Skip to main content

Surgical Treatments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of Fecal Incontinence

Abstract

In the treatment of fecal incontinence, surgical invasive procedures are ordinarily reserved for patients with whom conservative or minimally invasive treatments were unsuccessful [1]. A careful selection of patients and an accurate and consistent identification of disorders, which lie at the root of the condition, are essential to the treatment’s success. In cases of fecal incontinence which are associated with or caused by disease which alter the anatomy and sphincter system function, such as hemorrhoids or rectal prolapse, perianal fistula, rectovaginal fistula, and cloacal lesions, these diseases must be treated first, as their resolution often leads to an improvement in or the resolution of incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rao SSC. Current and emerging treatment options for fecal incontinence. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48(9):752–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernando RJ, Sultan AH, Kettle C, Thakar R. Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;8(12).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sultan AH. Obstetric perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clin Risk. 1999;5:193–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koelbl H, Igawa T, Salvatore S, Laterza RM, Lowry A, Sievert KD, et al. Pathophysiology of urinary incontinence, faecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. 5th ed. [place unknown]: ICUD-EAU; 2013. p. 261–359.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Premkumar G. Perineal trauma: reducing associated postnatal maternal morbidity. RCM Midwives. 2005;8(1):30–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fornell EU, Matthiesen L, Sjodahl R, Berg G. Obstetric anal sphincter injury ten years after: subjective and objective long term effects. BJOG. 2005;112:312–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rieger N, Wattchow D. The effect of vaginal delivery on anal function. Aust N Z J Surg. 1999;69:172–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Valsky DV, Lipschuetz M, Bord A, Eldar I, Messing B, Hochner-Celnikier D, Lavy Y, Cohen SM, Yagel S. Fetal head circumference and length of secondary stage ah labor are risk for levator ani muscle injury, diagnosed by 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:91–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Midwifery J, McCandlish R. Perineal trauma: prevention and treatment. Womens Health. 2001;46(6):396–401.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Snooks SJ, Swash M, Mathers SE, et al. Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: a five-year follow-up. Br J Surg. 1990;2:1358–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, Milsom I. Faecal incontinence 20 years after one birth: a comparison between vaginal delivery and caesarean section. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(10):1411–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lamblin G, Bouvier P, Damon H, Chabert P, Moret S, Chene G, Mellier G. Long-term outcome after overlapping anterior anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:1377–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson E, Carlsen E, Steen TB, Backer Hjorthaug JO, Eriksen MT, Johannessen HO. Short- and long-term results of secondary anterior sphincteroplasty in 33 patients with obstetric injury. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(11):1466–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Power D, Fitzpatrick M, O'Herlihy C. Obstetric anal sphincter injury: how to avoid, how to repair: a literature review. J Fam Pract. 2006;55:193–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown SR, Wadhawan H, Nelson RL. Surgery for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2(7).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gleason JL. Anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence: effect on symptom severity, quality of life, and anal sphincter squeeze pressure. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:1587–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Faltin D, Boulvain M, Irion O, Bretones S, Stan C, Weil A. Diagnosis of anal sphincter tears by postpartum endosonography to predict fecal incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:643–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Glasgow SC, Lowry AC. Long-term outcomes of anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:482–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Halverson AL, Hull TL. Long-term outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:345–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Parks AG, McPartlin JF. Late repair of injuries of the anal sphincter. Proc R Soc Med. 1971;64(12):1187–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Riss S, Stift A, Teleky B, Rieder E, Mittlböck M, Maier A, et al. Long-term anorectal and sexual function after overlapping anterior anal sphincter repair: a case-match study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1095–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barisic GI, Krivokapic ZV, Markovic VA, Popovic MA. Outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair after 3 months and after a mean of 80 months. Int J Color Dis. 2006;21:52–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Young CJ, Mathur MN, Eyers AA, Solomon MJ. Successful overlapping anal sphincter repair: relationship to patient age, neuropathy, and colostomy formation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:344–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nielsen MB, Dammegaard L, Pedersen JF. Endosonographic assessment of the anal sphincter after surgical reconstruction. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(5):434–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Walsh KA, Grivell RM. Use of endoanal ultrasound for reducing the risk of complications related to anal sphincter injury after vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;29(10).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sultan AH, Monga AK, Kumar D, Stanton SL. Primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture using the overlap technique. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106(4):318–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Setti Carraro P, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ. Long-term results of postanal repair for neurogenic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 1994;81(1):140–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Matsuoka H, Mavrantonis C, Wexner SD, et al. Postanal repair for fecal incontinence – is it worthwhile? Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(11):1561–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mackey P, Mackey L, Kennedy ML, et al. Postanal repair – do the long-term results justify the procedure? Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(4):367–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bartolo DC, Paterson HM. Anal incontinence. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23(4):505–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bartolo DC. Point of view: anal incontinence in men. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2008;32(11):949–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wexner SD, Bleier J. Current surgical strategies to treat fecal incontinence. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;9(12):1577–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shi GG, Wang H, Wang L, Zhang ZX, Wang H. Two different gracilis loops in graciloplasty of congenital fecal incontinence: comparison of the therapeutic effects. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30(10):1391–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Walega P, Romaniszyn M, Siarkiewicz B, Zelazny D. Dynamic versus adynamic graciloplasty in treatment of end-stage fecal incontinence: is the implantation of the pacemaker really necessary? 12-month follow-up in a clinical, physiological, and functional study. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:698516.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Mantoo S, Meurette G, Podevin J, Lehur PA. The magnetic anal sphincter: a new device in the management of severe anal incontinence. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012;9:483–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lehur PA, McNevin S, Buntzen S, et al. Magnetic anal sphincter augmentation for the treatment of fecal incontinence: a preliminary report from a feasibility study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(12):1604–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Barussaud ML, Mantoo S, Wyart V, et al. The magnetic anal sphincter in faecal incontinence: is initial success sustained over time? Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(12):1499–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Mongardini MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Note: The figures 12.7, 12.9, 12.12, 12.13, and 12.16 have been realized by Ilaria Bondi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mongardini, M., Giofrè, M. (2016). Surgical Treatments. In: Mongardini, M., Giofrè, M. (eds) Management of Fecal Incontinence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32226-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32226-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32224-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32226-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics