Skip to main content

Experimental Investigation and Modeling of Coalescence and Agglomeration for Spray Drying of Solutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Binary drop collisions were investigated with polymer solutions of a wide range of viscosities. Two experimental setups were constructed for producing droplet chains with liquids of low viscosities from 2 to 60 mPa · s and for liquids of high viscosities from 116 to 729 mPa · s. The low-viscous liquids were composed of three different aqueous solutions: sucrose with solids content from 20 to 60 %, PVP (1-Ethenyl-2-pyrrolidone) K17 with solids content from 5 to 35 %, and PVP K30 with solids content from 5 to 25 %. The high-viscous liquids were produced by PVP K17 solutions with solids content from 45 to 55 %. For the low-viscous liquids vibrating orifice drop generators were applied for drop generation, while for the high-viscous liquids a special drop generator based on pulse jetting was developed. Two drop trains were produced and the drops were directed toward each other at a certain angle so that individual droplet pairs collide with a desired velocity. For recording the collision events two high-speed cameras were used. One camera was positioned perpendicular to the collision plane recording the outcome of the collision, and the second camera was aligned parallel to the collision plane to assure that the droplet chains were exactly in one plane. Time-resolved series of pictures were used to analyze the dynamics of droplet collisions. Here, relative velocities between 0.5 and 4 m/s and impact parameters in the interval from 0 to 1 for equal-sized droplets have been investigated. For lower viscosities coalescence, reflexive separation, stretching separation, and bouncing were observed as outcomes of binary drop collisions. For this viscosity range, a model is proposed to predict the beginning of reflexive separation, using a viscosity-dependent correlation for the critical Weber number for head-on collisions. The existing model for stretching separation is found to be functional for a wide range of viscosities. The model constants could be uniquely related to the ratio of surface tension to dynamic viscosity for the different liquids considered. Thereby the shift of the triple point, where coalescence, bouncing and reflexive separation clustered together on the collision map, could be predicted. Experimental data for formation of satellite droplets were also provided. For the regime of high viscosities, the model for stretching separation was examined, and it is found that the model constants are dependent on the liquid viscosity. Additionally, collisions of droplets of different viscosities were investigated using the fluorescence technique. Penetration, or encapsulation, was documented, as well as delay of coalescence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hou, S., & Schmidt, D. P. (2006). Adaptive collision meshing and satellite droplet formation in spray simulations. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 32, 935–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blei, S. (2005). On the interaction of non-uniform particles during the spray drying process: Experiments and modelling with the Euler-Lagrange approach. PhD Dissertation, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adam, J. R., & Lindblad, N. R. (1968). The collision, coalescence, and disruption of water droplets. Journal of Applied Physics, 39, 173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brazier-Smith, P. R., Jennings, S. G., & Latham, J. (1972). The interaction of falling water drops: Coalescence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 326, 393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Park, R. W. (1970). Behavior of water drops colliding in humid nitrogen. PhD Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Qian, J., & Law, C. K. (1997). Regimes of coalescence and separation in droplet collision. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 331, 59–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, P., & Law, C. K. (2011). An analysis of head-on droplet collision with large deformation in gaseous medium. Physics of Fluids, 23(4), 042102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gotaas, C., Havelka, P., Jakobsen, H. A., Svendsen, H. F., Matthias, H., Roth, N., et al. (2007). Effect of viscosity on droplet-droplet collision outcome: Experimental study and numerical comparison. Physics of Fluids, 19, 102106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuschel, M., & Sommerfeld, M. (2013). Investigation of droplet collisions for solutions with different solids content. Experiments in Fluids, 54, 1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sommerfeld, M., & Kuschel, M. (2013). Collisions of high viscous droplets: Experiments and modelling. In Eighth International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Jeju.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ashgriz, N., & Poo, J. Y. (1990). Coalescence and separation in binary collision of liquid drops. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 221, 183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Estrade, J.-P., Carentz, H., Lavergne, G., & Biscos, Y. (1999). Experimental investigation of dynamic binary collision of ethanol droplets—A model for droplet coalescence and bouncing. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 20, 486–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang, Y. J., Umemura, A., & Law, C. K. (1992). An experimental investigation on the collision behaviour of hydrocarbon droplets. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 234, 171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Westergaard, V. (2010). Milk powder technology. Soborg: GEA Process Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nitsche, R. (2011). Milk protein analysis with the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer and the Agilent Protein 80 kit. Waldbronn, Germany: Agilent Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schroeder, J., Lederer, M., Gaukel, V., & Schuchmann, H. (2011). Effect of atomizer geometry and rheological properties on effervescent atomization of aqueous polyvinylpyrrolidone solutions. In Proceeding of ILASS—Europe 2011, 24th Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Estoril/PT.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bubnik, Z., Kadlec, P., Urban, D., & Bruhns, M. (1995). Chemical and physical data for sugar manufacturers and users. In Sugar technologists manual (8th ed.). Verlag Dr. A. Bartens, pp. 134, 150, 236.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Focke, C., & Bothe, D. (2011). Computational analysis of binary collisions of shear-thinning droplets. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 166(14–15), 799–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Naue, G., & Bärwolff, G. (1992). Transportprozesse in Fluiden. Leipzig: Deutscher Verlag für Grundstoffindustrie GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Blei, S., Sommerfeld, M., Tsotsas, E., & Mujumdar, A. S. (2007). Computational tools at different scales. In CFD in drying technology—Spray-dryer simulation. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, pp. 155–08.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brenn, G., Valkovska, D., & Danov, K. (2001). The formation of satellite droplets by unstable binary droplet collisions. Physics of Fluids, 13(9), 2463–2477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ko, G., & Ryou, H. (2005). Modeling of droplet collision-induced breakup process. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 31, 723–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sommerfeld, M., & Stübing, S. (2012). Lagrangian modeling of agglomeration for applications to spray drying. In Ninth International ERCOFTAC Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modeling and Measurements, Thessaloniki, Greece, 6–8 June 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Darvan, A., & Sommerfeld, M. (2014). Modeling and numerical analysis of the drying stages during single droplet drying. In 19th International Drying Symposium (IDS 2014), Lyon, France, August 24–27, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sommerfeld, M. (2015) (invited lecture). Modelling requirements for CFD calculations of spray dryers. Jornadas em Escoamentos Multifásicos 2015 (JEM 2015), Campinas Brazil, 25th to 27th March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support by the German Research Council (DFG: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) through the grant SO 204-35/1-3 in the frame of the SPP 1423 (Prozess-Spray) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors furthermore are very grateful for the intensive cooperation with all the partners involved in the Prozess-Spray.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Sommerfeld .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Li, H., Kuschel, M., Sommerfeld, M. (2016). Experimental Investigation and Modeling of Coalescence and Agglomeration for Spray Drying of Solutions. In: Fritsching, U. (eds) Process-Spray. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32370-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics