Protoepistemology of Mechanical Engineering in Cassiodorus’ Variae or Mission Impossible at Theoderic’s Court

Conference paper
Part of the History of Mechanism and Machine Science book series (HMMS, volume 32)

Abstract

Starting from the early 6th century CE, the Roman patrician Cassiodorus writes a conspicuous corpus of letters, entitled Variae, on behalf of his sovereign, the Ostrogoth Theoderic, and of his successors. These official letters, intended to show the king’s positive attitude towards other members of the court or to foster political relationships with foreign monarchs, offer the well-educated author the opportunity to address high-profile cultural issues. In one letter of the collection, he sings the praises of mechanical engineering, described as one of the most inspiring and powerful arts, competing none less than with nature.

Keywords

Mechanics Engineering Cassiodorus Theoderic Archimedes Letters Ostrogoth Liberal arts Mechanical arts Boëthius Clock Machine 

References

  1. 1.
    Ward-Perkins, B.: The Fall of Rome and the End of Civilization. Oxford University Press (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wozniak, F.E.: East Rome, Ravenna and Western Illyricum: 454–536 A.D. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 30, 351–382 (1981)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vitiello, M.: Il principe, il filosofo, il guerriero: lineamenti di pensiero politico nell’Italia Ostrogota, Franz Steiner Verlag (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sirago, V.A.: Gli Ostrogoti in Gallia secondo le Variae di Cassiodoro. Revue des Études Anciennes 89, 63–77 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Punzi, G.A.: L’Italia del VI secolo nelle Variae di Cassiodoro (Series: Piccola biblioteca di cultura). Vecchioni (1927)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mommsen, T. (ed.): Cassiodori Senatoris Variae (Series: Monumenta Germaniae Historica). Weidmann (1894)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aricò, G.: Cassiodoro e la cultura Latina. In: Atti della Settimana di Studi su Flavio Magno Aurelio Cassiodoro (Cosenza-Squillace 19–24 settembre 1983), pp. 154–178 (1986)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O’Donnell, J.J.: Cassiodorus. University of California Press (1979)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saitta, B.: I Burgundi: (413–534). Muglia (1977)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pizzani, U.: Boezio consulente tecnico al servizio dei re barbarici. Romanobarbarica: contributi allo studio dei rapporti culturali tra mondo romano e mondo barbarico 3, 189–242 (1978)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moorhead, J.: Boëthius and Romans in Ostrogothic Service. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 27, 1–21 (1978)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gros, P. (ed.): Vitruvio. De Architectura. Einaudi (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schmidt, W. (ed.): Heronis Alexandrini Opera Quae Supersunt Omnia, vol. 1, Pneumatica et automata. Teubner (1899)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carra de Vaux, B.: Le livre des appareils pneumatiques et des machines hydrauliques de Philon de Byzance d’après les versions arabes d’Oxford et de Constantinople. Académie des inscriptions et des belles lettres: notices et extraits des mss. de la Bibliothèque Nationale 38, 27–235 (1903)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McCluskey, S.: Boëthius’ astronomy and cosmology. In: A Companion to Boëthius in the Middle Ages, pp. 47–74. Brill (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gillett, A.: The purpose of Cassiodorus’ Variae. In: After Rome’s Fall: Narrators and Sources of Early Medieval History, pp. 37–50. University of Toronto press (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università Degli Studi Di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations