Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Energy ((LNEN,volume 55))

  • 354 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter provides an introduction to the book, by outlining the opportunities and challenges of bioenergy use, and discussing the role of economic policy advice in generating recommendations for a complex allocative and regulative problem. While the expansion of modern energetic biomass use can play an important role in transitioning to a low carbon energy system, it also entails sustainability risks and increases competition between various alternative uses for land and biomass resources. Indeed, German and European bioenergy policies have attracted fierce criticism with regard to efficiency and sustainability concerns. Economic policy advice can make a valuable contribution towards assessing these criticisms, and developing recommendations for a more rational policy design. However, theory-based, economic contributions to the debate have been primarily based on neoclassical economics, employing several idealised assumptions which prove problematic when confronted with the numerous sources of market and government failures which are relevant in the bioenergy context. This motivates the book’s research objectives: to gain additional economic insights into the governance of complex environmental policy problems, and to use these insights to develop economic recommendations for the case of German bioenergy policy which are closer to political realities than those based on the neoclassical construction of the problem. The German case study offers important lessons, since Germany was among the early movers in supporting the expansion of biomass use in all three energy sectors, which amplifies resource competition and increases coordination requirements between sectoral policy measures. Following the introduction of research objectives and methodology, the chapter outlines the structure of the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott M (2001) Is the security of electricity supply a public good? Electr J 14(7):31–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams P, Bows A, Gilbert P, Hammond J, Howard D, Lee R et al (2013) Understanding greenhouse gas balances of bioenergy systems. Supergen Bioenergy Hub, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammermann K, Mengel A (2011) Energetischer Biomasseanbau im Kontext von Naturschutz, Biodiversität, Kulturlandschaftsentwicklung. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 2011(5/6):323–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1984) The economics of agency. Center for Research on Organizational Efficiency, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (2008) The economic implications of learning by doing. In: Link AN (ed) The economic theory of invention and innovation. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 157–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur BW (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ J 99(394):116–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur BW (1994) Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ, Oates WE (1971) The use of standards and prices for protection of the environment. Swed J Econ 73(1):42–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS (1983) A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Q J Econ 98(3):371–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennear L, Stavins R (2007) Second-best theory and the use of multiple policy instruments. Environ Resour Econ 37(1):111–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout F (2002) Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment. Glob Environ Chang 12(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berndes G, Neil B, Cowie A (2010) Bioenergy, land use change and climate change mitigation. IEA Bioenergy, Rotorua

    Google Scholar 

  • Beurskens LWM, Hekkenberg M (2011) Renewable energy projections as published in the National Renewable Energy Action Plans of the European member states: covering all 27 EU Member States. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN), European Environment Agency (EEA), Petten, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • BMELV (2007) Memorandum Bioenergie und Biokraftstoffe. Bundesregierung fordert Verwirklichung ehrgeiziger Ziele auf EU-Ebene. Vorgelegt Juni 2004. Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV), Berlin. https://web.archive.org/web/20071009235403/http://www.bmelv.de/cln_045/nn_1021300/DE/081-NachwachsendeRohstoffe/MemorandumBioenergieBiokraftstoffe.html__nnn=true. Accessed 26 May 2015

  • BMELV (2013) Nationale Politikstrategie Bioökonomie. Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • BMU (2013) Renewable energy sources in figures. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), Berlin. https://web.archive.org/web/20140322172146/http://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/en/topics/data-service/renewable-energy-in-figures/. Accessed 20 Jan 2014

  • BMU, BMELV (2009) National biomass action plan for Germany. Biomass and sustainable energy supply. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • BMWi (2014) Eckpunkte für die Reform des EEG. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • BMWi, BMU (2010) Energiekonzept für eine umweltschonende, zuverlässige und bezahlbare Energieversorgung. Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (BMWi), Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitschopf B, Klobasa M, Sensfuß F, Steinbach J, Ragwitz M, Lehr U et al (2011) Einzel- und gesamtwirtschaftliche Analyse von Kosten- und Nutzenwirkungen des Ausbaus Erneuerbarer Energien im deutschen Strom- und Wärmemarkt. Update der quantifizierten Kosten- und Nutzenwirkungen für 2010. Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung (ISI), Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftliche Strukturforschung mbH (GWS), Institut für ZukunftsEnergieSysteme (IZES), Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Karlsruhe, Osnabrück, Saarbrücken, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringezu S, Schütz H, Arnold K, Bienge K (2008) Nutzungskonkurrenzen bei Biomasse: Auswirkungen der verstärkten Nutzung von Biomasse im Energiebereich auf die stoffliche Nutzung in der Biomasse verarbeitenden Industrie und deren Wettbewerbsfähigkeit durch staatliche induzierte Förderprogramme. Endbericht. Wuppertal Institut für Klima Umwelt Energie, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (RWI), Wuppertal, Essen

    Google Scholar 

  • Broch A, Hoekman SK, Unnasch S (2013) A review of variability in indirect land use change assessment and modeling in biofuel policy. Environ Sci Pol 29:147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau E, Garrouste P, Raynaud E (2011) Institutional changes: alternative theories and consequences for institutional design. J Econ Behav Organ 79(1–2):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carriquiry MA, Du X, Timilsina GR (2011) Second generation biofuels: economics and policies. Energy Policy 39(7):4222–4234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini F, Strømman AH (2011) Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresour Technol 102(2):437–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chum H, Faaij A, Moreira J, Berndes G, Dhamija P, Dong H et al (2011) Bioenergy. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Matschoss P, Kadner S et al (eds) IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 209–332

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • COM (2005) Biomass action plan. COM(2005) 628 final. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • COM (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Off J Eur Union L 140(5.6.2009):16–62

    Google Scholar 

  • COM (2010) Report from the Commission on indirect land-use change related to biofuels and bioliquids. COM (2010) 811 final. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • COM (2012a) Innovating for sustainable growth. A bioeconomy for Europe. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • COM (2012b) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. COM (2012) 595 final. European Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Cornwell L (1992) The 4P approach to dealing with scientific uncertainty. Environment 34(9):12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Daly HE, Bartholomew JA (1991) Goals, agenda, and policy recommendations for ecological economics. In: Costanza R (ed) Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE (1992) Allocation, distribution, and scale: towards an economics that is efficient, just, and sustainable. Ecol Econ 6(3):185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delzeit R, Britz W, Kreins P (2012) An economic assessment of biogas production and land use under the German Renewable Energy Source Act 2012. Kiel Working Paper No. 1767. Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW), Kiel

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz H (1969) Information and efficiency: another viewpoint. J Law Econ 12(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DG Energy (2010) The impact of land use change on greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels and bioliquids: literature review. Directorate-General for Energy, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Lucia L, Ahlgren S, Ericsson K (2012) The dilemma of indirect land-use changes in EU biofuel policy—an empirical study of policy-making in the context of scientific uncertainty. Environ Sci Pol 16:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit AK (1996) The making of economic policy: a transaction-cost politics perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • ECN (2011) NREAP database: the data from the National Renewable Energy Action Plans. Spreadsheet. Renewable energy projections as published in the National Renewable Energy Action Plans of the European member states. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN), European Environment Agency (EEA), Petten, Copenhagen. https://www.ecn.nl/nreap/data/. Accessed 30 May 2014

  • Edwards R, Mulligan D, Marelli L (2010) Indirect land use change from increased biofuels demand: comparison of models and results for marginal biofuels production from different feedstocks. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert H, Greaker M (2013). Promoting second generation biofuels: does the first generation pave the road? RFF Discussion Paper EfD 13–18. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlei M, Leschke M, Sauerland D (1999) Neue Institutionenökonomik. Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Eucken W (1952/1990) Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik, 7th edn. J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2015) Position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 28 April 2015 with a view to the adoption of Directive (EU) 2015/… of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Non-finalised text. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2015-0100+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN#BKMD-6. Accessed 15 May 2015

  • FAO (2008) The state of food and agriculture. Biofuels: prospects, risks and opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319(5867):1235–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Government of Germany (2005) Gemeinsam für Deutschland. Mit Mut und Menschlichkeit. Koalitionsvertrag von CDU, CSU und SPD, 11 Nov 2005. Federal Government of Germany, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Government of Germany (2010) National Renewable Energy Action Plan in accordance with Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Federal Government of Germany, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Government of Germany (2013) Deutschlands Zukunft gestalten. Koalitionsvertrag zwischen CDU, CSU und SPD, 18. Legislaturperiode. Federal Government of Germany, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Finon D, Perez Y (2007) The social efficiency of instruments of promotion of renewable energies: a transaction-cost perspective. Ecol Econ 62(1):77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FNR (2012) Bioenergy in Germany: facts and figures January 2012. Solid fuels, biofuels, biogas. Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e.V. (FNR), Gülzow

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch M (2011) Marktversagen und Wirtschaftspolitik. Mikroökonomische Grundlagen staatlichen Handelns, 8th edn. Verlag Franz Vahlen, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Frondel M, Peters J (2007) Biodiesel: a new Oildorado? Energy Policy 35(3):1675–1684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frondel M, Schmidt CM (2006) Emissionshandel und Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz: Eine notwendige Koexistenz? RWI: Positionen 10/2006. Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (RWI), Essen

    Google Scholar 

  • Frondel M, Ritter N, Schmidt CM, Vance C (2010) Economic impacts from the promotion of renewable energy technologies: the German experience. Energy Policy 38(8):4048–4056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1991) A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues. In: Costanza R (ed) Ecological Economics: the science and management of sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 137–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher E (2008) The Gallagher Review of the indirect effects of biofuels production. The Renewable Fuels Agency, St Leonards-on-Sea

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawel E (2009) Grundzüge der mikroökonomischen Theorie, 1st edn. Eul, Lohmar

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawel E, Ludwig G (2011) The iLUC dilemma: how to deal with indirect land use changes when governing energy crops? Land Use Policy 28(4):846–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawel E, Strunz S, Lehmann P (2014) A public choice view on the climate and energy policy mix in the EU—how do emissions trading scheme and support for renewable energies interact? Energy Policy 64:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GBEP (2007) A review of the current state of bioenergy development in G8 + 5 countries. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • German L, Schoneveld G (2012) A review of social sustainability considerations among EU-approved voluntary schemes for biofuels, with implications for rural livelihoods. Energy Policy 51:765–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulder LH, Parry IWH (2008) Instrument choice in environmental policy. Rev Environ Econ Policy 2(2):152–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross R (2004) Technologies and innovation for system change in the UK: status, prospects and system requirements of some leading renewable energy options. Energy Policy 32:1905–1919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberer AF (1996) Umweltbezogene Informationsasymmetrien und transparenzschaffende Institutionen. Metropolis, Marburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberl H, Sprinz D, Bonazountas M, Cocco P, Desaubies Y, Henze M et al (2012) Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy. Energy Policy 45:18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35(4):519–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1967/2003) Rechtsordnung und Handelnsordnung. In Streit ME (ed) Rechtsordnung und Handelsordnung. Aufsätze zur Ordnungsökonomik. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Henke JM, Klepper G (2006) Biokraftstoffe: Königsweg für Klimaschutz, profitable Landwirtschaft und sichere Energieversorgung? Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge 427. Institut für Weltwirtschaft Kiel (IfW), Kiel

    Google Scholar 

  • Henke JM, Klepper G, Schmitz N (2003) Tax exemption for biofuels in Germany: is bio-ethanol really an option for climate policy? Kiel Working Paper No. 1184. Institut für Weltwirtschaft Kiel (IfW), Kiel

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld J, Weiß J, Preidl M, Korbun T (2008) Klimawirkungen der Landwirtschaft in Deutschland. Diskussionspapier des IÖW 66/06, Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung (IÖW), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Isermeyer F, Zimmer Y (2006) Thesen zur Bioenergie-Politik in Deutschland. Arbeitsberichte des Bereichs Agrarökonomie 02/2006. Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft (FAL), Institut für Betriebswirtschaft, Braunschweig

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2005) A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy. Ecol Econ 54(2–3):164–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen JC, Bakker SJA (2006) Social cost-benefit analysis of climate change mitigation options in a European context. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN), Petten

    Google Scholar 

  • Junginger M, van Dam J, Zarrilli S, Ali Mohamed F, Marchal D, Faaij A (2011) Opportunities and barriers for international bioenergy trade. Energy Policy 39(4):2028–2042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kampman B, Fritsche U, Molenaar JW, Slingerland S, Bergsma G, Henneberg K et al (2010) BUBE: better use of biomass for energy. Background report to the position paper of IEA RETD and IEA Bioenergy, CE Delft, Öko-Institut, Delft, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiwit D, Voigt S (1995) Überlegungen zum institutionellen Wandel unter Berücksichtigung des Verhältnisses interner und externer Institutionen. ORDO Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 46:117–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper G (2010) Integration der Bioenergie in ein nachhaltiges Energiekonzept: Schlussfolgerungen aus dem NaRoLaProjekt. In: Presentation held at Abschlussworkshop des NaRoLa-Projekts: Nachwachsende Rohstoffe und Landnutzung: Integration der Bioenergie in ein nachhaltiges Energiekonzept, Berlin, 11 Mar 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopmann A, Kretschmer B, Lange M (2009) Effiziente Nutzung von Biomasse durch einen globalen Kohlenstoffpreis. Empfehlungen für eine koordinierte Bioenergiepolitik. Kiel Policy Brief Nr. 14. Institut für Weltwirtschaft Kiel (IfW), Kiel

    Google Scholar 

  • Krewitt W, Schlomann B (2006) Externe Kosten der Stromerzeugung aus erneuerbaren Energien im Vergleich zur Stromerzeugung aus fossilen Energieträgern. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Fraunhofer Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung (ISI), Stuttgart, Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutilla K, Krause R (2011) Transaction costs and environmental policy: an assessment framework and literature review. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 4(3-4):261–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krysiak FC (2009) Sustainability and its relation to efficiency under uncertainty. Economic Theory 41(2):297–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamers P, Hamelinck C, Junginger M, Faaij A (2011) International bioenergy trade—a review of past developments in the liquid biofuel market. Renew Sust Energy Rev 15(6):2655–2676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamers P, Junginger M, Hamelinck C, Faaij A (2012) Developments in international solid biofuel trade—an analysis of volumes, policies, and market factors. Renew Sust Energy Rev 16(5):3176–3199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange M (2011) The GHG balance of biofuels taking into account land use change. Energy Policy 39(5):2373–2385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langniß O, Diekmann J, Lehr U, Heer K, Klink J, Kratzat M (2007) Die Förderung Erneuerbarer Energien als Regulierungsaufgabe. Zentrum für Sonnenenergie- und Wasserstoff-Forschung Baden-Württemberg (ZSW), Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Stuttgart, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann P (2010) Using a policy mix to combat climate change—an economic evaluation of policies in the German electricity sector. PhD Dissertation 04/2010, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann P (2012) Justifying a policy mix for pollution control: a review of economic literature. J Econ Surv 26(1):71–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann P (2013) Supplementing an emissions tax by a feed-in tariff for renewable electricity to address learning spillovers. Energy Policy 61:635–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann P, Gawel E (2013) Why should support schemes for renewable electricity complement the EU emissions trading scheme? Energy Policy 52:597–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann P, Creutzig F, Ehlers M-H, Friedrichsen N, Heuson C, Hirth L et al (2012) Carbon lock-out: advancing renewable energy policy in Europe. Energies 5(2):323–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leipold H (1996) Zur Pfadabhängigkeit der institutionellen Entwicklung. Erklärungsansätze des Wandels von Ordnungen. In: Cassel D (ed) Enstehung und Wettbewerb von Systemen. Duncker und Humblot, Berlin, pp 93–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemoine DM, Plevin RJ, Cohn AS, Jones AD, Brandt AR, Vergara SE et al (2010) The climate impacts of bioenergy systems depend on market and regulatory policy contexts. Environ Sci Technol 44(19):7347–7350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom CE (1959) The science of “muddling through”. Public Adm Rev 19(2):79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom CE (1979) Still muddling, not yet through. Public Adm Rev 39(6):517–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey RG, Lancaster K (1956) The general theory of second best. Rev Econ Stud 24(1):11–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Londo M, Deurwaarder E (2007) Developments in EU biofuels policy related to sustainability issues: overview and outlook. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 1(4):292–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckenbach H (2000) Theoretische Grundlagen der Wirtschaftspolitik, 2nd edn. Vahlen, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield E (1994) Microeconomics. Theory/applications, 8th edn. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann L (2013) Transaction costs and environmental policy design. Ecol Econ 88:253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick RE, Tollison RD (1981) Politicians, legislation and the economy: an inquiry into the interest-group theory of government. Martinus-Nijhoff, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Menanteau P, Finon D, Lamy ML (2003) Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy. Energy Policy 31(8):799–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake S, Renouf M, Peterson A, McAlpine C, Smith C (2012) Land-use and environmental pressures resulting from current and future bioenergy crop expansion: a review. J Rural Stud 28(4):650–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller DC (1989) Public choice II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann K, Oehmichen K, Zeymer M, Müller-Langer F, Scheftelowitz M, Adler P et al (2014) DBFZ Report Nr. 11: Monitoring Biokraftstoffsektor. Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DBFZ), Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhoff K (2005) Large-scale deployment of renewables for electricity generation. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 21(1):88–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell RG (2010) The role of markets and policies in delivering innovation for climate change mitigation. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 26(2):253–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitsch J, Krewitt W, Nast M, Viebahn P, Gärtner S, Pehnt M et al (2004) Ökologisch optimierter Ausbau der Nutzung erneuerbarer Energien in Deutschland. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung (ifeu), Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt und Energie, Stuttgart, Heidelberg, Wuppertal

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1995) Five propositions about institutional change. In: Knight J, Sened I (eds) Explaining social institutions. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp 15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Noth M (1994) Regulierung bei asymmetrischer Informationsverteilung. Gabler Verlag, Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2011) Biofuels: ethical issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll GP, Rizzo MJ (1996) The economics of time and ignorance. Reissued. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009) The bioeconomy to 2030. Designing a policy agenda. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson M (1965) The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppermann R, Matzdorf B, Luick R, Gelhausen J, Reutter M, Stein S (2012) Common Agricultural Policy from 2014—perspectives for more biodiversity and environmental benefits of farming? Institute for Agro-ecology and Biodiversity (IFAB), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), University of Applied Forest Sciences Rottenburg (HFR), German Federal Nature Conservation Agency (BfN), Mannheim, Müncheberg, Rottenburg, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Orchard L, Stretton H (1997) Critical survey: public choice. Camb J Econ 21:409–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen AD (2006) Renewable energy: externality costs as market barriers. Energy Policy 34(5):632–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla E (2002) Intergenerational equity and sustainability. Ecol Econ 41(1):69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rader NA, Norgaard RB (1996) Efficiency and sustainability in restructured electricity markets: the renewables portfolio standard. Electr J 9(6):37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment—part 1: goal and scope and inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(4):290–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REN21 (2014) Renewables 2014 global status report. REN21 Secretariat, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • RES LEGAL (2015) Legal sources on renewable energy: renewable energy policy database. An initiative of the European Commission. Eclareon, Berlin. http://www.res-legal.eu/. Accessed 14 May 2015.

  • Richter R, Furubotn EG (2003) Neue Institutionenökonomik. Eine Einführung und kritische Würdigung, 3rd edn. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring I, Schröter-Schlaack C (2011) Justifying and assessing policy mixes for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Istanbul, 14–17 Jun 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi A (ed) (2012) Good environmental practices in bioenergy feedstock production. Making bioenergy work for climate and food security. Bioenergy and Food Security Criteria and Indicators Project, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlamann I, Wieler B, Fleckenstein M, Walther-Thoß J, Haase N, Mathe L (2013) Searching for sustainability. Comparative analysis of certification schemes for biomass used for the production of biofuels. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Deutschland, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert R, Blasch J (2010) Sustainability standards for bioenergy: a means to reduce climate change risks? Energy Policy 38(6):2797–2805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searchinger T (2009) Evaluating biofuels—the consequences of using land to make fuel. Brussels Forum Paper Series. The German Marshall Fund of the United States, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijm J, Lehmann P, Gawel E, Chewpreecha U, Pollit H, Strunz S (2014) EU climate and energy policy in 2030: how many targets and instruments are necessary? UFZ Discussion Papers 3/2014. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims REH, Mabee W, Saddler JN, Taylor M (2010) An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. Bioresour Technol 101(6):1570–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn H-W (2008) Das grüne Paradoxon—Plädoyer für eine illusionsfreie Klimapolitik. Econ, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • SRU (2007) Climate change mitigation by biomass. Special report. German Advisory Council on the Environment (SRU), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehfest E, Ros J, Bouwman L (2010) Indirect effects of biofuels: intensification of agricultural production. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), Bilthoven

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterner M, Fritsche U (2011) Greenhouse gas balances and mitigation costs of 70 modern Germany-focused and 4 traditional biomass pathways including land-use change effects. Biomass Bioenergy 35(12):4797–4814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornley P, Cooper D (2008) The effectiveness of policy instruments in promoting bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 32(10):903–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrän D, Leible L, Simon S, Pütz S, Kälber S, Geiss C et al (2010a) Bioenergie und nachhaltige Landnutzung. Technikfolgenabschätzung—Theorie und Praxis 19(3):65–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrän D, Seidenberger T, Zeddies J, Offermann R (2010b) Global biomass potentials—resources, drivers and scenario results. Energy Sustain Devt 14(3):200–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrän D, Edel M, Pfeifer J, Ponitka J, Rode M, Knispel S (2011a) DBFZ Report Nr. 4: Identifizierung strategischer Hemmnisse und Entwicklung von Lösungsansätzen zur Reduzierung der Nutzungskonkurrenzen beim weiteren Ausbau der Biomassenutzung. Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DBFZ), Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrän D, Scholwin F, Witt J, Krautz A, Bienert K, Hennig C et al (2011b) Vorbereitung und Begleitung der Erstellung des Erfahrungsberichtes 2011 gemäß § 65 EEG im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. Vorhaben IIa Endbericht. Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DBFZ), Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen J (1952) On the theory of economic policy. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G (2008) Public choice. In: Durlauf SN (ed) The new Palgrave dictionary of economics, vol 6, 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 722–727

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2014) Decision -/CP.20. Lima call for climate action. Advance unedited version. Lima Climate Change Conference—Dec 2014, summary of key outcomes. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Bonn. http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/lima_dec_2014/application/pdf/auv_cop20_lima_call_for_climate_action.pdf. Accessed 25 Jun 2015

  • Unruh GC (2000) Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28(12):817–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unruh GC (2002) Escaping carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 30(4):317–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upham P, Riesch H, Tomei J, Thornley P (2011) The sustainability of forestry biomass supply for EU bioenergy: a post-normal approach to environmental risk and uncertainty. Environ Sci Pol 14(5):510–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Stappen F, Brose I, Schenkel Y (2011) Direct and indirect land use changes issues in European sustainability initiatives: state-of-the-art, open issues and future developments. Biomass Bioenergy 35(12):4824–4834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WBA (2007) Nutzung von Biomasse zur Energiegewinnung—Empfehlungen an die Politik. Wissenschaftlicher Beirat Agrarpolitik beim Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz (WBA), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU (2008) Future bioenergy and sustainable land use. German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner G (1996) Zur Pathologie wirtschaftspolitischer Lenkung: Eine neue Betrachtungsweise. In: Priddat BP, Wegner G (eds) Zwischen Evolution und Institution: Neue Ansätze in der ökonomischen Theorie. Metropolis, Marburg, pp 367–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimann J (2008) Die Klimapolitik-Katastrophe. Deutschland im Dunkel der Energiesparlampe. Metropolis, Marburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman ML (1974) Prices vs. quantities. Rev Econ Stud 41(4):477–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesenthal T, Mourelatou A, Petersen J.-E, Taylor P (2006) How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment? EEA Report. No. 7/2006. European Environment Agency (EEA), Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1975) Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications: a study in the economics of internal organization. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (2000) The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. J Econ Lit 38:595–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (2005) Transaction cost economics. In: Ménard C, Shirley MM (eds) Handbook of new institutional economics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 41–65

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Winkel T, Ragwitz M, Resch G, Konstantinaviciute I, Rathmann M, Panzer C et al (2011) Renewable energy policy country profiles. 2011 version. Based on policy information available in November 2011. Prepared within the Intelligent Energy Europe project RE-Shaping. Ecofys, Fraunhofer Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung (ISI), Energy Economics Group, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Utrecht, Karlsruhe, Vienna, Kaunas

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt J, Thrän D, Rensberg N, Weiser C, Hennig C, Reinhold G et al (2012) Monitoring zur Wirkung des Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz (EEG) auf die Entwicklung der Stromerzeugung aus Biomasse. Endbericht zur EEG-Periode 2009 bis 2011. Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DBFZ), Leipzig. https://www.dbfz.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Berichte_Projektdatenbank/3330002_Stromerzeugung_aus_Biomasse_Endbericht_Ver%C3%B6ffentlichung_FINAL_FASSUNG.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2016

  • Woodward RT, Bishop RC (1995) Efficiency, sustainability and global warming. Ecol Econ 14(2):101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunder S, Kaphengst T, Timeus K, Berzins K (2012) Impact of EU bioenergy policy on developing countries. Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union, Policy Department, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Young RA (2001) Uncertainty and the environment. Implications for decision making and environmental policy. Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Purkus, A. (2016). Introduction. In: Concepts and Instruments for a Rational Bioenergy Policy. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 55. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31135-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31135-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31134-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31135-7

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics