Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Route to Software Process Improvement in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Software Process Evolution

Abstract

The software development industry is dominated by a myriad of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The main goal of this chapter is to provide a characterization of SMEs based on previous studies. It also includes an overview of a number of software process models and software process improvement (SPI) models, which are aimed at assisting SMEs in improving the way they develop software. Furthermore, this chapter discusses the extent of SPI approaches published in the literature as a way to understand the particular context and some of the major challenges faced. From there, we propose an approach to integrate software process practices. This proposal is based on the results of our study on this topic carried out in small software companies. It is focused on what small organizations could actually do, more than on what they are currently practicing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrahamsson, P., Oza, N., Siponen, M.T.: Agile software development methods: a comparative review. In: Dingsøyr, T., Dybå, T., Moe, N.B. (eds.) Agile Software Development, pp. 31–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahonen, J.J., Forsell, M., Taskinen, S.K.: A modest but practical software process modeling technique for software process improvement. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 7(1), 33–44 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahonen, J., Junttila, T.: A case study on quality-affecting problems in software engineering projects. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software: Science. Technology and Engineering, pp. 145–153. IEEE, Washington (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ahonen, J.J., Junttila, T., Sakkinen, M.: Impacts of the organizational model on testing: three industrial cases. empir. softw. eng. 9(4), 275–296 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alvarez, J.J., Hurtado, J.A.: Implementing the software requirements engineering practices of the ISO 29110-5-1-1 standard with the unified process. In: Proceedings of the Computing Colombian Conference, pp. 175–183. IEEE, Washington (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anacleto, A., Von Wangenheim, G., Salviano, C., Savi, R.: A method for process assessment in small software companies. In: Proceedings of the International SPICE Conference on Process Assessment and Improvement, pp. 69–76. ICSOFT, Portugal (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ariza, P., Pineres, M., Santiago, L., Mercado, N., De la Hoz, A.: Implementation of moprosoft level I and II in software development companies in the colombian caribbean, a commitment to the software product quality region. In: Proceedings of the Central America and Panama Convention, pp. 1–5. IEEE, Washington (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ayyagari, M., Beck, T., Demirgüc, A.: Small and medium enterprises across the globe: a new database. Policy Research Working Papers. The World Bank, Washington (2003). URL http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-3127

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baddoo, N., Hall, T.: De-motivators for software process improvement: an analysis of practitioners’ views. J. Syst. Softw. 66(1), 23–33 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barafort, B., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.): Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 425. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Basri, S., O’Connor, R.V.: Understanding the perception of very small software companies towards the adoption of process standards. In: Riel, A., O’Connor, R.V., Tichkiewitch, S., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 99, pp. 153–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boas, G., da Rocha, A., Pecegueiro do Amaral, M.: An approach to implement software process improvement in small and mid sized organizations. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, pp. 447–452. IEEE, Washington (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boehm, B., Turner, R.: Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boucher, Q., Perrouin, G., Deprez, J.C., Heymans, P.: Towards configurable ISO/IEC 29110-compliant software development processes for very small entities. In: Winkler, D., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 301, pp. 169–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Buchalcevova, A.: Software process improvement in small companies as a path to enterprise architecture. In: Pooley, R., Coady, J., Schneider, C., Linger, H., Barry, C., Lang, M. (eds.) Information Systems Development, pp. 243–253. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Calvo-Manzano Villalón, J.A., Gonzalo Cuevas, A., San Feliu Gilabert, T., de Amescua Seco, A., García Sánchez, L., Cota, M.P.: Experiences in the application of software process improvement in SME’s. Softw. Qual J 10(3), 261–273 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cater-Steel, A.: Process improvement in four small software companies. In: Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference, pp. 262–272. IEEE, Washington (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cater-Steel, A.: Low-rigour, rapid software process assessments for small software development firms. In: Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference, pp. 368–377. IEEE, Washington (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cater-Steel, A., Toleman, M., Rout, T.: Process improvement for small firms: an evaluation of the RAPID assessment-based method. Inf. Softw. Technol. 48(5), 323–334 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cater-Steel, A.P.: COTS developers lead best practice adoption. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 23–30. Los Alamitos (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chaves Weber, K., Ramalho de Araujo, E., Scaler, D., Pereira de Andrade, E., Cavalcanti da Rocha, A., Montoni, M.: MPS model-based software acquisition process improvement in brazil. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, pp. 110–122. IEEE, Washington (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cholez, H., Girard, F.: Maturity assessment and process improvement for information security management in small and medium enterprises. J. Softw. Evolut. Process 26(5), 496–503 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: The influence of SPI on business success in software SMEs: an empirical study. J. Syst. Softw. 85(10), 2356–2367 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: The situational factors that affect the software development process: towards a comprehensive reference framework. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(5), 433–447 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: An empirical examination of the extent of software process improvement in software SMEs. J. Softw. Evolut. Process 25(9), 981–998 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Coleman, G., O’Connor, R.: Investigating software process in practice: a grounded theory perspective. J. Syst. Softw. 81(5), 772–784 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cruz, P., Villarroel, R., Mancilla, F., Visconti, M.: A software testing process for the reference model of competisoft. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society, pp. 51–59. IEEE, Washington (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Davila, A., Basurto, C., Flores, L., Arisaca, R., Manrique, R., Sánchez, J., de Paula Pessôa, M.: The peruvian component of Competisoft project: Lesson learned from academic perspective. In: Proceedings of the Conferencia Latinoamericana En Informatica, pp. 1–7. IEEE, Washington (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. European Commission: The new SME definition. Enterprise and industry publications. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Eurostat: Annual enterprise statistics by size class for special aggregates of activities (nace rev. 2). Available from: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php (2014)

  31. Ferreira, A., Santos, G., Cerqueira, R., Montoni, M., Barreto, A., Barreto, A., Rocha, A.: Applying ISO 9001:2000, MPS.BR and CMMI to achieve software process maturity: Bl informatica’s pathway. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 642–651. IEEE, Washington (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ferreira, A.I.F., Santos, G., Cerqueira, R., Montoni, M., Barreto, A., Rocha, A.R., Figueiredo, S., Barreto, A., Filho, R.C.S., Lupo, P., Cerdeiral, C.: Taba workstation: Supporting software process improvement initiatives based on software standards and maturity models. In: Richardson, I., Runeson, P., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Software Process Improvement, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4257, pp. 207–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fontana, R.M., Meyer Jr., V., Reinehr, S., Malucelli, A.: Progressive outcomes: a framework for maturing in agile software development. J. Syst. Softw. 102, 88–108 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Garcia, I., Pacheco, C., A Calvo, J.: Quantitative project management in small and medium-sized software enterprises. Latin America Trans., IEEE (Revista IEEE America Latina) 12(3), 508–513 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Garcia, I., Pacheco, C., Cruz, D.: Adopting an RIA-based tool for supporting assessment, implementation and learning in software process improvement under the NMX-I-059/02-NYCE-2005 standard in small software enterprises. In: Proceedings of the ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, pp. 29–35. IEEE, Washington (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Garcia, I., Pacheco, C., Cruz, D., Calvo-Manzano, J.A.: Implementing the modeling-based approach for supporting the software process assessment in SPI Initiatives Inside a Small Software Company. In: Lee., R. (ed.) Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 377, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Garcia, I.A., Calvo-Manzano, J.A., Pacheco, C.L., Perez, C.A.: Software engineering education for a graduate course: a web-based tool for conducting process improvement initiatives with local industry collaboration. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 23(1), 117–136 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Giardino, C., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Paternoster, N., Gorschek, T., Abrahamsson, P.: What do we know about software development in startups? IEEE Softw. 31(5), 28–32 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Habra, N., Alexandre, S., Desharnais, J.M., Laporte, C.Y., Renault, A.: Initiating software process improvement in very small enterprises: experience with a light assessment tool. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50(7–8), 763–771 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hauck, J.C.R., Wangenheim, C.G.v., Souza, R.H.d., Thiry, M.: Process reference guides—support for improving software processes in alignment with reference models and standards. In: O’Connor, R.V., Baddoo, N., Smolander, K., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Software Process Improvement, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 16, pp. 70–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Horvat, R.V., Rozman, I., Györkös, J.: Managing the complexity of SPI in small companies. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 5(1), 45–54 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jeffery, R., Raffo, D., Armbrust, O., Huang, L. (eds.): Proceedings of International Conference on Software and System Process (ICSSP). IEEE, New Jersey (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jeners, S., Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V., Buglione, L., Lepmets, M.: Harmonizing software development processes with software development settings—a systematic approach. Systems. Software and Services Process Improvement, pp. 167–178. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  44. JTC 1, SC 7: Software engineering – lifecycle profiles for very small entities (VSEs) part 5-1-1: Management and engineering guide: Generic profile group: Basic profile. International Standard ISO/IEC TR 29110-5-1-2:2011(E), International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kalinowski, M., Weber, K., Franco, N., Barroso, E., Duarte, V., Zanetti, D., Santos, G.: Results of 10 years of software process improvement in Brazil based on the MPS-SW model. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, pp. 28–37. IEEE, Washington (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kautz, K.: Software process improvement in very small enterprises—does it pay? Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 4(4), 209–226 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Kitchenham, B., Charters, S.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical report EBSE-2007-01, Keele University, Staffordshire (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kroeger, T.A., Davidson, N.J., Cook, S.C.: Understanding the characteristics of quality for software engineering processes: a grounded theory investigation. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56(2), 252–271 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kuhrmann, M., Beecham, S.: Artifact-based software process improvement and management: a method proposal. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and System Process, pp. 119–123. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kuhrmann, M., Méndez Fernández, D.: From pragmatic to systematic software process improvement: an evaluated approach. IET Softw. 9(6), 157–165 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Laporte, C., O’Connor, R.: Systems and software engineering standards for very small entities: implementation and initial results. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Quality of Information and Communications Technology, pp. 38–47. IEEE, Washington (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Laporte, C.Y., Alexandre, S., O’Connor, R.V.: A software engineering lifecycle standard for very small enterprises. In: O’Connor, R.V., Baddoo, N., Smolander, K., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Software Process Improvement, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 16, pp. 129–141. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Laporte, C.Y., O’Connor, R.V.: A systems process lifecycle standard for very small entities: Development and pilot trials. In: Barafort, B., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 425, pp. 13–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Laporte, C.Y., Renault, A., Alexandre, S.: The application of international software engineering standards in very small enterprises. In: Oktaba, H., Piattini, M. (eds.) Software Process Improvement for Small and Medium Enterprises Techniques and Case Studies, pp. 42–70. Information Science Reference, Hershey, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Larrucea, X., Santamaria, I.: An industrial assessment for a multimodel framework. J. Softw. Evolut. Process 26(9), 837–845 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Laryd, A., Orci, T.: Dynamic CMM for small organizations. In: Proceedings of the Argentine Symposium on Software Engineering (2000). URL http://www.uml.org.cn/cmm/pdf/1116/laryd00dynamic.pdf

  57. Lee, S., Yong, H.S.: Agile software development framework in a small project environment. J. Inf. Process. Syst. 9(1), 69–88 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lester, N., Wilkie, F., McFall, D., Ware, M.: Evaluating the internal consistency of the base questions in the express process appraisal. In: Proceedings of the EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, pp. 289–296. IEEE, Washington (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Lester, N.G., Wilkie, F.G., McFall, D., Ware, M.P.: Investigating the role of CMMI with expanding company size for small- to medium-sized enterprises. J. Softw. Maint. Evolut. Res. Pract. 22(1), 17–31 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Luzuriaga, J.M., Martínez, R., Cechich, A.: Setting SPI practices in Latin America: an exploratory case study in the justice area. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 172–177. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Martínez-Ruiz, T., Pino, F.J., León-Pavón, E., García, F., Piattini, M.: Supporting the process assessment through a flexible software environment. In: Cordeiro, J., Shishkov, B., Ranchordas, A., Helfert, M. (eds.) Software and Data Technologies,Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 47, pp. 187–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Mas, A., Lluis Mesquida, A.: Software project management in small and very small entities. In: Proceedings of the Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 1–6. IEEE, Washington (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Mc Caffery, F., Richardson, I., Moller, P.: Automotive-adept: a lightweight assessment method for the automotive software industry. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 13(4), 345–353 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mc Caffery, F., Taylor, P.S., Coleman, G.: Adept: a unified assessment method for small software companies. IEEE Softw. 24(1), 24–31 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  65. McCaffery, F., Coleman, G.: Lightweight SPI assessments: what is the real cost? Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 14(5), 271–278 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. McCaffery, F., McFall, D., Wilkie, F.G.: Improving the express process appraisal method. In: Bomarius, F., Komi-Sirviö, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3547, pp. 286–298. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  67. McCaffery, F., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.): Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 364. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  68. McFall, D., Wilkie, F.G., McCaffery, F., Lester, N., Sterritt, R.: Software processes and process improvement in Northern Ireland. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Software and Systems Engineering and their Applications, pp. 1–10. Paris (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Mesquida, A.L., Mas, A.: A project management improvement program according to ISO/IEC 29110 and PMBOK. J. Softw. Evolut. Process 26(9), 846–854 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Mishra, D., Mishra, A.: Software process improvement methodologies for small and medium enterprises. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5089, pp. 273–288. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Mishra, D., Mishra, A.: Software process improvement in SMEs: a comparative view. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 6(1), 111–140 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Mitasiunas, A., Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.): Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 477. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Montoni, M., Santos, G., Rocha, A., Weber, K., de Araujo, E.: MPS model and TABA workstation: Implementing software process improvement initiatives in small settings. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Quality, p. 4 ff. IEEE, Washington (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Montoni, M., Santos, G., Rocha, A.R., Figueiredo, S., Cabral, R., Barcellos, R., Barreto, A., Soares, A., Cerdeiral, C., Lupo, P.: Taba workstation: Supporting software process deployment based on CMMI and MR-MPS.BR. In: Münch, J., Vierimaa, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4034, pp. 249–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Montoni, M.A., Rocha, A.R., Weber, K.C.: MPS.BR: a successful program for software process improvement in Brazil. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 14(5), 289–300 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Moreno, E., Sánchez-Gordón, M.L., Colomo-Palacios, R.: ISO/IEC 29110: current overview of the standard. Revista de Procesos y Métricas (RPM) 10(2), 24–40 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Moreno-Campos, E., Sánchez-Gordón, M.L., Colomo-Palacios, R.: Amescua Seco, A.: Towards measuring the impact of the ISO/IEC 29110 standard: a systematic review. In: Proceedings of European System and Software Process Improvement and Innovation Conference. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 425, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg, Luxembourg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  78. \(\tilde{{\rm {N}}}\)aupac, V., Arisaca, R., Dávila, A.: Software process improvement and certification of a small company using the NTP 291 100 (MoProSoft). In: Dieste, O., Jedlitschka, A., Juristo., N. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7343, pp. 32–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Nawrocki, J., Walter, B., Wojciechowski, A.: Toward maturity model for extreme programming. In: Proceedings of the Euromicro Conference, pp. 233–239. IEEE, Washington (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Nawrocki, J.R., Jasiñski, M., Walter, B., Wojciechowski, A.: Combining extreme programming with ISO 9000. In: Shafazand, H., Tjoa, A.M. (eds.) EurAsia-ICT 2002: Information and Communication Technology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2510, pp. 786–794. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Niazi, M.: Software process improvement: a road to success. In: Münch, J., Vierimaa, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4034, pp. 395–401. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Niazi, M.: An exploratory study of software process improvement implementation risks. J. Softw. Evolut. Process 24(8), 877–894 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. O’Connor, R.V.: Early stage adoption of ISO/IEC 29110 software project management practices: A case study. In: Mitasiunas, A., Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 477, pp. 226–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  84. O’Connor, R.V., Coleman, G.: An investigation of barriers to the adoption of software process best practice models. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 780–789 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  85. O’Connor, R.V., Laporte, C.Y.: Towards the provision of assistance for very small entities in deploying software lifecycle standards. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, pp. 4–7. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  86. O’Connor, R.V., Laporte, C.Y.: Deploying lifecycle profiles for very small entities: An early stage industry view. In: O’Connor, R.V., Rout, T., McCaffery, F., Dorling, A. (eds.) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 155, pp. 227–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  87. O’Connor, R.V., Laporte, C.Y.: Software project management in very small entities with ISO/IEC 29110. In: Winkler, D., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 301, pp. 330–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  88. O’Connor, R.V., Laporte, C.Y.: An innovative approach to the development of an international software process lifecycle standard for very small entities. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Syst. Approach 7(1), 1–22 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. O’Connor, R.V., Sanders, M.: Lessons from a pilot implementation of ISO/IEC 29110 in a group of very small irish companies. In: Woronowicz, T., Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 349, pp. 243–246. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  90. Oktaba, H., Garcia, F., Piattini, M., Ruiz, F., Pino, F., Alquicira, C.: Software process improvement: the competisoft project. Computer 40(10), 21–28 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. SME and Entrepreneurship Outlook 2005. OECD Publishing, Paris (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  92. Osorio Martinez, Z., Irrazabal, E., Garzas, J.: Toward improving agile mantema: measurement, control and evaluation of maintenance projects in SME’s. In: Proceedings of the Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 1–6. IEEE, Washington (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  93. Paternoster, N., Giardino, C., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Gorschek, T., Abrahamsson, P.: Software development in startup companies: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56(10), 1200–1218 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Pernstå l, J., Gorschek, T., Feldt, R., Florén, D.: Software process improvement in inter-departmental development of software-intensive automotive systems—a case study. In: Heidrich, J., Oivo, M., Jedlitschka, A., Baldassarre, M.T. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7983, pp. 93–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  95. Pettersson, F., Ivarsson, M., Gorschek, T., Öhman, P.: A practitioner’s guide to light weight software process assessment and improvement planning. J. Syst. Softw. 81(6), 972–995 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Pino, F.J., García, F., Piattini, M.: Software process improvement in small and medium software enterprises: a systematic review. Softw. Qual. Control J. 16(2), 237–261 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Pino, F.J., García, F., Piattini, M.: An integrated framework to guide software process improvement in small organizations. In: O’Connor, R.V., Baddoo, N., Gallego, J.C., Muslera, R.R., Smolander, K., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Software Process Improvement. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 42, pp. 213–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  98. Pino, F.J., Garcia, F., Piattini, M.: Key processes to start software process improvement in small companies. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 509–516. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  99. Pino, F.J., Pardo, C., García, F., Piattini, M.: Assessment methodology for software process improvement in small organizations. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52(10), 1044–1061 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Pino, F.J., Pedreira, O., García, F., Luaces, M.R., Piattini, M.: Using scrum to guide the execution of software process improvement in small organizations. J. Syst. Softw. 83(10), 1662–1677 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Pino, F.J., Ruiz, F., García, F., Piattini, M.: A software maintenance methodology for small organizations: Agile\(\_\)MANTEMA. J. Softw. Evolut. Process 24(8), 851–876 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  102. Pressman, R.: Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill Science, New York (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  103. Raninen, A., Ahonen, J.J., Sihvonen, H.M., Savolainen, P., Beecham, S.: LAPPI: a light-weight technique to practical process modeling and improvement target identification. J. Softw. Evolut. Process 25(9), 915–933 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Ribaud, V., Saliou, P.: Process assessment issues of the ISO/IEC 29110 emerging standard. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, pp. 24–27. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  105. Ribaud, V., Saliou, P., Laporte, C.: Experience management for very small entities: Improving the copy-paste model. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, pp. 311–318. IEEE, Washington (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  106. Ribaud, V., Saliou, P., O’Connor, R.V., Laporte, C.Y.: Software engineering support activities for very small entities. In: Riel, A., O’Connor, R., Tichkiewitch, S., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 99, pp. 165–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  107. Richardson, I.: SPI models: what characteristics are required for small software development companies? Softw. Qual. J. 10(2), 101–114 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  108. Richardson, I., Ryan, K.: Software process improvements in a very small company. Softw. Qual. Prof. 3(2), 23–35 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  109. Richardson, I., von Wangenheim, G.C.: Why are small software organizations different? IEEE Softw. 24(1), 18–22 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Rios, B., Vargas, M., Espinoza, J., Peralta, M.: Experiences on the implementation of MoProSoft and assessment of processes under the NMX-I-059/02-NYCE-2005 standard in a small software development enterprise. In: Proceedings of the Mexican International Conference on Computer Science, pp. 323–328. IEEE, Washington (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  111. da Rocha, A., Montoni, M., Weber, K., de Araujo, E.: A nationwide program for software process improvement in Brazil. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, pp. 167–176. IEEE, Washington (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  112. Rocha, A.R., Montoni, M., Santos, G., Mafra, S., Figueiredo, S., Albuquerque, A., Mian, P.: Reference model for software process improvement: A brazilian experience. In: Richardson, I., Abrahamsson, P., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Software Process Improvement. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3792, pp. 130–141. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  113. Rozman, I., Horvat, R.V., Györkös, J., Hericòko, M.: PROCESSUS—integration of SEI CMM and ISO quality models. Softw. Qual. J. 6(1), 37–63 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Sánchez-Gordón, M.L., Colomo-Palacios, R., Amescua, A.: Towards measuring the impact of the spi manifesto: a systematic review. In: Proceedings of European System and Software Process Improvement and Innovation Conference, pp. 100–110. DELTA, Dundalk Institute of Technology, Ireland (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  115. Sánchez-Gordón, M.L., O’Connor, R.V., Colomo-Palacios, R.: Evaluating vses viewpoint and sentiment towards the ISO/IEC 29110 standard: a two country grounded theory study. In: Rout, T., O’Connor, R., Dorling, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the SPICE Conference, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 526. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  116. Santos, G., Kalinowski, M., Rocha, A., Travassos, G., Weber, K., Antonioni, J.: MPS.BR: A tale of software process improvement and performance results in the Brazilian software industry. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, pp. 412–417. IEEE, Washington (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  117. Santos, G., Kalinowski, M., Rocha, A., Travassos, G., Weber, K., Antonioni, J.: MPS.BR program and MPS model: Main results, benefits and beneficiaries of software process improvement in Brazil. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, pp. 137–142. IEEE, Washington (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  118. Santos, G., Montoni, M., Vasconcellos, J., Figueiredo, S., Cabral, R., Cerdeiral, C., Katsurayama, A., Lupo, P., Zanetti, D., Rocha, A.: Implementing software process improvement initiatives in small and medium-size enterprises in brazil. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, pp. 187–198. IEEE, Washington (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  119. Savolainen, P., Sihvonen, H.M., Ahonen, J.J.: SPI with lightweight software process modeling in a small software company. In: Abrahamsson, P., Baddoo, N., Margaria, T., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Software Process Improvement. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4764, pp. 71–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  120. Schoeffel, P., Benitti, F.B.V.: Factors of influence in software process improvement: a comparative survey between micro and small enterprises (MSE) and medium and large enterprises (MLE). IEEE Latin America Trans. 10(2), 1634–1643 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Schweigert, T., Nevalainen, R., Vohwinkel, D., Korsaa, M., Biro, M.: Agile maturity model: oxymoron or the next level of understanding. In: Mas, A., Mesquida, A., Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 290, pp. 289–294. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  122. Scott, L., Jeffery, R., Carvalho, L., D’Ambra, J., Rutherford, P.: Practical software process improvement—the IMPACT project. In: Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference, pp. 182–189. IEEE, Washington (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  123. Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering, 9 edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  124. Staples, M., Niazi, M., Jeffery, R., Abrahams, A., Byatt, P., Murphy, R.: An exploratory study of why organizations do not adopt CMMI. J. Syst. Softw. 80(6), 883–895 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Sulayman, M., Mendes, E.: An extended systematic review of software process improvement in small and medium web companies. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, pp. 134–143. IET, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  126. Sulayman, M., Urquhart, C., Mendes, E., Seidel, S.: Software process improvement success factors for small and medium web companies: a qualitative study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(5), 479–500 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Takeuchi, M., Kohtake, N., Shirasaka, S., Koishi, Y., Shioya, K.: Report on an assessment experience based on ISO/IEC 29110. J. Softw. Evolut. Process 26(3), 306–312 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Taylor, P.S., Greer, D., Sage, P., Coleman, G., McDaid, K., Lawthers, I., Corr, R.: Applying an agility/discipline assessment for a small software organisation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4034, pp. 290–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  129. Theocharis, G., Kuhrmann, M., Münch, J., Diebold, P.: Is water-scrum-fall reality? on the use of agile and traditional development practices. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9459, pp. 149–166. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  130. Tigre, P.B., Marques, F.S. (eds.): Desafíos y oportunidades de la industria del software en América Latina, primera edn. Mayol Ediciones S.A, Colombia (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  131. UNCTAD: Information economy report 2012: the software industry and developing countries. Technical report, United Nations Publications, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  132. Valdés, G., Astudillo, H., Visconti, M., López, C.: The tutelkan SPI framework for smallsettings: A methodology transfer vehicle. In: Riel, A., O’Connor, R., Tichkiewitch, S. Messnarz, R. (eds.) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 99, pp. 142–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  133. Valdés, G., Visconti, M., Astudillo, H.: The tutelkan reference process: A reusable process model for enabling SPI in small settings. In: O’Connor, R.V., Pries-Heje, J., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Systems, Software and Service Process Improvement, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 172, pp. 179–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  134. Valtanen, A., Ahonen, J.J.: Big improvements with small changes: improving the processes of a small software company. In: Jedlitschka, A., Salo, O. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5089, pp. 258–272. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  135. Valtierra, C., Munoz, M., Mejia, J.: Characterization of software processes improvement needs in SMEs. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechatronics. Electronics and Automotive Engineering, pp. 223–228. IEEE, Washington (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  136. Vargas, E., Oktaba, H., Guardati, S., Laureano, A.: Agents, case-based reasoning and their relation to the mexican software process (MoProSoft). In: Proceedings of the International Computer Software and Applications Conference, vol. 2, pp. 326–334. IEEE, Washington (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  137. Varkoi, T.: Process assessment in very small entities—an ISO/IEC 29110 based method. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, pp. 436–440. IEEE, Washington (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  138. Vijayasarathy, L., Butler, C.: Choice of software development methodologies—do project, team and organizational characteristics matter? IEEE Softw. (99), 1ff. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  139. Villarroel, R., Gómez, Y., Gajardo, R., Rodríguez, O.: Implementation of an improvement cycle using the competisoft methodological framework and the tutelkan platform. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society, pp. 97–104. IEEE, Washington (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  140. von Wangenheim, C.G., Anacleto, A., Salviano, C.: Helping small companies assess software processes. IEEE Softw. 23(1), 91–98 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. von Wangenheim, C.G., Varkoi, T., Salviano, C.F.: Standard based software process assessments in small companies. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 11(3), 329–335 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Wangenheim, C.G.v., Weber, S., Hauck, J.C.R., Trentin, G.: Experiences on establishing software processes in small companies. Inf. Softw. Technol. 48(9), 890–900 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  143. Weber, K.C., Araújo, E.E.R., Rocha, A.R.C.d., Machado, C.A.F., Scalet, D., Salviano, C.F.: Brazilian software process reference model and assessment method. In: Yolum, P., Güngör, T., Gürgen, F., Özturan, C. (eds.) Computer and Information Sciences. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3733, pp. 402–411. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  144. Wilkie, F.G., Mc Caffery, F., McFall, D., Lester, N., Wilkinson, E.: A low-overhead method for software process appraisal. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 12(4), 339–349 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  145. Wilkie, F.G., McFall, D., McCaffery, F.: An evaluation of CMMI process areas for small- to medium-sized software development organisations. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 10(2), 189–201 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Woronowicz, T., Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.): Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 349. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  147. Zahran, S.: Software Process Improvement-Practical Guidelines for Business Success. Addison Wesley, Boston (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  148. Zarour, M., Abran, A., Desharnais, J.M.: Evaluation of software process assessment methods – case study. In: O’Connor, R.V., Rout, T., McCaffery, F., Dorling, A. (eds.) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 155, pp. 42–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  149. Zarour, M., Desharnais, J.M., Alarifi, A., Habra, N., Cassiers, G., Robaeys, A.: Gained experience by making intervention to improve software process in very small organizations. In: Mas, A., Mesquida, A., Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 290, pp. 51–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Av. Universidad 30, Leganés, CP 28911, Madrid, Spain

    Mary-Luz Sánchez-Gordón & Antonio de Amescua Seco

  2. Department of Computer Science, Østfold University College, BRA Veien 4, 1783, Halden, Norway

    Ricardo Colomo-Palacios

  3. Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland

    Rory V. O’Connor

Authors
  1. Mary-Luz Sánchez-Gordón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ricardo Colomo-Palacios
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antonio de Amescua Seco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rory V. O’Connor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary-Luz Sánchez-Gordón .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

    Marco Kuhrmann

  2. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Jürgen Münch

  3. University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

    Ita Richardson

  4. Technische Universität Clausthal, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany

    Andreas Rausch

  5. Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

    He Zhang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sánchez-Gordón, ML., Colomo-Palacios, R., de Amescua Seco, A., O’Connor, R.V. (2016). The Route to Software Process Improvement in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises. In: Kuhrmann, M., Münch, J., Richardson, I., Rausch, A., Zhang, H. (eds) Managing Software Process Evolution. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31545-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31545-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31543-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31545-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation