TRIZ as a Primary Tool for Biomimetics

Chapter

Abstract

The interface between biology and technology is well visited but bereft of theory. TRIZ is well suited to bridging such an interface but similarly lacks coherent theory, although it can be shown to work. In the absence of theory and associated numerical models, a semantic model has been developed by means of an ontology. The differences between the rigidity of theoretical ontology and the fluidity of biological adaptation and change can be surmounted by the adoption of the dialectic and the foundation of the TRIZ Contradiction Matrix. Biological terms, principles and morphologies can be interpolated into the standard Parameters and Inventive Principles of the Matrix. An example—the Mexican blind cavefish which escapes predation by moving into a dark environment and relying on senses other than sight—illustrates the workings of the dialectic and the necessity to describe the biological adaptation with several Inventive Principles. Thus, the BioOntology has a feature of OTSM, Altshuller’s partially developed second generation of TRIZ.

Keywords

Ontology Biological evolution Biomimetics Pareto set TRIZ matrix 

References

  1. Altshuller, G. (1988). Creativity as an exact science. New York: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  2. Altshuller, G. (1999). The innovation algorithm, TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center.Google Scholar
  3. Aneshansley, D., & Eisner, T. (1969). Biochemistry at 100C: Explosive secretory discharge of bombardier beetles (Brachinus). Science, 1656, 61–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Engels, F., Dutt, C., & Haldane, J. B. S. (1964). Dialectics of nature. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Gordon, J. E. (1976). The new science of strong materials, or why you don’t fall through the floor. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Hamilton, W. D. (1964a). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamilton, W. D. (1964b). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 17–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mann, D. L. (1999). Creativity as an exact (biomimetic) science. http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/1999/11/c/index.htm
  9. McNamara, K. B., Wedell, N., & Simmons, L. W. (2013). Experimental evolution reveals trade-offs between mating and immunity. Biology Letters, 9(4), 20130262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Savransky, S. D. (2000). Engineering of creativity: Introduction to TRIZ methodology of inventive problem solving. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sharma, S., Coombs, S., Patton, P., & de Perera, T. B. (2009). The function of wall-following behaviors in the Mexican blind cavefish and a sighted relative, the Mexican tetra (Astyanax). Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 195, 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Smith, B. (2012). Classifying processes: An essay in applied ontology. Ratio, 25, 463–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vincent, J. F. V. (2014). An ontology of biomimetics. In A. K. Goel, D. A. McAdams, & R. B. Stone (Eds.), Biologically inspired design: Computational methods and tools (pp. 269–285). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vincent, J. F. V., Bogatyreva, O. A., Bogatyrev, N. R., Bowyer, A., & Pahl, A.-K. (2006). Biomimetics: Its practice and theory. J R S Interface, 3(9), 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vincent, J. F. V., Bogatyreva, O., Pahl, A.-K., Bogatyrev, N., & Bowyer, A. (2005). Putting biology into TRIZ: A database of biological effects. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vincent, J. F. V., & Mann, D. L. (2000, September). TRIZ in biology teaching. TRIZ Journal.Google Scholar
  17. Vincent, J. F. V., & Mann, D. L. (2002). Systematic technology transfer from biology to engineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 360, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Walsh, M. J., & Anders, J. B. (1989). Riblet/LEBU research at NASA Langley. Applied Scientific Research, 46, 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations