Skip to main content

The EDIE Method – Towards an Approach to Collaboration-Based Persuasive Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9638))

Abstract

This paper presents the initial steps towards a collaboration-based method for persuasive design – the EDIE method (Explore, Design, Implement, Evaluate). The method is inspired by Design-Based Research, but developed to combine different design approaches that have dominated the persuasive technology field over the past decade. The rhetorical notion of Kairos is considered a key element in the EDIE method, resulting in a distinct focus on participatory design and constructive ethics. The method is explained through a practical example of developing persuasive learning designs in collaboration with the Danish Ministry of Defence and the Installation Management Command.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Reeves, T.C.: Design research from a technology perspective. Educ. Des. Res. 1(3), 52–66 (2006)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5033, pp. 164–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Lockton, D., Harrison, D., Stanton, N.A.: The design with intent method: a design tool for influencing user behaviour. Appl. Ergonomics 41(3), 382–392 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis, J.: Generating directions for persuasive technology design with the inspiration card workshop. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 262–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Torning, K., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Persuasive system design: state of the art and future directions. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology. ACM, Claremont (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gram-Hansen, S.B., Ryberg, T.: Persuasion, learning and context adaptation. Special Issue Int. J. Conceptual Struct. Smart Appl. 1(2), 28–37 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kinneavy, J.L.: Kairos in classical and modern rhetorical theory. In: Sipiora, P., Baumlin, J.S. (eds.) Rhetoric and Kairos, Essays in History, Theory and Practice. State University of New York Press, Albany (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Amiel, T., Reeves, T.C.: Design based research and educational technology: rethinking technology and the research agenda. Educ. Technol. Soc. 11, 29–40 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gram-Hansen, S.B., Ryberg, T.: Acttention – influencing communities of practice with persuasive learning designs. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 184–195. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, J.: Design methods for ethical persuasive computing. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology. ACM, Claremont (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, J.: Towards participatory design of ambient persuasive technology. In: Proceedings of Pervasive 2008 Workshop, Australia, Sydney (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gram-Hansen, S.B., Ryberg, T.: From participatory design and ontological ethics, towards an approach to constructive ethics. In: Ethicomp 2015, ACM SIGCAS, Leicester (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oinas-Kukkoen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24, 28 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ham, J., Midden, C.: Ambient persuasive technology needs little cognitive effort: the differential effects of cognitive load on lighting feedback versus factual feedback. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 132–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller, G.R.: On being persuaded, some basic distinctions. In: Dillard, J.P., Pfau, M. (eds.) The Persuasion Handbook, Developments in Theory and Practice. Saga Publications, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Operate, Målgruppeanalyse og Segmentering (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The practical exemplification presented in this paper was arranged and conducted in collaboration with Thilde Møller Larsen from The Defence Installation Management Command, Denmark

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Burri Gram-Hansen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gram-Hansen, S.B. (2016). The EDIE Method – Towards an Approach to Collaboration-Based Persuasive Design. In: Meschtscherjakov, A., De Ruyter, B., Fuchsberger, V., Murer, M., Tscheligi, M. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9638. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31510-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31510-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31509-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31510-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics