitchell, C., & Weber, S. (2009). Self-study in teaching and teacher development: A call to action. Educational Action Research, 17, 43–62.
Reinsvold, L. A., & Cochran, K. F. (2012). Power dynamics and questioning in elementary science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 745–768.
Ritchie, S. M. (2002). Student positioning within groups during science activities. Research in Science Education, 32, 35–54.
Rodgers, C. A. (2006). Attending to student voice: The impact of descriptive feedback on learning and teaching. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 209–237.
Roth, W.-M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–631.
Shuck, S., & Russell, T. (2005). Self-study, critical friendship, and the complexities of teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 1(2), 107–121.
Sidorkin, A. M. (1999). Beyond discourse: Education, the self, and dialogue. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Sidorkin, A. M. (2004). In the event of learning: Alienation and participative thinking in education. Educational Theory, 54, 251–262.
Smith, G. A. (2007). Place-based education: Breaking through the constraining regularities of public school. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 189–207.
Strack, R. W., Magill, C., & McDonagh, K. (2004). Engaging youth through photovoice. Health Promotion Practice, 5, 49–57.
Thayer-Bacon, B. (2004). Personal and social relations in education. In C. Bingham & A. Sidorkin (Eds.), No education without relation (pp. 165–180). New York: Peter Lang.
van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Reflective discourse: Developing shared understandings in a physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 209–228.
Wang, C., & Burris, M. (1994). Empowerment through photo novella: Portraits of participation. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 171–186.
Zeichner, K. (2008). A critical analysis of reflection as a goal for teacher education. Educação & Sociedad, 29, 535–554.
Zenk, S. N., Schulz, A. J., Israel, B. A., James, S. A., Bao, S., & Wilson, M. L. (2005). Neighborhood racial composition, neighborhood poverty and the accessibility of supermarkets in metropolitan Detroit. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 660–667.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trauth-Nare, A., Buck, G.A., Beeman-Cadwallader, N. (2016). Promoting Student Agency in Science Inquiry: A Self-Study of Relational Pedagogical Practices in Science Teacher Education. In: Buck, G., Akerson, V. (eds) Enhancing Professional Knowledge of Pre-Service Science Teacher Education by Self-Study Research. ASTE Series in Science Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32447-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32447-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32445-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32447-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)