Abstract
The Ghanaian Constitution Review Process represents an ambitious attempt to reshape Ghanaian democracy in the image of its ostensible sovereign. In an unprecedented consultation process Ghanaians across the country and the diaspora were asked to share their opinions on the 1992 constitution. Moving beyond the letter of the constitution which had ushered in the longest period of constitutional rule in the history of the country, the mandate of the Constitution Review Commission (CRC) expressly included the collation of submissions on legal and administrative changes Ghanaians might demand to ensure the creation of a more responsive, inclusive and equitable polity. One issue explicitly flagged for debate was the future role of Ghana’s diverse set of indigenous political institutions. The constitution review process became an arena for the renegotiation of their future role—as well as for a reassessment of their internal gendered power dynamics: Since British colonial authorities sidelined the female and augmented the male line of complementary dual hierarchies in the largest indigenous polities, the interaction between indigenous and ‘Western’-style institutions has been marked by a continued coloniality of gender and of power. Female indigenous authorities have been protesting this exclusion—and have used the constitution review process to voice their demands. They represent one set of voices that spoke loudly and clearly during the consultations. An analysis of the consultation process and the final report of the CRC examines to which extent the participants bidders have not just been invited to speak, but allowed to be heard.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Submissions the Ghana Constitution Review Commission received in 2010 from the general public have been anonymised. Hereinafter they are referred to as Anonymised Submission 2010.
- 2.
If postcolonial perspectives are conceptualised in this way, the rich tradition of anticolonial writing and theoretical reflection—in the territory of today’s Ghana associated with names such as Wilmot Blyden, Africanus Horton, Mensah Sarbah and other nineteenth century thinkers and activists—becomes an important part of the canon (Korang 2009).
- 3.
Tellingly, Elmina Castle is the oldest ‘modern European’ architectural structure erected outside Europe.
- 4.
While this process is far from complete, it strengthens the position of female indigenous authorities as they demand the implementation of the decision across the country. Since ahemaa have argued that they need to join the Houses to further the interests of women, their success makes it easier for women in their indigenous jurisdictions to demand just that. Given the stark gender imbalance in Ghana’s parliament, indigenous institutions can become important corrective vectors for gendered representation. This ongoing change in the statutory interface illustrates how Ghana’s plural polity creates capacities for representation, decision-making, resource allocation etc. that each subsystem would lack on their own.
References
Abotchie C, Awedoba AK, Odotei IK (2006) Perceptions of chieftaincy. In: Odotei IK, Awedoba AK (eds) Chieftaincy in Ghana: culture, governance and development. Sub-Saharan Publishers, Accra, pp 104–144
Agbodeka F (1971) African politics and British policy in the Gold Coast, 1868-1900: a study in the forms and force of protest. Longman, London
Arhin K (2002) The political systems of Ghana: background to transformations in traditional authority in the colonial and post-colonial periods. Historical Society of Ghana, Accra
Ayittey G (2006) Indigenous African institutions. Transnational Publishers, Ardsley, NY
Bhambra GK (2009) Rethinking modernity: postcolonialism and the sociological imagination. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Boatcă M, Costa S (2012) Postcolonial sociology: a research agenda. In: Rodríguez EG, Boatcă M, Costa S (eds) Decolonizing European Sociology: Transdisciplinary Approaches. Ashgate Publishing, Surrey
Brempong A (2000) The role of Nana Yaa Asantewaa in the 1900 Asante War of resistance. Le Griot 3:49–67
Brempong NA (2006) Chieftaincy, an overview. In: Odotei IK, Awedoba AK (eds) Chieftaincy in Ghana: culture, governance and development. Sub-Saharan Publishers, Accra, pp 27–41.
Chakrabarty D (1992) Postcoloniality and the artifice of history: Who Speaks for “Indian” Pasts? Representations 37:1–26
Constitution Review Commission (2011) Report of the constitution review commission—from a political to a developmental constitution. Accra
Franzki H, Aikins JK (2010) Postkoloniale Studien als kritische Sozialwissenschaft. PROKLA—Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft 158:9–28
Grosfoguel R (2007) The epistemic decolonial turn. Cult Stud 21(2-3):211–223
Hamidu J (2015) Are Ghanaian diaspora middle class? Linking middle class to political participation and stability in Ghana. Afr Dev 40(1):139–157
Hountondji P (1996) African philosophy: myth and reality, 2nd edn. Indiana University Press, Indianapolis
Hutchful E (2002) Ghana’s adjustment experience: the paradox of reform. James Currey, Melton
Kapoor I (2008) The postcolonial politics of development. Routledge, London
Koelble TA, Puma EL (2011) Traditional leaders and the culture of governance in South Africa. Governance 24(1):5–29
Korang KL (2009) Writing Ghana, imagining Africa: Nation and African modernity. University of Rochester Press, Rochester
Lange M (2009) Lineages of despotism and development: British colonialism and state power. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Laumann DH (1993) Compradores-in-Arms’: The Fante Confederation Project (1868-1872). Ufahamu: A Journal of African Studies 21(1-2):120–136
Logan C (2009) Selected chiefs, elected councillors and hybrid democrats: popular perspectives on the co-existence of democracy and traditional authority. J Mod Afr Stud 47(1):101–128
Lugones M (2010) Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia 25(4):742–759
Mamdani M (1996) Citizen and subject: contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Mamdani M (2012) Define and rule: native as political identity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Manuh T (1988) The Asantehemaa’s court and its jurisdiction over women: a study in legal pluralism. Inst Afr Stud Res Rev 4(2):50–66
Nieuwaal EABvRv, van Dijk R (1999) African chieftaincy in a new social and political landscape. Lit Verlag, Münster
Odotei IK (2006) Women in male corridors of power. In: Odotei IK, Awedoba AK (eds) Chieftaincy in Ghana: culture, governance and development. Sub-Saharan Publishers, Accra, pp 81–103
Quayson A (2000) Postcolonialism: theory, practice or process. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK
Ray DI, Reddy PS (2003) Grassroots governance? Chiefs in Africa and the Afro-Caribbean. University of Calgary Press, Calgary
Ubink JM (2008) In the land of the chiefs: customary law, land conflicts, and the role of the state in peri-urban Ghana. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam
Wiredu K (1995) Democracy and consensus in African traditional politics: a plea for a non-party polity. Centennial Rev 39(1):53–64
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aikins, J.K. (2016). Indigenising Democracy? Renegotiating the Role of Indigenous Political Authorities in Ghana’s Constitution Review. In: Dhawan, N., Fink, E., Leinius, J., Mageza-Barthel, R. (eds) Negotiating Normativity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30984-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30984-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30983-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30984-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)