Implications of Open Source Design for Sustainability

Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 52)


In order to cope with the challenges of sustainability, systematic methods have been developed for improving the ratio between usefulness and environmental impact of products. These necessary efforts are however constrained if the surrounding business model patterns are not challenged at the same time. In this article, open source design (OSD) is presented as a potential concept leading towards alternative and eco-efficient production and consumption patterns. Potential advantages of OSD for environmental sustainability are hypothesized and confronted with the analysis of the environmental friendliness of four open source products. Two synergies between sustainable design and OSD are identified (product modularity and design for local manufacturing) as well as corresponding challenges for further research.


Open source innovation Open hardware Sustainable product design Eco-design 


  1. 1.
    Wimmer, W., Züst, R.: Ecodesign Pilot—Product-Investigation-, Learning- and Optimization-Tool for Sustainable Product Development with CD-ROM. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pigosso, D.C.A., Rozenfeld, H., McAloone, T.C.: Ecodesign maturity model: a management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies. J. Clean. Prod. 59, 160–173 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lagerstedt, J., Luttropp, C.: Guidelines in ecodesign: a case study from railway industry. In: Brissaud, D., Tichkiewitch, S., Zwolinski, P. (eds.) Innovation in Life Cycle Engineering and Sustainable Development, pp. 245–254. Springer, Netherlands (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tukker, A., Tischner, U.: Product-services as a research field: past, present and future. Reflections from a decade of research. J. Clean. Prod. 14(17), 1552–1556 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bocken, N.M.P., Short, S.W., Rana, P., Evans, S.: A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J. Clean. Prod. 65, 42–56 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dougherty, D.: The maker movement, innovations: technology. Governance, Globalization 7(3), 11–14 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fjeldsted, A.S., Adalsteinsdottir, G., Howard, T.J., McAloone, T.C.: Open source development of tangible products-from a business perspective. Presented at the NordDesign 2012 Conference, Aalborg, Dennmark, 22–24 Aug 2012Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raasch, C., Herstatt, C., Balka, K.: On the open design of tangible goods. R&D Manage. 39(4), 382–393 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huizingh, E.K.R.E.: Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation 31(1), 2–9 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Balka, K., Raasch, C., Herstatt, C.: How open is open source?—Software and beyond. Creativity Innov. Manage. 19(3), 248–256 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Depoorter, G.: La ‘communauté du logiciel libre’ : espace contemporain de reconfiguration des luttes? In: Frère B., Jacquemain M. (eds.) Résister au quotidien ? Presses de Sciences Po, Paris (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heyer, S., Seliger, G.: Open manufacturing for value creation cycles. In: Matsumoto, D.M., Umeda, P.Y., Masui, D.K., Fukushige, D.S. (eds.) Design for Innovative Value Towards a Sustainable Society, pp. 110–115. Springer, Netherlands (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Müller-Seitz, G., Reger, G.: Networking beyond the software code? An explorative examination of the development of an open source car project. Technovation 30(11–12), 627–634 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hansen, A., Howard, T.J.: The current state of open source hardware: the need for an open source development platform. In: Chakrabarti A., Prakash R.V. (eds.) ICoRD’13, pp. 977–988. Springer, India (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bonvoisin, J., Boujut, J.-F.: Open design platforms for open source product development: current state and requirements. In: Innovation and Creativity, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design, vol. 8, pp. 11–22. Milan, Italy (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Adler, B.T., de Alfaro, L., Mola-Velasco, S.M., Rosso, P., West, A.G.: Wikipedia Vandalism detection: combining natural language, metadata, and reputation features. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, pp. 277–288. Springer, Berlin (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rahwan, I.: How crowdsourcing turned on me. Nautilus, no. 18 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Buitenhuis, A.J., Pearce, J.M.: Open-source development of solar photovoltaic technology. Energy Sustain. Dev. 16(3), 379–388 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johansson, A., Kisch, P., Mirata, M.: Distributed economies—a new engine for innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 13(10–11), 971–979 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Industrial Information Technology, Institute for Machine-Tools and Factory ManagementTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations