Advertisement

Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing as Supporting Tools for EVs Lightweight Design

  • Laura Zanchi
  • Massimo Delogu
  • Marcos Ierides
  • Harilaos Vasiliadis
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 52)

Abstract

This study is concerned with the lifecycle impact and cost of lightweight design for Electric Vehicles (EVs). The applicability of novel materials, bio-composite and fiber reinforced thermoset matrix primarily, and related innovative manufacturing technologies, is evaluated for some relevant modules of vehicle. The study is part of the ENLIGHT European project that aims to advance highly innovative lightweight materials and technologies for application in structural vehicle parts of future volume produced (EVs) along four axes: performance, manufacturability, cost and lifecycle footprint. The preliminary results showed that, for the specific studies, material production and manufacturing represent the most critical life-cycle phases from environmental and economic point of view respectively. The trade-off between impacts of production and use phase needs to be faced by means of detailed analysis when EVs lightweight solutions are proposed.

Keywords

Lightweight design Composite Electric vehicles Manufacturing Life cycle assessment Life cycle costing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The presented work was funded by the European Commission within the project ENLIGHT (Grant agreement No: 314567): www.project-enlight.eu. The authors, as partners of the project, wish to thank all ENLIGHT partners for their contribution, particularly: Jaguar Land Rover, Magneti Marelli, Fraunhofer LBF, Airborne, DSM and Oxeon need to be thanked for providing major parts of the results beside the listed authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Siskos, P., Capros, P., De Vita, A.: CO2 and energy efficiency car standards in the EU in the context of a decarbonisation strategy: a model-based policy assessment. Energy Policy 84, 22–34 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cicconi, P., Germani, M., Landi, D., Mengarelli, M.: Life cycle cost from consumer side: a comparison between traditional and ecological vehicles. In: Energy Conference, IEEE International, pp. 1440–1445 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mayyas, A., Qattawi, A., Omar, M., Shan, D.: Design for sustainability in automotive industry: a comprehensive review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16(4), 1845–1862 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pallaro, E., Subramanian, N., Abdulrahman, M.D., Liu, C.: Sustainable production and consumption in the automotive sector: integrated review framework and research directions. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 4, 47–61 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zanchi, L., Delogu, M., Zamagni, A., Pierini, M.: Analysis of the main elements affecting social LCA applications: insights for the automotive sector. Submitted to International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Witik, R.A., Payet, J., Michaud, V., Ludwig, C., Månson, J.-A.E.: Assessing the life cycle costs and environmental performance of lightweight materials in automobile applications. Compos. Part Appl. Sci. Manuf. 42(11), 1694–1709 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISO 14040: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Swarr, T.E., Hunkeler, D., Klöpffer, W., Pesonen, H.-L., Ciroth, A., Brent, A.C., Pagan, R.: Environmental life-cycle costing: a code of practice. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 6(5), 389–391 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hunkeler, D., Lichtenvort, K., Rebitzer, G., Ciroth, A., di SETAC-Europe, A.c.: Environmental life cycle costing. SETAC , Pensacola, Fla.; CRC Press, Boca Raton (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spielmann, M., Scholz, R.: Life cycle inventories of transport services: background data for freight transport. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 10, 85–94 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cichowicz, J., Theotokatos, G., Vassalos, D.: Dynamic energy modelling for ship life-cycle performance assessment. Ocean Eng. (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Del Pero, F., Delogu, M., Pierini, M., Bonaffini, D.: Life cycle assessment of a heavy metro train. J. Clean. Prod. 87, 787–799 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Renault. Fluence, Fluence Z.E.: Life Cycle Assessment (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Volkswagen, A.G.: The Golf. Environmental Commendation—Background Report (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koffler, C.: Life cycle assessment of automotive lightweighting through polymers under US boundary conditions. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 19, 538–545 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dhingra, R., Das, S.: Life cycle energy and environmental evaluation of downsized vs. lightweight material automotive engines. J. Clean. Prod. 85, 347–358 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Delogu, M., Del Pero, F., Romoli, F., Pierini, M.: Life cycle assessment of a plastic air intake manifold. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Finkbeiner, M., Hoffmann, R.: Application of life cycle assessment for the environmental certificate of the Mercedes-Benz S-Class. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 11, 240–246 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mayyas, A.T., Qattawi, A., Mayyas, A.R., Omar, M.A.: Life cycle assessment-based selection for a sustainable lightweight body-in-white design. Energy 39, 412–425 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hawkins, T.R., Singh, B., Majeau-Bettez, G., Strømman, A.H.: Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles: LCA of conventional and electric vehicles. J. Ind. Ecol. 17, 53–64 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wong, Y.S., Lu, W.-F., Wang, Z.: Life cycle cost analysis of different vehicle technologies in Singapore. World Electr. Veh. J. 4 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim, H.-J., Keoleian, G.A., Skerlos, S.J.: Economic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions reduction by vehicle lightweighting using aluminum and high-strength steel. J. Ind. Ecol. 15, 64–80 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schau, E.M., Traverso, M., Lehmann, A., Finkbeiner, M.: Life cycle costing in sustainability assessment—a case study of remanufactured alternators. Sustainability 3, 2268–2288 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Duflou, J.R., De Moor, J., Verpoest, I., Dewulf, W.: Environmental impact analysis of composite use in car manufacturing. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 58, 9–12 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    ALIVE—SEAM: Advanced High Volume Affordable Lightweighting for Future Electric Vehicles, 2012. Available at: http://www.project-alive.eu/ (2015)
  26. 26.
    Vermeulen, I., Van Caneghem, J., Block, C., Baeyens, J., Vandecasteele, C.: Automotive shredder residue (ASR): reviewing its production from end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) and its recycling, energy or chemicals’ valorisation. J. Hazard. Mater. 190, 8–27 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Berzi, L., Delogu, M., Giorgetti, A., Pierini, M.: On-field investigation and process modelling of end-of-life vehicles treatment in the context of Italian craft-type authorized treatment facilities. Waste Manag. 33, 892–906 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eurostat: Energy Price Statistics—Statistics Explained. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Energy_price_statistics (2015)

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Zanchi
    • 1
  • Massimo Delogu
    • 1
  • Marcos Ierides
    • 2
  • Harilaos Vasiliadis
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Bax & Willems Consulting VenturingBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations