Advertisement

Multiple Survival Outcomes and Competing Risks

  • Dirk F. Moore
Chapter
Part of the Use R! book series (USE R)

Abstract

Until now the type of survival data we have considered has, as an endpoint, a single cause of death, and the survival times of each case have been assumed to be independent. Methods for analyzing such survival data will not be sufficient if cases are not independent or if the event is something that can occur repeatedly. An example of the first type would be clustered data. For instance, one might be interested in survival times of individuals that are in the same family or in the same unit, such as a town or school. In this case, genetic or environmental factors mean that survival times within a cluster are more similar to each other than to those from other clusters, so that the independence assumption no longer holds. In the second case, if the event of interest is, for example, the occurrence of a seizure, the event may repeat indefinitely. Then we would have multiple times per person. Special methods are needed to handle these types of data structures, which we shall discuss in Sect. 9.1. A different situation arises when only the first of several outcomes is observable, a topic we will take up in Sect. 9.2.

Keywords

Prostate Cancer Hazard Function BRCA Mutation Carrier Frailty Model Cumulative Incidence Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 4.
    Andersen, P.K., Geskus, R.B., de Witte, T., Putter, H.: Competing risks in epidemiology: possibilities and pitfalls. Int. J. Epidemiol. 41(3), 861–870 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 8.
    Chatterjee, N., Wacholder, S.: A marginal likelihood approach for estimating penetrance from kin-cohort designs. Biometrics 57(1), 245–252 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 14.
    de Wreede, L.C., Fiocco, M., Putter, H., et al.: mstate: an R package for the analysis of competing risks and multi-state models. J. Stat. Softw. 38(7), 1–30 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 26.
    Gray, R.J.: Flexible methods for analyzing survival data using splines, with applications to breast cancer prognosis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87(420), 942–951 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 32.
    Hosmer, D.W., Jr., Lemeshow, S., May, S.: Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 33.
    Huster, W.J., Brookmeyer, R., Self, S.G.: Modelling paired survival data with covariates. Biometrics 45, 145–156 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 36.
    Klein, J.P., Moeschberger, M.L.: Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 41.
    Lee, E.W., Wei, L.J., Amato, D.A., Leurgans, S.: Cox-type regression analysis for large numbers of small groups of correlated failure time observations. In: Survival Analysis: State of the Art, edited by J.P. Klein and P. Goel pp. 237–247. Springer, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  9. 44.
    Lin, D.Y.: Cox regression analysis of multivariate failure time data: the marginal approach. Stat. Med. 13(21), 2233–2247 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 45.
    Lin, D.Y., Wei, L.J.: The robust inference for the cox proportional hazards model. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 84(408), 1074–1078 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 49.
    Moore, D.F., Chatterjee, N., Pee, D., Gail, M.H.: Pseudo-likelihood estimates of the cumulative risk of an autosomal dominant disease from a kin-cohort study. Genet. Epidemiol. 20(2), 210–227 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 56.
    Putter, H., Fiocco, M., Geskus, R.B.: Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models. Stat. Med. 26, 2389–2430 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 57.
    Ross, E.A., Moore, D.: Modeling clustered, discrete, or grouped time survival data with covariates. Biometrics 55(3), 813–819 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 64.
    Struewing, J.P., Hartge, P., Wacholder, S., Baker, S.M., Berlin, M., McAdams, M., Timmerman, M.M., Brody, L.C., Tucker, M.A.: The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. N. Engl. J. Med. 336(20), 1401–1408 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 66.
    Therneau, P.M., Grambsch, T.M., Shane Pankratz, V.: Penalized survival models and frailty. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 12(1), 156–175 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 68.
    Therneau, T.M., Grambsch, P.M.: Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. Springer, New York (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 76.
    Wei, L.J., Lin, D.Y., Weissfeld, L.: Regression analysis of multivariate incomplete failure time data by modeling marginal distributions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 84(408), 1065–1073 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk F. Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiostatisticsRutgers School of Public HealthPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations