Skip to main content

Digital Religion

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

Although it seems paradoxical, religion in all its forms and functions is transferring and blending with the digital world. This new relationship is altering how we do religion and also how religion impacts and influences the society and culture. Digital religion is an intermingling of our modern mediated society with contemporary religious beliefs and practices. Digital religion is not just about having “religion” on digital media, rather it is a blending of all of the societal and cultural components we associate with religion with all of the elements we associate with a digital society. Two current theories have developed that seem to be gaining traction in the field studying religion and digital culture. Campbell has developed a theory called “networked religion,” and Hoover and Echchaibi are developing the concept of “third spaces of digital religion.” By examining several case studies, this chapter will show that each theory has its own merits. Networked religion may be more helpful in examining official religious activity, while third spaces may be more helpful in studying everyday or lived religion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahlsten, N. (2015). Firms digitize prayer to bring people closer to God. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/29/power-of-prayer-firms-digitize-prayer-to-bring-peo/. Accessed 1 Dec 2015.

  • Anand, D. (2000). (Re) Imagining nationalism: Identity and representation in the Tibetan Diaspora of South Asia. Contemporary South Asia, 9(3), 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardley, J. (2011). Learning the art of democracy? Continuity and change in the Tibetan Government-in-exile. Contemporary South Asia, 12(3), 349–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, E. (2005). Crossing the boundary: New challenges to religious authority and control as a consequence of access to the Internet. In M. Hojsgaard & M. Warburg (Eds.), Religion and cyberspace (pp. 67–86). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict XVI. (2013). Social networks: Portals of truth and faith; New spaces for evangelization. http://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/messages/communications/documents/hf_ben-xvi_mes_20130124_47th-world-communications-day.html. Accessed 12 May 2013.

  • Beyer, P. (2006). Religions in global society. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. (1997). Religion in cyberspace: Building upon the past. Paper presented at the Institute for the History of religion, Turku, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasher, B. (2001). Give me that online religion. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. (2000). Tibet, democracy and the Internet bazaar. Democratization, 7(1), 157–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, J. (2012). Digital diasporas’ challenge to traditional power: The case of TibetBoard. Review of International Studies, 38, 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H. (2005). Spiritualising the Internet: Uncovering discourse and narrative of religious Internet usage. Online: Heidelberg Journal of Religion on the Internet, 1(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H. (2007). Who’s got the power? Religious authority and the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 1043–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H. (2010). Bloggers and religious authority online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H. (2012). Understanding the relationship between religion online and offline in a networked society. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 80(1), 64–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H. (Ed.). (2013). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H., & Grieve, G. (Eds.). (2014). Playing with religion in video games. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the networked society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, A. (2015).Crowdfunding a new church: A multimodal analysis of faith-related giving rhetoric on Indiegogo. Online: Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. (2015). From radical communalism to virtual community: An ethnography of the Family International. Unpublished MA thesis. Royal Roads University, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drissel, D. (2008). Digitizing dharma: Computer-mediated mobilizations of Tibetan Buddhist youth. International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities & Nations, 8(5), 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echchaibi, N. (2014). So what is this third space of religion in the digital age? https://thirdspacesblog.wordpress.com/2014/05/27/so-what-is-this-third-space-of-religion-in-the-digital-age/. Accessed 5 Nov 2014.

  • Echchaibi, N., Liberman, R., & Whitehead, W. (2013). Third spaces, religion and spirituality in the digital age (Selected papers of internet research). http://spir.aoir.org/index.php/spir/article/view/867. Accessed 20 Oct 2014.

  • Francis. (2015). Encyclical letter Laudato Si’ of the Holy father Francis on care of our common home. http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html. Accessed 18 June 2015.

  • Gendron, C., & Cox, D. (2015). Catholics twice as likely to agree with Pope Francis on climate change than disagree, but many still unfamiliar with views. Public Religion Research Institute. http://publicreligion.org/2015/08/catholics-twice-as-likely-to-agree-with-pope-francis-on-climate-change-than-disagree-but-many-still-unfamiliar-with-views/#.Vm9knUorJhE. Accessed 5 Nov 2015.

  • Geraci, R. (2014). Virtually sacred: Myth and meaning in World of Warcraft and Second Life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grieve, G. P. (1995). Imagining a virtual religious community: Neo-pagans on the Internet. Chicago Anthropology Exchange, 7, 98–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieve, G. P. (2013). Digital religion. In H. Campbell (Ed.), Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds (pp. 104–118). Routledge: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzek, D. (2015). Discovering the digital authority: Twitter as reporting tools for papal activities. Online: Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet, 9(1), 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helland, C. (2000). Online Religion/Religion Online and Virtual Communitas. In J. Hadden & D. Cowan (Eds.), Religion on the Internet: Research prospects and promises (pp. 205–224). New York: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helland, C. (2002). Surfing for Salvation. Religion, 32(4), 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helland, C. (2005). Online religion as lived religion: Methodological issues in the study of religious participation on the Internet. Online: Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet, 1(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helland, C. (2007). Diaspora on the electronic frontier: Developing virtual connections with sacred homelands. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 956–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helland, C. (2012). Online religion in Canada: From hype to hyperlink. In L. Beaman (Ed.), Religion and Canadian society: Traditions, transitions, and innovations (pp. 375–390). Toronto: Canadian Scholar’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helland, C. (2015). Virtual Tibet: Maintaining identity through internet networks. In G. Grieve & D. Veidlinger (Eds.), The Pixel in the lotus: Buddhism, the Internet, and digital media (pp. 213–241). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill-Smith, C. (2011). Cyberpilgrimage: The (virtual) reality of online pilgrimage experience. Religion Compass, 5(6), 236–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of religion: A theory of the media as agents of religious change. Northern Lights: Film and Media Studies Yearbook, 6, 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, B., & Wellman, B. (2011). The Immanent Internet Redux. In P. H. Cheong, P. Fischer-Nielsen, S. Gelfgren, & C. Ess (Eds.), Digital religion, social media and culture: Perspectives, practices and futures (pp. 43–62). Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, S. (2006). Religion in the media age. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, S. (2013). Concluding thoughts: Imagining the religious in and through the digital. In H. Campbell (Ed.), Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds (pp. 104–118). Routledge: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, S., & Echchaibi, N. (2012). The third spaces of digital religion: A working paper. Unpublished working paper, Center for Media, Religion, and Culture, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, S., & Echchaibi, N. (2014). Media theory and the ‘third spaces of digital religion’. https://thirdspacesblog.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/third-spaces-and-media-theory-essay-2-0.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2016.

  • Hope Cheong, P. (2013). Authority. In H. Campbell (Ed.), Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds (pp. 72–87). Routledge: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsfield, P. (2015). From Jesus to the Internet: A history of Christianity and media. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Information Warfare Monitor. (2009). Tracking GhostNet: Investigating a cyber espionage network. http://www.infowar-monitor.net/2009/09/tracking-ghostnet-investigating-acyber-espionage-network/. Accessed 16 Dec 2015.

  • Kolas, A. (1996). Tibetan nationalism: The politics of religion. Journal of Peace Research, 33(1), 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochhead, D. (1986). UCHUG: The electronic network of the United Church of Canada. http://cgi.gjhost.com/~cgi/mt/netweaverarchive/000148.html. Accessed 18 June 2011.

  • Lundby, K. (2012). Participatory of vicarious? When networked belonging challenges networks of belonging. OBS* Observatorio, Special Issue, 101–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundby, K. (2013). Theoretical frameworks for approaching religion and new media. In H. Campbell (Ed.), Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds (pp. 225–237). Routledge: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, G. (2012). The sacred in the modern world: A cultural sociological approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1994). Space, Place and Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, M. (2008). Lived religion: Faith and practice in everyday life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McLagan, M. (1996). Computing for Tibet: Virtual politics in the post-cold war era. In G. E. Marcus (Ed.), Connected: Engagements with media (pp. 159–194). London: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miczek, N. (2008). Online rituals in virtual worlds: Christian online services between dynamics and stability. Online: Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet, 3(1), 144–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (2011). Aura and effect: The media of religions. Paper presentation, International Research Centre for Cultural Studies, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, E. (2006). Tibetan religious expression and identity: Transformations in exile. In E. Arweck & W. Keenan (Eds.), Materialising religion: Expressions, performance, and ritual (pp. 175–189). Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namgyal Monastery. (1996). Blessings of cyberspace. http://www.namgyal.org/blessings-prayers/blessings-of-cyberspace/. Accessed 16 Dec 2015.

  • Nowak, M. (1984). Tibetan refugees: Youth and the generation of meaning. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, S. (1996). Cyberspace as sacred space: Communicating religion on computer networks. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 64(4), 781–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinchbeck, D., & Stevens, B. (2006). Ritual co-location: Play, consciousness and reality in artificial environments. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.105.8448&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 15 June 2010.

  • Radde-Antweiler, K. (2006). Rituals online: Transferring and designing rituals. Online: Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet, 2(1), 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramji, R. (2001). Building community word by word. In E. Mazur & K. McCarthy (Eds.), God in the details: American religion in popular culture (pp. 267–280). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samphel, T. (2004). Virtual Tibet: The media. In D. Bernstorff & H. von Welck (Eds.), Exile as challenge: The Tibetan Diaspora (pp. 167–185). New Delhi: Orient Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. N. (1998). Faith, reason, and charisma: Rudolf Sohm, Max Weber, and the theology of Grace. Sociological Inquiry, 68(1), 32–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiller, H., & Franz, T. (2004). New ties, old ties and lost ties: The use of the Internet in diaspora. New Media & Society, 6, 731–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. (2007). Religious authority and the new media. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(2), 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, S. (2011). Tibet a history. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. (2013). You are what you install: Religious authenticity and identity in mobile apps. In H. Campbell (Ed.), Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds (pp. 199–206). Routledge: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. [1922] (1978). In G. Roth, & C. Wittich (Eds.), Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen-Bridge, J. (2011). Multiple modernities and the Tibetan diaspora. South Asian Diaspora, 3(1), 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, L. (2012). Religion and change in modern Britain. In L. Woodhead & R. Catto (Eds.), Religion and change in modern Britain (pp. 1–33). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaleski, J. (1997). The soul of cyberspace: How new technology is changing our spiritual lives. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Helland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Helland, C. (2016). Digital Religion. In: Yamane, D. (eds) Handbook of Religion and Society. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31395-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31395-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61816-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31395-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics