How are Micro Enterprises Adopting Emergent Technologies?

  • Peter DorringtonEmail author
  • Franck Lacan
  • Samuel Bigot
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 52)


This paper presents the results from a survey of emerging and micro SMEs, along with entrepreneurs, creative practitioners, and the new group of ‘makers’, who are beginning to adopt (or consider adopting) the newer entry-level emergent technologies such as 3D printing. A number of key findings are discussed: including, the prevalence of ‘self-taught’ users of these technologies; major business activity in the creative industry space; the importance of shared equipment usage by micro organisations in comparison to small companies using external bureau services. Unsurprisingly cost is still cited as a factor for poor uptake of emergent technologies, closely followed by a low awareness of 3D printing and its capabilities, and 3D printing supply chains. Skill levels reported by the participants for each technology highlighted that 3D printing had the most pro-users, which may highlight the increased access to such technologies for micro enterprises, typically reserved for incumbent organisations.


Micro SME 3Dprinting Digital technologies Emerging technologies 


  1. 1.
    Price Waterhouse Coopers, 3D printing and the new shape of industrial manufacturing. Accessed 08/12/2015 (2014)
  2. 2.
    Conner, B.P., Manogharan, G.P., Meyers, K.L.: An assessment of implementation of entry-level 3D printers from the perspective of small businesses. Rapid Prototyping J. 21(5), 582–597 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Romouzy-Ali, A., Noroozi, S., Sewell, P., Humphries-Smith, T.: Adopting rapid prototyping technology within small and medium-sized enterprises: the differences between reality and expectation. Int. J. Innov. Manage. Technol. 3(4), 427–443 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mason, J.: Qualitative Research. Sage (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Teddie, C., Tashakkori, A.: Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioural Sciences. Sage (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bryman, A., Bell, E.: Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gibbs, G.: Learning by Doing: A Guide to Teaching and Learning Methods. Further Educational Unit, Oxford Polytechnic (1988)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ProJet 6000—exceptional ease-of-use with SLA technology. Accessed 09 Sep 2014
  9. 9.
    Titan 1 starter printer package. Accessed 09 Sep 2014
  10. 10.
    Troxler, P., Schweikert, S.: Developing a business model for concurrent enterprising at the Fab Lab. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, pp. 21–23. Lugano, Switzerland (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sissons, A., Thompson, S.: Three Dimensional Policy: Why Britain Needs a Policy Framework for 3D Printing. The Big Innovation Centre, London (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Molitch-Hou, M.: Consumer 3D printing more than 5 years away from mainstream adoption, says Gartner. (2014). Accessed 09 Sep 2014
  13. 13.
    3D Printshow, Accessed 09 Sep 2014
  14. 14.
    Van Holm, E.J.: Makerspaces and contributions to entrepreneurship. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 195, 24–31 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bosqué, C.: What are you printing? Ambivalent emancipation by 3D printing. Rapid Prototyping J. 21(5), 572–581 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cardiff Metropolitan UniversityCardiffUK
  2. 2.Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations