Skip to main content

Some Comments on Ordinary Reasoning with Fuzzy Sets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 341))

Abstract

The main goal of Computing with Words is essentially a calculation allowing to automate a part of the reasoning done thanks to the natural language. Fuzzy Logic is the main tool to perform this calculation because it is be able to represent the most common kind of predicates in natural language, graded predicates, in terms of functions, and to calculate with them. However there is still not an adequate framework to perform this task, commonly referred to as commonsense reasoning. This chapter proposes a general framework to model a part of this type of reasoning. The fundamental fact of this framework is its ability to adequately represent noncontradiction, the minimum condition for considering a reasoning as valid. Initially, the characteristics of the commonsense reasoning are analyzed, and a model for the crisp case is shown. After that the more general case in which graded predicates are taken under consideration is studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    If the negation is strong, if μ is contradictory with ρ is equivalent to ρ is contradictory with μ because \(0\, < \,r\, < \,\left( {\mu \,{ \preccurlyeq }\,\rho^{\prime}} \right)\, \le \,\left( {\rho^{\prime\prime}\,{ \preccurlyeq }\,\mu^{\prime}} \right) = \left( { \rho \,{ \preccurlyeq }\,\mu^{\prime}} \right)\).

  2. 2.

    If P is clear from the context we use ρ instead of ρ P for the résumé of P.

  3. 3.

    Note that in a framework of a graded ordering relation, first condition is a strong one but necessary to avoid self-contradiction.

References

  1. Bodiou, G.: Théorie diallectique des probabilités. Gauthier-Villars (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Castro, J.L., Trillas, E., Cubillo, S.: On consequence in approximate reasoning. J. Appl. Non-Class. Logics 4(1), 91–103 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Menger, K.: Morality, Decision and Social Organization: Toward a Logic of Ethics. Springer Science & Business Media (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Popper, K.R.: Conjectures and Refutations. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Trillas, E.: Glimpsing at Guessing. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 281, 32–43 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Trillas, E., Alsina, C.: Elkan’s theoretical argument, reconsidered. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 26(2), 145–152 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Trillas, E.: Non contradiction, excluded middle, and fuzzy sets. In: Di Gesù, V., et al. (eds.) Fuzzy Logic and Applications, pp. 1–11. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trillas, E.: A model for “crisp reasoning” with fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 27(10), 859–872 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Trillas, E.: Some uncertain reflections on uncertainty. Arch. Philos. Hist. Soft Comput. 1, 1–16 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Trillas, E.: How science domesticates concepts? Arch. Philos. Hist. Soft Comput. 1, 1–17 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy logic = computing with words. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 4(2), 103–111 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Part I. Inf. Sci. 8, 199–249 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zadeh, L.A.: A theory of approximate reasoning. Mach. Intell. 9, 149–194 (1979)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Zadeh, L.A.: Computing with Words. Principal Concepts and Ideas, volume 277 of Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zadeh, L.A.: Probability measures of fuzzy events. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 23(2), 421–427 (1968)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This author acknowledges the support of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF/FEDER) under grant TIN2014-56633-C3-1-R.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enric Trillas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trillas, E., de Soto, A.R. (2016). Some Comments on Ordinary Reasoning with Fuzzy Sets. In: Kahraman, C., Kaymak, U., Yazici, A. (eds) Fuzzy Logic in Its 50th Year. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 341. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31093-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31093-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31091-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31093-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics