Skip to main content

Design of Computer Experiments Using Competing Distances Between Set-Valued Inputs

Part of the Contributions to Statistics book series (CONTRIB.STAT.)

Abstract

In many numerical simulation experiments from natural sciences and engineering, inputs depart from the classical moderate-dimensional vector set-up and include more complex objects such as parameter fields or maps. In this case, and when inputs are generated using stochastic methods or taken from a pre-existing large set of candidates, one often needs to choose a subset of “representative” elements because of practical restrictions. Here we tackle the design of experiments based on distances or dissimilarity measures between input maps, and more specifically between inputs of set-valued nature. We consider the problem of choosing experiments given dissimilarities such as the Hausdorff or Wasserstein distances but also of eliciting adequate dissimilarities not only based on practitioners’ expertise but also on quantitative and graphical diagnostics including nearest neighbour cross-validation and non-Euclidean structural analysis. The proposed approaches are illustrated on an original uncertainty quantification case study from mechanical engineering, where using partitioning around medoids with ad hoc distances gives promising results in terms of stratified sampling.

Keywords

  • Hausdorff Distance
  • Distance Method
  • Subsample Size
  • Input Configuration
  • Empirical Variograms

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31266-8_15
  • Chapter length: 9 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-31266-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Adler, R.J., Taylor, J.E.: Random Fields and Geometry. Springer, New York (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cast3M software: http://www-cast3m.cea.fr. Accessed Dec 2015

  3. Cressie, N.A.C.: Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New York (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Curriero, F.C.: On the use of non-Euclidean distance measures in geostatistics. Math. Geol. 38 (8), 907–926 (2006)

    CrossRef  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ginsbourger, D., Rosspopoff, B., Pirot, G., Durrande, N., Renard, P.: Distance-based kriging relying on proxy simulations for inverse conditioning. Adv. Water Res. 52, 275–291 (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.: The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer, New York (2009)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson, M.E., Moore, L.M., Ylvisaker, D.: Minimax and maximin distance designs. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 26, 131–148 (1990)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Molchanov, I.: Theory of Random Sets. Springer, London (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Radovanović, M., Nanopoulos, A., Ivanović, M.: Hubs in space: popular nearest neighbors in high-dimensional data. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 2487–2531 (2010)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Schuhmacher, D., Xia, A.: A new metric between distributions of point processes. Adv. Appl. Probab. 40, 651–672 (2008)

    CrossRef  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. von Luxburg, U.: Statistical learning with similarity and dissimilarity functions. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Part of this work has been conducted within the frame of the ReDice Consortium, which gathered industrial (CEA, EDF, IFPEN, IRSN, Renault) and academic (Ecole des Mines de Saint-Etienne, INRIA, and the University of Bern) partners around advanced methods for Computer Experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Ginsbourger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ginsbourger, D., Baccou, J., Chevalier, C., Perales, F. (2016). Design of Computer Experiments Using Competing Distances Between Set-Valued Inputs. In: Kunert, J., Müller, C., Atkinson, A. (eds) mODa 11 - Advances in Model-Oriented Design and Analysis. Contributions to Statistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31266-8_15

Download citation