Abstract
Dialogue and mutual learning between civil society and researchers involved in natural resource management have been increasingly advocated as a means of improving public understanding of science, biodiversity conservation, and local well-being. In rural areas in developing countries, however, science communication and environmental education strategies for disseminating biodiversity conservation research have traditionally used methods based on top-down, one-way approaches that have limited local engagement in research and undermined feedback generation between local people and researchers. This chapter examines a participatory process of developing a communication strategy for an environmental conservation research project in Southeastern Mexico. By analyzing data from interviews and focus groups with stakeholders from six rural and indigenous communities, opportunities and challenges on how to collaboratively plan a communication strategy aiming to both disseminate the research and foster mutual learning are identified and discussed. Such participatory approach increases the social relevance of the research and improves both research results and dissemination products.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berkes, F., Reid, W. V., Wilbanks, T. J., & Capistrano, D. (2006). Conclusions: Bridging scales and knowledge systems. In W. R. Reid, F. Berkes, Wilbanks, T. J. & D. Capistrano (Eds.) Bridging scales and knowledge systems: Concepts and applications in ecosystem assessment. Washington: Island Press (pp. 315–331).
Bickford, D., Posa, M. R. C., Qie, L., Campos-Arceiz, A., & Kudavidanage, E. P. (2012). Science communication for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 151, 74–76.
Castillo, A., Torres, A., Velázquez, A., & Bocco, G. (2006). The use of ecological science by rural producers: A case study in Mexico. Ecological Applications, 15(2), 745–756.
González-Ventosa, I. (2011). Elaboración, análisis y evaluación de una propuesta de Programa de Educación Ambiental para la reserva ejidal Much’ Kanan K’áax, de Felipe Carrillo Puerto, Quintana Roo. México. Environmental Science Degree. Barcelona: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
Güell, N. (2004). Análisis de Foros Participativos. Propuesta y Ensayo de un Método e Instrumentos de Análisis, en el Caso del Primer Foro Público de la Estrategia Catalana de Educación Ambiental. Environmental Science Master. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Jiménez, A., Iniesta-Arandia, I., Muñoz-Santos, M., Martín-López, B., Jacobson, S., & Benayas, J. (2014). Typology of public outreach for biodiversity conservation projects in Spain. Conservation Biology, 28(3), 829–840.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.
Méndez-López, M. E., García-Frapolli, E., Pritchard, D. J., Sánchez González, M. C., Ruiz-Mallén, I., Porter-Bolland, L., et al. (2014). Local participation in biodiversity conservation initiatives: A comparative analysis of different models in South East Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 321–329.
Reyes-Garcia, V., Ruiz-Mallen, I., Porter-Bolland, L., Garcia-Frapolli, E., Ellis, E., Mendez, M. E., et al. (2013). Local understandings of conservation in Southeastern Mexico and their implications for community-based conservation as an alternative paradigm. Conservation Biology, 27(4), 856–865.
Rist, S., Boillat, S., Gerritsen, P. R. W., Schneider, F., Mathez-Stiefel, S., & Tapia, N. (2011). Endogenous knowledge: Implications for sustainable development. In U. Wiesmann & H. Hurni (Eds.), Research for sustainable development: Foundations, experiences, and perspectives. Perspectives of the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South, University of Bern (Vol. 6, pp. 119–146). Bern, Switzerland: Geographica Bernensia.
Ruiz-Mallén, I., Newing, H., Porter-Bolland, L., Pritchard, M. D., García-Frapolli, E., Méndez-López, M. E., et al. (2014). Cognisance, participation and protected areas in the Yucatan Peninsula. Environmental Conservation, 41(3), 265–275.
Schultz, P. W. (2002). Knowledge, information, and household recycling: Examining the knowledge-deficit model of behavior change. In T. Dietz & P. Stern (Eds.), New tools for environmental protection: Education, information and voluntary measures (pp. 67–82). Washington: The National Academy Press.
Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 55–74.
Sutcliffe, H. (2011). A report on responsible research and innovation. London: MATTER Business Group.
Torres-Albero, C., Fernández-Esquinas, M., Rey-Rocha, J., & Martín-Sempere, M. J. (2011). Dissemination practices in the Spanish research system: Scientists trapped in a golden cage. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 12–25.
UNESCO. (2015). Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). At: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/leading-the-international-agenda/education-for-sustainable-development/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ruiz-Mallén, I. (2016). Communicating Biodiversity Conservation Research Through Dialogue and Mutual Learning in Rural and Indigenous Communities. In: Castro, P., Azeiteiro, U., Bacelar-Nicolau, P., Leal Filho, W., Azul, A. (eds) Biodiversity and Education for Sustainable Development . World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32318-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32318-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32317-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32318-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)