Abstract
In the Nineties companies were experiencing a number of different strategic and organizational models in running their manufacturing activities to overcome the limitations of the Fordist paradigm in the face of growing complexity and turbulence of the environment. Despite the differences, it was possible at that time to recognize few guiding principles that were common to the most advanced and effective models. In particular, the original paper summarized these principles in three: i) Multi-focusedness and strategic flexibility; ii) Process Integration; and iii) Process Ownership. This approach was called the Strategically Flexible Production. Using data from the International Manufacturing Strategy Survey, the authors were able to show the wide adoption of the paradigm across the sample and across all regions. It also tested the impact of the new paradigm on operational performance, showing better results obtained by those companies that fully adopted the paradigm compared to partial or non-adopters. The commentary underlines that after twenty years the value of this paper resides first of all in having challenged the established paradigms of manufacturing strategy at that time. Also, the paper was among the first ones to underline the value and importance of strategic flexibility and multi-focusedness for manufacturing companies. On both these aspects the paper has been an important platform for future work and for the evolution of the field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Beach, R., Muhlemann, A. P., Price, H. R., Patterson, A., & Sharp, J. A. (2000). Manufacturing operations and strategic flexibility: Survey and cases. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(1), 7–30.
Cagliano, R., & Spina, G. (2000). Advanced manufacturing technologies and strategically flexible Production. Journal of Operations Management, 18, 169–190.
Hayes, R. H., Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. (1988). Dynamic manufacturing. New York: Collier Macmillan.
Jelinek, R., & Goldhar, J., (1984). The strategic implications of the factory of the future. Harvard Business Review, 24–37 (Summer).
Lewis, M. A. (2000). Lean production and sustainable competitive advantage. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(8), 959–978.
Oke, A. (2005). A framework for analysing manufacturing flexibility. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(20), 973–992.
Rosenzweig, E. D., & Easton, G. S. (2010). Tradeoffs in manufacturing? A meta-analysis and critique of the literature. Production and Operations Management, 19(2), 127–141.
Skinner, W. (1969). Manufacturing—Missing link in corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 136–145 (May–June).
Skinner, W. (1974). The focused factory. Harvard Business Review, 113–121 (May–June).
Slack, N. (1983). Flexibility as a manufacturing objective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 3(3), 4–13.
Spina, G., Bartezzaghi, E., Bert, A., Cagliano, R., Draijer, D. & Boer, H. (1996) Strategically flexible production: The mult-focused paradigm. A review and outlook. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 16(11), 20–41.
Takala, J., Leskinen, J., Sivusuo, H., Hirvelä, J., & Kekäle, T. (2006). The sand cone model: Illustrating multi-focused strategies. Management Decision, 44(3), 335–345.
Voss, C. A. (1995). Alternative paradigms for manufacturing strategy. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4), 5–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Voss, C.A. (2016). Strategically Flexible Production: The Multi-focused Manufacturing Paradigm. A Review and Outlook. In: Bartezzaghi, E., Cagliano, R., Caniato, F., Ronchi, S. (eds) A Journey through Manufacturing and Supply Chain Strategy Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31104-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31104-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31103-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31104-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)