Abstract
The chapter provides an introduction to the book, by outlining the opportunities and challenges of bioenergy use, and discussing the role of economic policy advice in generating recommendations for a complex allocative and regulative problem. While the expansion of modern energetic biomass use can play an important role in transitioning to a low carbon energy system, it also entails sustainability risks and increases competition between various alternative uses for land and biomass resources. Indeed, German and European bioenergy policies have attracted fierce criticism with regard to efficiency and sustainability concerns. Economic policy advice can make a valuable contribution towards assessing these criticisms, and developing recommendations for a more rational policy design. However, theory-based, economic contributions to the debate have been primarily based on neoclassical economics, employing several idealised assumptions which prove problematic when confronted with the numerous sources of market and government failures which are relevant in the bioenergy context. This motivates the book’s research objectives: to gain additional economic insights into the governance of complex environmental policy problems, and to use these insights to develop economic recommendations for the case of German bioenergy policy which are closer to political realities than those based on the neoclassical construction of the problem. The German case study offers important lessons, since Germany was among the early movers in supporting the expansion of biomass use in all three energy sectors, which amplifies resource competition and increases coordination requirements between sectoral policy measures. Following the introduction of research objectives and methodology, the chapter outlines the structure of the book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbott M (2001) Is the security of electricity supply a public good? Electr J 14(7):31–33
Adams P, Bows A, Gilbert P, Hammond J, Howard D, Lee R et al (2013) Understanding greenhouse gas balances of bioenergy systems. Supergen Bioenergy Hub, Manchester
Ammermann K, Mengel A (2011) Energetischer Biomasseanbau im Kontext von Naturschutz, Biodiversität, Kulturlandschaftsentwicklung. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 2011(5/6):323–337
Arrow KJ (1984) The economics of agency. Center for Research on Organizational Efficiency, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Arrow KJ (2008) The economic implications of learning by doing. In: Link AN (ed) The economic theory of invention and innovation. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 157–175
Arthur BW (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ J 99(394):116–131
Arthur BW (1994) Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI
Baumol WJ, Oates WE (1971) The use of standards and prices for protection of the environment. Swed J Econ 73(1):42–54
Becker GS (1983) A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Q J Econ 98(3):371–400
Bennear L, Stavins R (2007) Second-best theory and the use of multiple policy instruments. Environ Resour Econ 37(1):111–129
Berkhout F (2002) Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment. Glob Environ Chang 12(1):1–4
Berndes G, Neil B, Cowie A (2010) Bioenergy, land use change and climate change mitigation. IEA Bioenergy, Rotorua
Beurskens LWM, Hekkenberg M (2011) Renewable energy projections as published in the National Renewable Energy Action Plans of the European member states: covering all 27 EU Member States. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN), European Environment Agency (EEA), Petten, Copenhagen
BMELV (2007) Memorandum Bioenergie und Biokraftstoffe. Bundesregierung fordert Verwirklichung ehrgeiziger Ziele auf EU-Ebene. Vorgelegt Juni 2004. Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV), Berlin. https://web.archive.org/web/20071009235403/http://www.bmelv.de/cln_045/nn_1021300/DE/081-NachwachsendeRohstoffe/MemorandumBioenergieBiokraftstoffe.html__nnn=true. Accessed 26 May 2015
BMELV (2013) Nationale Politikstrategie Bioökonomie. Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV), Berlin
BMU (2013) Renewable energy sources in figures. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), Berlin. https://web.archive.org/web/20140322172146/http://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/en/topics/data-service/renewable-energy-in-figures/. Accessed 20 Jan 2014
BMU, BMELV (2009) National biomass action plan for Germany. Biomass and sustainable energy supply. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV), Berlin
BMWi (2014) Eckpunkte für die Reform des EEG. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi), Berlin
BMWi, BMU (2010) Energiekonzept für eine umweltschonende, zuverlässige und bezahlbare Energieversorgung. Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (BMWi), Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), Berlin
Breitschopf B, Klobasa M, Sensfuß F, Steinbach J, Ragwitz M, Lehr U et al (2011) Einzel- und gesamtwirtschaftliche Analyse von Kosten- und Nutzenwirkungen des Ausbaus Erneuerbarer Energien im deutschen Strom- und Wärmemarkt. Update der quantifizierten Kosten- und Nutzenwirkungen für 2010. Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung (ISI), Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftliche Strukturforschung mbH (GWS), Institut für ZukunftsEnergieSysteme (IZES), Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Karlsruhe, Osnabrück, Saarbrücken, Berlin
Bringezu S, Schütz H, Arnold K, Bienge K (2008) Nutzungskonkurrenzen bei Biomasse: Auswirkungen der verstärkten Nutzung von Biomasse im Energiebereich auf die stoffliche Nutzung in der Biomasse verarbeitenden Industrie und deren Wettbewerbsfähigkeit durch staatliche induzierte Förderprogramme. Endbericht. Wuppertal Institut für Klima Umwelt Energie, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (RWI), Wuppertal, Essen
Broch A, Hoekman SK, Unnasch S (2013) A review of variability in indirect land use change assessment and modeling in biofuel policy. Environ Sci Pol 29:147–157
Brousseau E, Garrouste P, Raynaud E (2011) Institutional changes: alternative theories and consequences for institutional design. J Econ Behav Organ 79(1–2):3–19
Carriquiry MA, Du X, Timilsina GR (2011) Second generation biofuels: economics and policies. Energy Policy 39(7):4222–4234
Cherubini F, Strømman AH (2011) Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresour Technol 102(2):437–451
Chum H, Faaij A, Moreira J, Berndes G, Dhamija P, Dong H et al (2011) Bioenergy. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Matschoss P, Kadner S et al (eds) IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 209–332
COM (2005) Biomass action plan. COM(2005) 628 final. European Commission, Brussels
COM (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Off J Eur Union L 140(5.6.2009):16–62
COM (2010) Report from the Commission on indirect land-use change related to biofuels and bioliquids. COM (2010) 811 final. European Commission, Brussels
COM (2012a) Innovating for sustainable growth. A bioeconomy for Europe. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels
COM (2012b) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. COM (2012) 595 final. European Commission, Brussels.
Costanza R, Cornwell L (1992) The 4P approach to dealing with scientific uncertainty. Environment 34(9):12–20
Costanza R, Daly HE, Bartholomew JA (1991) Goals, agenda, and policy recommendations for ecological economics. In: Costanza R (ed) Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 1–20
Daly HE (1992) Allocation, distribution, and scale: towards an economics that is efficient, just, and sustainable. Ecol Econ 6(3):185–193
Delzeit R, Britz W, Kreins P (2012) An economic assessment of biogas production and land use under the German Renewable Energy Source Act 2012. Kiel Working Paper No. 1767. Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW), Kiel
Demsetz H (1969) Information and efficiency: another viewpoint. J Law Econ 12(1):1–22
DG Energy (2010) The impact of land use change on greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels and bioliquids: literature review. Directorate-General for Energy, Brussels
Di Lucia L, Ahlgren S, Ericsson K (2012) The dilemma of indirect land-use changes in EU biofuel policy—an empirical study of policy-making in the context of scientific uncertainty. Environ Sci Pol 16:9–19
Dixit AK (1996) The making of economic policy: a transaction-cost politics perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
ECN (2011) NREAP database: the data from the National Renewable Energy Action Plans. Spreadsheet. Renewable energy projections as published in the National Renewable Energy Action Plans of the European member states. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN), European Environment Agency (EEA), Petten, Copenhagen. https://www.ecn.nl/nreap/data/. Accessed 30 May 2014
Edwards R, Mulligan D, Marelli L (2010) Indirect land use change from increased biofuels demand: comparison of models and results for marginal biofuels production from different feedstocks. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. European Union, Luxembourg
Eggert H, Greaker M (2013). Promoting second generation biofuels: does the first generation pave the road? RFF Discussion Paper EfD 13–18. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
Erlei M, Leschke M, Sauerland D (1999) Neue Institutionenökonomik. Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag, Stuttgart
Eucken W (1952/1990) Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik, 7th edn. J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen
European Parliament (2015) Position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 28 April 2015 with a view to the adoption of Directive (EU) 2015/… of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Non-finalised text. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2015-0100+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN#BKMD-6. Accessed 15 May 2015
FAO (2008) The state of food and agriculture. Biofuels: prospects, risks and opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome
Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319(5867):1235–1238
Federal Government of Germany (2005) Gemeinsam für Deutschland. Mit Mut und Menschlichkeit. Koalitionsvertrag von CDU, CSU und SPD, 11 Nov 2005. Federal Government of Germany, Berlin
Federal Government of Germany (2010) National Renewable Energy Action Plan in accordance with Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Federal Government of Germany, Berlin
Federal Government of Germany (2013) Deutschlands Zukunft gestalten. Koalitionsvertrag zwischen CDU, CSU und SPD, 18. Legislaturperiode. Federal Government of Germany, Berlin
Finon D, Perez Y (2007) The social efficiency of instruments of promotion of renewable energies: a transaction-cost perspective. Ecol Econ 62(1):77–92
FNR (2012) Bioenergy in Germany: facts and figures January 2012. Solid fuels, biofuels, biogas. Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e.V. (FNR), Gülzow
Fritsch M (2011) Marktversagen und Wirtschaftspolitik. Mikroökonomische Grundlagen staatlichen Handelns, 8th edn. Verlag Franz Vahlen, Munich
Frondel M, Peters J (2007) Biodiesel: a new Oildorado? Energy Policy 35(3):1675–1684
Frondel M, Schmidt CM (2006) Emissionshandel und Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz: Eine notwendige Koexistenz? RWI: Positionen 10/2006. Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (RWI), Essen
Frondel M, Ritter N, Schmidt CM, Vance C (2010) Economic impacts from the promotion of renewable energy technologies: the German experience. Energy Policy 38(8):4048–4056
Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1991) A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues. In: Costanza R (ed) Ecological Economics: the science and management of sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 137–152
Gallagher E (2008) The Gallagher Review of the indirect effects of biofuels production. The Renewable Fuels Agency, St Leonards-on-Sea
Gawel E (2009) Grundzüge der mikroökonomischen Theorie, 1st edn. Eul, Lohmar
Gawel E, Ludwig G (2011) The iLUC dilemma: how to deal with indirect land use changes when governing energy crops? Land Use Policy 28(4):846–856
Gawel E, Strunz S, Lehmann P (2014) A public choice view on the climate and energy policy mix in the EU—how do emissions trading scheme and support for renewable energies interact? Energy Policy 64:175–182
GBEP (2007) A review of the current state of bioenergy development in G8 + 5 countries. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP), Rome
German L, Schoneveld G (2012) A review of social sustainability considerations among EU-approved voluntary schemes for biofuels, with implications for rural livelihoods. Energy Policy 51:765–778
Goulder LH, Parry IWH (2008) Instrument choice in environmental policy. Rev Environ Econ Policy 2(2):152–174
Gross R (2004) Technologies and innovation for system change in the UK: status, prospects and system requirements of some leading renewable energy options. Energy Policy 32:1905–1919
Haberer AF (1996) Umweltbezogene Informationsasymmetrien und transparenzschaffende Institutionen. Metropolis, Marburg
Haberl H, Sprinz D, Bonazountas M, Cocco P, Desaubies Y, Henze M et al (2012) Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy. Energy Policy 45:18–23
Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35(4):519–530
Hayek FA (1967/2003) Rechtsordnung und Handelnsordnung. In Streit ME (ed) Rechtsordnung und Handelsordnung. Aufsätze zur Ordnungsökonomik. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen
Henke JM, Klepper G (2006) Biokraftstoffe: Königsweg für Klimaschutz, profitable Landwirtschaft und sichere Energieversorgung? Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge 427. Institut für Weltwirtschaft Kiel (IfW), Kiel
Henke JM, Klepper G, Schmitz N (2003) Tax exemption for biofuels in Germany: is bio-ethanol really an option for climate policy? Kiel Working Paper No. 1184. Institut für Weltwirtschaft Kiel (IfW), Kiel
Hirschfeld J, Weiß J, Preidl M, Korbun T (2008) Klimawirkungen der Landwirtschaft in Deutschland. Diskussionspapier des IÖW 66/06, Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung (IÖW), Berlin
IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Isermeyer F, Zimmer Y (2006) Thesen zur Bioenergie-Politik in Deutschland. Arbeitsberichte des Bereichs Agrarökonomie 02/2006. Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft (FAL), Institut für Betriebswirtschaft, Braunschweig
Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2005) A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy. Ecol Econ 54(2–3):164–174
Jansen JC, Bakker SJA (2006) Social cost-benefit analysis of climate change mitigation options in a European context. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN), Petten
Junginger M, van Dam J, Zarrilli S, Ali Mohamed F, Marchal D, Faaij A (2011) Opportunities and barriers for international bioenergy trade. Energy Policy 39(4):2028–2042
Kampman B, Fritsche U, Molenaar JW, Slingerland S, Bergsma G, Henneberg K et al (2010) BUBE: better use of biomass for energy. Background report to the position paper of IEA RETD and IEA Bioenergy, CE Delft, Öko-Institut, Delft, Darmstadt
Kiwit D, Voigt S (1995) Überlegungen zum institutionellen Wandel unter Berücksichtigung des Verhältnisses interner und externer Institutionen. ORDO Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 46:117–148
Klepper G (2010) Integration der Bioenergie in ein nachhaltiges Energiekonzept: Schlussfolgerungen aus dem NaRoLaProjekt. In: Presentation held at Abschlussworkshop des NaRoLa-Projekts: Nachwachsende Rohstoffe und Landnutzung: Integration der Bioenergie in ein nachhaltiges Energiekonzept, Berlin, 11 Mar 2010
Kopmann A, Kretschmer B, Lange M (2009) Effiziente Nutzung von Biomasse durch einen globalen Kohlenstoffpreis. Empfehlungen für eine koordinierte Bioenergiepolitik. Kiel Policy Brief Nr. 14. Institut für Weltwirtschaft Kiel (IfW), Kiel
Krewitt W, Schlomann B (2006) Externe Kosten der Stromerzeugung aus erneuerbaren Energien im Vergleich zur Stromerzeugung aus fossilen Energieträgern. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Fraunhofer Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung (ISI), Stuttgart, Karlsruhe
Krutilla K, Krause R (2011) Transaction costs and environmental policy: an assessment framework and literature review. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 4(3-4):261–354
Krysiak FC (2009) Sustainability and its relation to efficiency under uncertainty. Economic Theory 41(2):297–315
Lamers P, Hamelinck C, Junginger M, Faaij A (2011) International bioenergy trade—a review of past developments in the liquid biofuel market. Renew Sust Energy Rev 15(6):2655–2676
Lamers P, Junginger M, Hamelinck C, Faaij A (2012) Developments in international solid biofuel trade—an analysis of volumes, policies, and market factors. Renew Sust Energy Rev 16(5):3176–3199
Lange M (2011) The GHG balance of biofuels taking into account land use change. Energy Policy 39(5):2373–2385
Langniß O, Diekmann J, Lehr U, Heer K, Klink J, Kratzat M (2007) Die Förderung Erneuerbarer Energien als Regulierungsaufgabe. Zentrum für Sonnenenergie- und Wasserstoff-Forschung Baden-Württemberg (ZSW), Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Stuttgart, Berlin
Lehmann P (2010) Using a policy mix to combat climate change—an economic evaluation of policies in the German electricity sector. PhD Dissertation 04/2010, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Leipzig
Lehmann P (2012) Justifying a policy mix for pollution control: a review of economic literature. J Econ Surv 26(1):71–97
Lehmann P (2013) Supplementing an emissions tax by a feed-in tariff for renewable electricity to address learning spillovers. Energy Policy 61:635–641
Lehmann P, Gawel E (2013) Why should support schemes for renewable electricity complement the EU emissions trading scheme? Energy Policy 52:597–607
Lehmann P, Creutzig F, Ehlers M-H, Friedrichsen N, Heuson C, Hirth L et al (2012) Carbon lock-out: advancing renewable energy policy in Europe. Energies 5(2):323–354
Leipold H (1996) Zur Pfadabhängigkeit der institutionellen Entwicklung. Erklärungsansätze des Wandels von Ordnungen. In: Cassel D (ed) Enstehung und Wettbewerb von Systemen. Duncker und Humblot, Berlin, pp 93–115
Lemoine DM, Plevin RJ, Cohn AS, Jones AD, Brandt AR, Vergara SE et al (2010) The climate impacts of bioenergy systems depend on market and regulatory policy contexts. Environ Sci Technol 44(19):7347–7350
Lindblom CE (1959) The science of “muddling through”. Public Adm Rev 19(2):79–88
Lindblom CE (1979) Still muddling, not yet through. Public Adm Rev 39(6):517–526
Lipsey RG, Lancaster K (1956) The general theory of second best. Rev Econ Stud 24(1):11–32
Londo M, Deurwaarder E (2007) Developments in EU biofuels policy related to sustainability issues: overview and outlook. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 1(4):292–302
Luckenbach H (2000) Theoretische Grundlagen der Wirtschaftspolitik, 2nd edn. Vahlen, Munich
Mansfield E (1994) Microeconomics. Theory/applications, 8th edn. Norton, New York
McCann L (2013) Transaction costs and environmental policy design. Ecol Econ 88:253–262
McCormick RE, Tollison RD (1981) Politicians, legislation and the economy: an inquiry into the interest-group theory of government. Martinus-Nijhoff, Boston
Menanteau P, Finon D, Lamy ML (2003) Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy. Energy Policy 31(8):799–812
Miyake S, Renouf M, Peterson A, McAlpine C, Smith C (2012) Land-use and environmental pressures resulting from current and future bioenergy crop expansion: a review. J Rural Stud 28(4):650–658
Mueller DC (1989) Public choice II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Naumann K, Oehmichen K, Zeymer M, Müller-Langer F, Scheftelowitz M, Adler P et al (2014) DBFZ Report Nr. 11: Monitoring Biokraftstoffsektor. Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DBFZ), Leipzig
Neuhoff K (2005) Large-scale deployment of renewables for electricity generation. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 21(1):88–110
Newell RG (2010) The role of markets and policies in delivering innovation for climate change mitigation. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 26(2):253–269
Nitsch J, Krewitt W, Nast M, Viebahn P, Gärtner S, Pehnt M et al (2004) Ökologisch optimierter Ausbau der Nutzung erneuerbarer Energien in Deutschland. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung (ifeu), Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt und Energie, Stuttgart, Heidelberg, Wuppertal
North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
North DC (1995) Five propositions about institutional change. In: Knight J, Sened I (eds) Explaining social institutions. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp 15–26
Noth M (1994) Regulierung bei asymmetrischer Informationsverteilung. Gabler Verlag, Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2011) Biofuels: ethical issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London
O’Driscoll GP, Rizzo MJ (1996) The economics of time and ignorance. Reissued. Routledge, London
OECD (2009) The bioeconomy to 2030. Designing a policy agenda. OECD Publishing, Paris
Olson M (1965) The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Oppermann R, Matzdorf B, Luick R, Gelhausen J, Reutter M, Stein S (2012) Common Agricultural Policy from 2014—perspectives for more biodiversity and environmental benefits of farming? Institute for Agro-ecology and Biodiversity (IFAB), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), University of Applied Forest Sciences Rottenburg (HFR), German Federal Nature Conservation Agency (BfN), Mannheim, Müncheberg, Rottenburg, Bonn
Orchard L, Stretton H (1997) Critical survey: public choice. Camb J Econ 21:409–430
Owen AD (2006) Renewable energy: externality costs as market barriers. Energy Policy 34(5):632–642
Padilla E (2002) Intergenerational equity and sustainability. Ecol Econ 41(1):69–83
Rader NA, Norgaard RB (1996) Efficiency and sustainability in restructured electricity markets: the renewables portfolio standard. Electr J 9(6):37–49
Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment—part 1: goal and scope and inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(4):290–300
REN21 (2014) Renewables 2014 global status report. REN21 Secretariat, Paris
RES LEGAL (2015) Legal sources on renewable energy: renewable energy policy database. An initiative of the European Commission. Eclareon, Berlin. http://www.res-legal.eu/. Accessed 14 May 2015.
Richter R, Furubotn EG (2003) Neue Institutionenökonomik. Eine Einführung und kritische Würdigung, 3rd edn. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen
Ring I, Schröter-Schlaack C (2011) Justifying and assessing policy mixes for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Istanbul, 14–17 Jun 2011
Rossi A (ed) (2012) Good environmental practices in bioenergy feedstock production. Making bioenergy work for climate and food security. Bioenergy and Food Security Criteria and Indicators Project, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome
Schlamann I, Wieler B, Fleckenstein M, Walther-Thoß J, Haase N, Mathe L (2013) Searching for sustainability. Comparative analysis of certification schemes for biomass used for the production of biofuels. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Deutschland, Berlin
Schubert R, Blasch J (2010) Sustainability standards for bioenergy: a means to reduce climate change risks? Energy Policy 38(6):2797–2805
Searchinger T (2009) Evaluating biofuels—the consequences of using land to make fuel. Brussels Forum Paper Series. The German Marshall Fund of the United States, Washington, DC
Sijm J, Lehmann P, Gawel E, Chewpreecha U, Pollit H, Strunz S (2014) EU climate and energy policy in 2030: how many targets and instruments are necessary? UFZ Discussion Papers 3/2014. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Leipzig
Sims REH, Mabee W, Saddler JN, Taylor M (2010) An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. Bioresour Technol 101(6):1570–1580
Sinn H-W (2008) Das grüne Paradoxon—Plädoyer für eine illusionsfreie Klimapolitik. Econ, Berlin
SRU (2007) Climate change mitigation by biomass. Special report. German Advisory Council on the Environment (SRU), Berlin
Stehfest E, Ros J, Bouwman L (2010) Indirect effects of biofuels: intensification of agricultural production. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), Bilthoven
Sterner M, Fritsche U (2011) Greenhouse gas balances and mitigation costs of 70 modern Germany-focused and 4 traditional biomass pathways including land-use change effects. Biomass Bioenergy 35(12):4797–4814
Thornley P, Cooper D (2008) The effectiveness of policy instruments in promoting bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 32(10):903–913
Thrän D, Leible L, Simon S, Pütz S, Kälber S, Geiss C et al (2010a) Bioenergie und nachhaltige Landnutzung. Technikfolgenabschätzung—Theorie und Praxis 19(3):65–74
Thrän D, Seidenberger T, Zeddies J, Offermann R (2010b) Global biomass potentials—resources, drivers and scenario results. Energy Sustain Devt 14(3):200–205
Thrän D, Edel M, Pfeifer J, Ponitka J, Rode M, Knispel S (2011a) DBFZ Report Nr. 4: Identifizierung strategischer Hemmnisse und Entwicklung von Lösungsansätzen zur Reduzierung der Nutzungskonkurrenzen beim weiteren Ausbau der Biomassenutzung. Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DBFZ), Leipzig
Thrän D, Scholwin F, Witt J, Krautz A, Bienert K, Hennig C et al (2011b) Vorbereitung und Begleitung der Erstellung des Erfahrungsberichtes 2011 gemäß § 65 EEG im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. Vorhaben IIa Endbericht. Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DBFZ), Leipzig
Tinbergen J (1952) On the theory of economic policy. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Tullock G (2008) Public choice. In: Durlauf SN (ed) The new Palgrave dictionary of economics, vol 6, 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 722–727
UNFCCC (2014) Decision -/CP.20. Lima call for climate action. Advance unedited version. Lima Climate Change Conference—Dec 2014, summary of key outcomes. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Bonn. http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/lima_dec_2014/application/pdf/auv_cop20_lima_call_for_climate_action.pdf. Accessed 25 Jun 2015
Unruh GC (2000) Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28(12):817–830
Unruh GC (2002) Escaping carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 30(4):317–325
Upham P, Riesch H, Tomei J, Thornley P (2011) The sustainability of forestry biomass supply for EU bioenergy: a post-normal approach to environmental risk and uncertainty. Environ Sci Pol 14(5):510–518
van Stappen F, Brose I, Schenkel Y (2011) Direct and indirect land use changes issues in European sustainability initiatives: state-of-the-art, open issues and future developments. Biomass Bioenergy 35(12):4824–4834
WBA (2007) Nutzung von Biomasse zur Energiegewinnung—Empfehlungen an die Politik. Wissenschaftlicher Beirat Agrarpolitik beim Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz (WBA), Berlin
WBGU (2008) Future bioenergy and sustainable land use. German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU), Berlin
Wegner G (1996) Zur Pathologie wirtschaftspolitischer Lenkung: Eine neue Betrachtungsweise. In: Priddat BP, Wegner G (eds) Zwischen Evolution und Institution: Neue Ansätze in der ökonomischen Theorie. Metropolis, Marburg, pp 367–401
Weimann J (2008) Die Klimapolitik-Katastrophe. Deutschland im Dunkel der Energiesparlampe. Metropolis, Marburg
Weitzman ML (1974) Prices vs. quantities. Rev Econ Stud 41(4):477–491
Wiesenthal T, Mourelatou A, Petersen J.-E, Taylor P (2006) How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment? EEA Report. No. 7/2006. European Environment Agency (EEA), Copenhagen
Williamson OE (1975) Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications: a study in the economics of internal organization. Free Press, New York
Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press, New York
Williamson OE (2000) The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. J Econ Lit 38:595–613
Williamson OE (2005) Transaction cost economics. In: Ménard C, Shirley MM (eds) Handbook of new institutional economics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 41–65
Winkel T, Ragwitz M, Resch G, Konstantinaviciute I, Rathmann M, Panzer C et al (2011) Renewable energy policy country profiles. 2011 version. Based on policy information available in November 2011. Prepared within the Intelligent Energy Europe project RE-Shaping. Ecofys, Fraunhofer Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung (ISI), Energy Economics Group, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Utrecht, Karlsruhe, Vienna, Kaunas
Witt J, Thrän D, Rensberg N, Weiser C, Hennig C, Reinhold G et al (2012) Monitoring zur Wirkung des Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz (EEG) auf die Entwicklung der Stromerzeugung aus Biomasse. Endbericht zur EEG-Periode 2009 bis 2011. Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DBFZ), Leipzig. https://www.dbfz.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Berichte_Projektdatenbank/3330002_Stromerzeugung_aus_Biomasse_Endbericht_Ver%C3%B6ffentlichung_FINAL_FASSUNG.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2016
Woodward RT, Bishop RC (1995) Efficiency, sustainability and global warming. Ecol Econ 14(2):101–111
Wunder S, Kaphengst T, Timeus K, Berzins K (2012) Impact of EU bioenergy policy on developing countries. Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union, Policy Department, Brussels
Young RA (2001) Uncertainty and the environment. Implications for decision making and environmental policy. Elgar, Cheltenham
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Purkus, A. (2016). Introduction. In: Concepts and Instruments for a Rational Bioenergy Policy. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 55. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31135-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31135-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31134-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31135-7
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)