Breast Calcifications in Full Breast Ultrasonography

  • Aristida Colan-Georges


Breast calcifications are important findings in the mammographic diagnosis, but they have reduced significance as descriptors in breast US, because of the low sensibility for malignant microcalcifications and for isolated small benign calcifications; moreover, US as sectional imagery cannot characterize their shape and full distribution as it is the practice in radiology, the specificity being reduced, too. However, the aspect of calcifications found in US is presented in this chapter, with illustrations of FBU evaluation.


Breast calcifications Imaging detecting microcalcifications 


  1. 1.
    Anderson ME, Soo MS, Bentley RC, Trahey GE (1997) The detection of breast microcalcifications with medical ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am 101(1):29–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Urban MW, Silva GT, Fatemi M, Greenleaf JF (2006) Multifrequency vibro-acoustography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25(10):1284–1295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alizad A, Whaley DH, Greenleaf JF, Fatemi M (2006) Critical issues in breast imaging by vibro-acoustography. Ultrasonics 44(Suppl 1):e217–e220, Epub 2006 Jun 30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rosen PP et al (2009) Rosen’s breast pathology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 39–166Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gufler H, Buitrago-Téllez CH, Madjar H, Allmann KH, Uhl M, Rohr-Reyes A (2000) Ultrasound demonstration of mammographically detected microcalcifications. Acta Radiol 41(3):217–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Soo MS, Rosen EL, Baker JA et al (2001) Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:1167–1170 [CrossRef]CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Skaane P (1999) Ultrasonography as adjunct to mammography in the evaluation of breast tumors. Acta Radiol 420(suppl):1–47Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moy L, Slanetz P, Moore R et al (2002) Specificity of mammography and ultrasound in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review. Radiology 225:176–181 [Abstract]CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sickles EA (1986) Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 146:661–663 [CrossRef]CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whang KW, Cho KR, Seo BK et al (2003) Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: radiologic and histopathological findings. Radiographics 23:881–895, © RSNACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Teh WL (2002) Chapter 10: High-frequency ultrasound in breast calcification. In: Evans A, Ellis I, Pinder S, Wilson R (eds) A diagnostic manual. Greenwich Medical Media, London, pp 139–148Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Intra M, Veronesi P, Mazzarol G et al (2003) Axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Arch Surg 138:309–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ansari B, Ogston SA, Purdie CA, Adamson DJ, Brown DC, Thompson AM (2008) Meta-analysis of sentinel node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Br J Surg 95:547–554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tot T, Tabár L, Dean PB (2002) Practical breast pathology. Thieme D, New York. ISBN ISBN#: 1588900916Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL (2003) Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Roentgenol 180(4):941–948. [Medline]. Available:
  16. 16.
    Majid SA, Shaw de Paredes E, Doherty DR, Sharma NR, Salvador X (2003) Missed breast carcinoma: pitfalls and pearls. RadioGraphics 23(4):881–895. doi: 10.1148/rg.234025083 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aristida Colan-Georges
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiology and Imaging DiagnosisCounty Emergency Clinical HospitalCraiovaRomania

Personalised recommendations