On Computing Breakpoint Distances for Genomes with Duplicate Genes

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9649)

Abstract

A fundamental problem in comparative genomics is to compute the distance between two genomes in terms of its higher-level organization (given by genes or syntenic blocks). For two genomes without duplicate genes, we can easily define (and almost always efficiently compute) a variety of distance measures, but the problem is NP-hard under most models when genomes contain duplicate genes. To tackle duplicate genes, three formulations (exemplar, maximum matching, and any matching) have been proposed, all of which aim to build a matching between homologous genes so as to minimize some distance measure. Of the many distance measures, the breakpoint distance (the number of non-conserved adjacencies) was the first one to be studied and remains of significant interest because of its simplicity and model-free property.

The three breakpoint distance problems corresponding to the three formulations have been widely studied. Although we provided last year a solution for the exemplar problem that runs very fast on full genomes, computing optimal solutions for the other two problems has remained challenging. In this paper, we describe very fast, exact algorithms for these two problems. Our algorithms rely on a compact integer-linear program that we further simplify by developing an algorithm to remove variables, based on new results on the structure of adjacencies and matchings. Through extensive experiments using both simulations and biological datasets, we show that our algorithms run very fast (in seconds) on mammalian genomes and scale well beyond. We also apply these algorithms (as well as the classic orthology tool MSOAR) to create orthology assignment, then compare their quality in terms of both accuracy and coverage. We find that our algorithm for the “any matching” formulation significantly outperforms other methods in terms of accuracy while achieving nearly maximum coverage.

Keywords

Breakpoint distance Exemplar Intermediate Maximum matching Gene family ILP Orthology assignment 

References

  1. 1.
    Fertin, G., Labarre, A., Rusu, I., Tannier, E., Vialette, S.: Combinatorics of Genome Rearrangements. MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bader, D.A., Moret, B.M.E., Yan, M.: A fast linear-time algorithm for inversion distance with an experimental comparison. J. Comput. Biol. 8(5), 483–491 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yancopoulos, S., Attie, O., Friedberg, R.: Efficient sorting of genomic permutations by translocation, inversion and block interchange. Bioinformatics 21(16), 3340–3346 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergeron, A., Mixtacki, J., Stoye, J.: A unifying view of genome rearrangements. In: Bücher, P., Moret, B.M.E. (eds.) WABI 2006. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 4175, pp. 163–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bailey, J.A., Eichler, E.E.: Primate segmental duplications: crucibles of evolution, diversity and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7(7), 552–564 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lynch, M.: The Origins of Genome Architecture. Sinauer, Sunderland (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sankoff, D.: Genome rearrangement with gene families. Bioinformatics 15(11), 909–917 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blin, G., Chauve, C., Fertin, G.: The breakpoint distance for signed sequences. In: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Algorithms and Computational Methods for Biochemical and Evolutionary Networks (CompBioNets 2004), vol. 3, pp. 3–16 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Angibaud, S., Fertin, G., Rusu, I., Thévenin, A., Vialette, S.: A pseudo-boolean programming approach for computing the breakpoint distance between two genomes with duplicate genes. In: Tesler, G., Durand, D. (eds.) RECMOB-CG 2007. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 4751, pp. 16–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blin, G., Chauve, C., Fertin, G., Rizzi, R., Vialette, S.: Comparing genomes with duplications: a computational complexity point of view. ACM/IEEE Trans. Comput. Bio. Bioinf. 14, 523–534 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nguyen, C.T., Tay, Y.C., Zhang, L.: Divide-and-conquer approach for the exemplar breakpoint distance. Bioinformatics 21(10), 2171–2176 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shao, M., Moret, B.M.E.: A fast and exact algorithm for the exemplar breakpoint distance. In: Przytycka, T.M. (ed.) RECOMB 2015. LNCS, vol. 9029, pp. 309–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Swenson, K.M., Marron, M., Earnest-DeYoung, J.V., Moret, B.M.E.: Approximating the true evolutionary distance between genomes. In: Proceedings of the 7th SIAM Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experiments (ALENEX 2005), pp. 121–129. SIAM Press (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Angibaud, S., Fertin, G., Rusu, I., Thévenin, A., Vialette, S.: Efficient tools for computing the number of breakpoints and the number of adjacencies between two genomes with duplicate genes. J. Comput. Biol. 15(8), 1093–1115 (2008)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen, X., Zheng, J., Fu, Z., Nan, P., Zhong, Y., Lonardi, S., Jiang, T.: Assignment of orthologous genes via genome rearrangement. ACM/IEEE Trans. Comput. Bio. Bioinf. 2(4), 302–315 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fu, Z., Chen, X., Vacic, V., Nan, P., Zhong, Y., Jiang, T.: MSOAR: a high-throughput ortholog assignment system based on genome rearrangement. J. Comput. Biol. 14(9), 1160–1175 (2007)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shi, G., Zhang, L., Jiang, T.: MSOAR 2.0: incorporating tandem duplications into ortholog assignment based on genome rearrangement. BMC Bioinform. 11(1), 10 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gurobi Optimization Inc.: Gurobi optimizer reference manual (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Computational Biology and BioinformaticsEPFLLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations