The Future of Multi-cultural Coaching Psychology

  • Llewellyn E. van ZylEmail author
  • Marius W. Stander


The final chapter of this manuscript focuses on determining the future direction of multi-cultural coaching psychology for both the discipline (research) and the profession (practice). Through thematic content analysis, this chapter aimed to evaluate the 17 manuscripts submitted for this specialist book in order to provide a descriptive overview of the most frequently occurring themes relating to the future direction of coaching psychology within multi-cultural contexts. A brief overview of the research method, data analysis and findings will be presented.


Coaching psychology research Coaching psychology 


  1. Abbott, G., Gilbert, K., & Rosinski, P. (2013). Cross-cultural working in coaching and mentoring. In J. Passmore, D. B. Peterson, & T. Freire (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of the psychology of coaching and mentoring (pp. 484–500). Retrieved from
  2. Baron, L., & Morin, L. (2009). The coach‐coachee relationship in executive coaching: A field study. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20(1), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beattie, R. S., Kim, S., Hagen, M. S., Egan, T. M., Ellinger, A. D., & Hamlin, R. G. (2014). Managerial coaching: A review of the empirical literature and development of a model to guide future practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(2), 184–201. doi: 10.1177/1523422313520476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, D., & Hausman, E. M. (2014). 3 training models in Professional Psychology Doctoral Programs. In The Oxford handbook of education and training in Professional Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Biswas-Diener, R., & Dean, B. (2007). Positive psychology coaching: Putting the science of happiness to work for your clients. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, M. (2006). Key issues in coaching psychology supervision. The Coaching Psychologist, 2(1), 4–8. Retrieved from
  7. Coetzee, M., & Van Zyl, L. E. (2014). A review of a decade’s scholarly publications (2004–2013) in the South African Journal of Industrial Psychology. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 40(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among the five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Donaldson, S. I., Dollwet, M., & Rao, M. A. (2015). Happiness, excellence, and optimal human functioning revisited: Examining the peer-reviewed literature linked to positive psychology. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(3), 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Egan, T., & Hamlin, R. G. (2014). Coaching, HRD, and relational richness: Putting the pieces together. Advances in developing Human Resources, 16(2), 242–257. doi:10/1177/1523422313520475.Google Scholar
  13. Ellinger, A. D., & Kim, S. (2014). Coaching and human resource development examining relevant theories, coaching genres, and scales to advance research and practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(2), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fillery-Travis, A. (2015). Contracting within the business coaching relationship -a guide and a cautionary tale! Discussion paper, Worldwide Association of Business Coaches, Canada.Google Scholar
  15. Gregory, J. B., & Levy, P. E. (2011). It’s not me, it’s you: A multilevel examination of variables that impact employee coaching relationships. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 63(2), 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gyllensten, K., & Palmer, S. (2007). The coaching relationship: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2(2), 168–177.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, R. J., Woods, S. A., & Guillaume, Y. R. R. (2015). The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. doi: 10.1111/joop.12119.Google Scholar
  18. Lawrence, P., & Whyte, A. (2014). What is coaching supervision and is it important? Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 7(1), 39–55.Google Scholar
  19. Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Motsoaledi, L., & Cilliers, F. (2012). Executive coaching in diversity from the systems psychodynamic perspective. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 38(2), 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Palmer, S., & Whybrow, A. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of coaching psychology: A guide for practitioners. London, UK: Routledge Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Parilla, P. F., & Hesser, G. W. (1998). Internships and the sociological perspective: Applying principles of experiential learning. Teaching Sociology, 26, 310–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Passmore, J. (Ed.). (2013). Diversity in coaching: Working with gender, culture, race and age. New York: Kogan Page Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Peng, H., & Pierce, J. (2015). Job-and organization-based psychological ownership: Relationship and outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(2), 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kauffman, C. (2006). Positive psychology: The science at the heart of coaching. In D. R. Stober & A. M. Grant (Eds.), Evidence based coaching handbook: Putting best practices to work for your clients (pp. 219–253). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Koortzen, P., & Oosthuizen, R. M. (2012). Psychological experiences in South African society before the 2010 FIFA World Cup from the systems psychodynamic and positive psychology perspectives. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 38(2), 156–169.Google Scholar
  27. Schutte, F., & Steyn, R. (2015). The scientific building blocks for business coaching: a literature review: Original research. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thompson, M., & Dieffenbach, K. (2015). Measuring professional ethics in coaching: Development of the PISC-Q. Ethics & Behavior, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2015.106057
  29. Van Zyl, L. E. (2013). Research methodology for economic and management sciences. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education International.Google Scholar
  30. Van Zyl, L. E., & Stander, M. W. (2013). A strengths-based approach towards coaching in a multicultural environment. In J. H. D. Cornelius-White, R. Motschnig-Pitrik, & M. Lux (Eds.), Interdisciplinary handbook of the person-centered approach (pp. 245–257). Springer: New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Vella, S. A., Crowe, T. P., & Oades, L. G. (2013). Increasing the effectiveness of formal coach education: Evidence of a parallel process. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 8(2), 417–430. doi: 10.1260/1747-9541.8.2.417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weathington, B. L., Bergman, S. M., & Bergman, J. Z. (2014). Training science-practitioners: Broadening the training of industrial-organizational psychologists. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7(1), 35–38. doi: 10.1111/iops.12101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zammito, J. H. (2004). A Nice derangement of epistemes. Post-positivism in the study of science from Quine to Latour. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Optentia Research Focus Area, Department of Industrial Psychology, School for Behavioural SciencesNorth-West UniversityVanderbijlparkSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations