Skip to main content

Enabling Military Coalition Command and Control with Interoperating Simulations as a System of Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 442))

  • 568 Accesses

Abstract

This paper reports on development of standardized methods for military coalitions to interoperate command and control (C2) systems with simulation systems (C2SIM). Such a system-of-systems results in improved functionality and timeliness for participants in national configurations, with even more benefit in coalitions. Command and control software systems enable commanders, staffs, and other participants to exchange tasking information (Orders) and status information for situational awareness (Reports). Simulations are useful as C2 system elements for analysis and to stimulate training and mission rehearsal. C2SIM enables plug-and-play interoperation of C2 and simulation systems. It has particular value in a coalition environment, where participants from each nation use their own C2 system and simulations. The paper focuses on North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO) activities in C2SIM, describing the technical approach and software used to achieve interoperability, and provides examples of success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ababneh, M., Pullen, J.: An open source graphical user interface surrogate C2 system for battle management language experimentation. In: International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium 2011, Québec Canada (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abbott, J., Pullen, J., Levine, S.: Answering the question: Why a BML standard has taken so long to be established? In: IEEE Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando FL, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blais, C., Galvin, K., Hieb, M.: Coalition battle management language (C-BML) study group report. In: IEEE Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando FL, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carey, S., Kleiner, M., Hieb, M., Brown, R.: Standardizing battle management language—a vital move towards the army transformation, paper 01S-SIW-067. In: IEEE Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando FL, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heffner, K., Khimeche, L., Pullen, J.: MSG-048 technical activity experimentation to evaluate the applicability of a coalition battle management language in NATO. In: NATO Modeling and Symposium 2010. Utrecht, Netherlands (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heffner, K., Blais, C., Gupton, K.: Strategies for alignment and convergence of C-BML and MSDL. In: IEEE Fall 2012 Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando FL, USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hieb, M., Mackay, S., Powers, M., Kleiner, M., Pullen, J.: The environment in network centric operations: a framework for command and control. In: 12th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Newport, RI, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. IEEE Standards Association: IEEE Standard 1516, High Level Architecture for Modeling and Simulation (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. IEEE Standards Association: IEEE Standard 1278.1, Distributed Interactive Simulation (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khimeche, L., de Champs, P.: M&S in decision support for course of action analysis, APLET, Paper 04F-SIW-006. In: 2004 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Multilateral Interoperability Programme: The Joint C3 Information Exchange Data Model (JC3IEDM) Edition 3.1a. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. NATO Collaboration Support Office: Final Report of MSG-085 Standardization for C2-Simulation Interoperability (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pullen J., Corner, D., Nicklas, L.: Supporting NATO C2-simulation experimentation with scripted web services. In: 16th International Command and Control Research and Technology 
Symposium, Québec Canada (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pullen, J., Corner, D., Gustavsson, P. and Grönkvist, M.: Incorporating C2—simulation interoperability services into an operational C2 system. In: International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium 2013, Alexandria, VA, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pullen, J., Corner, D., Wittman, R., Brook, A., Gustavsson, P., Schade U., Remmersmann, T.: Multi-schema and multi-server advances for C2-simulation interoperability in MSG-085. In: NATO Modelling and Simulation Symposium 2013, Sydney, Australia (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pullen, J., Wittman, R., Khimeche, L., Burland, B., Ruth, J., Hyndøy, J.: Coalition C2-simulation history and status. In: NATO Modelling and Simulation Symposium 2014, Washington DC, USA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pullen, J., Khimeche, L.: Advances in systems and technologies toward interoperating operational military C2 and simulation systems. In: International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium 2014, Alexandria VA, USA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pullen, J., Khimeche, L., Cuneo, X., Schade, U., Remmersmann, T.: Linking C2-simulation interoperation servers to form distributed server systems. In: International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium 2015, Annapolis, MD, USA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pullen, J.: Enabling military coalition command and control with interoperating simulations. In: 5th International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications, Colmar, France (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Remmersmann, T., Schade, U., Khimeche, L., Gautreau, B.: Lessons recognized: how to combine BML and MSDL. In: IEEE Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando FL, USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization: Standard for: Military Scenario Definition Language (MSDL) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization: Standard for: Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sudnikovich, W., Pullen, J., Kleiner, M., Carey, S.: Extensible Battle Management Language as a Transformation Enabler. Simulation 80, 669–680 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wittman, R.: OneSAF as an in-stride mission command asset. In: International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium 2014, Alexandria, VA, USA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Mark Pullen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mark Pullen, J. (2016). Enabling Military Coalition Command and Control with Interoperating Simulations as a System of Systems. In: Obaidat, M., Kacprzyk, J., Ören, T., Filipe, J. (eds) Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 442. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31295-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31295-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31294-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31295-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics