Advertisement

A Multi-objective Bayesian Sequential Design Based on Pareto Optimality

  • Matteo BorrottiEmail author
  • Antonio Pievatolo
Conference paper
Part of the Contributions to Statistics book series (CONTRIB.STAT.)

Abstract

Complexity arises in different fields of application. The increasing number of variables and system responses used to describe an experimental problem limits the applicability of classical approaches from Design of Experiments (DOE) and Sequential Experimental Design (SED). In this situation, more effort should be put into developing methodological approaches for complex multi-response experimental problems. In this work, we develop a novel design technique based on the incorporation of the Pareto optimality concept into the Bayesian sequential design framework. One of the crucial aspects of the approach involves the selection method of the next design points based on current information and the chosen system responses. The novel sequential approach has been tested on a simulated case study.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been carried out as a part of the FIDEAS project (Fabbrica Intelligente per la Deproduzione Avanzata e Sostenibile) co-funded within the Framework Agreement between Regione Lombardia and CNR.

References

  1. 1.
    Borrotti, M., Pievatolo, A., Critelli, I., Degiorgi, A., Colledani, M.: A computer-aided methodology for the optimization of electrostatic separation processes in recycling. Appl. Stoch. Models Bus. (2015, in press)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chaloner, K., Verdinelli, I.: Bayesian experimental design: a review. Stat. Sci. 10, 273–304 (1995)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheng, Y., Shen, Y.: Bayesian adaptive designs for clinical trials. Biometrika 92, 633–646 (2005)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grübler, A.: Technology and Global Change. Cambridge University Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu, L., Anderson-Cook, C.M., Robinson, T.J.: Optimization of design experiments based on multiple criteria utilizing a Pareto frontier. Technometrics 53, 353–365 (2011)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pauwels, E., Lajaunie, C., Vert, J.P.: A Bayesian active learning strategy for sequential experimental design in systems biology. BMC Syst. Biol. 8, 1–11 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Müller, W.G., Pronzato, L., Rendas, J., Waldl, H.: Efficient prediction designs for random fields. Appl. Stoch. Models Bus. 31, 178–194 (2015)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sambo, F., Borrotti, M., Mylona, K.: A coordinate-exchange two-phase local search algorithm for the D- and I-optimal designs of split-plot experiments. Comput. Stat. 71, 1193–1207 (2014)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verdinelli, I., Kadane, J.B.: Bayesian design for maximizing information and outcome. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87, 510–515 (1992)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNR-IMATIMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations