Advertisement

The Nature and Use of Economic Evidence in Competition Enforcement (with Special Emphasis to the Case of South Africa)

  • Tembinkosi BonakeleEmail author
Chapter
  • 657 Downloads
Part of the International Law and Economics book series (ILEC)

Abstract

There is a move towards economic based decision making by competition authorities. This chapter discusses the nature and use of economic evidence in BRICS member countries, with a particular focus on South Africa. BRICS represents countries with similar economic features characterised by, among other things, emerging economies, high concentration levels, high barriers to entry and have experienced or are experiencing transition in their economies. They also face social challenges. Their experience in the use of economic evidence has a lot of similarities but also lessons for each other and the rest of the world, especially developing countries.

Keywords

Economic evidence BRICS Economic expertise Emerging markets Dominance 

References

  1. Faull, J., & Nikpay, A. (2014). The EU law of competition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Fung, S. S., Yu, Y., & Ridyard, D. (2015). The use of economics in the anti-monopoly law of China. Journal of European Competition Law and Practice, 6(4), 268–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gavil, A. I. (2007). The challenges of economic proof in a decentralized and privatized European Competition policy system: Lessons from the American experience. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 4(1), 177–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gifford, D., & Kudrle, R. (2015). The Atlantic divide in antitrust—An examination of US and EU competition policy (World Competition Law and Economics Review, pp. 468–469). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kovacic, W. E., & Shapiro, C. (2000). Antitrust policy: A century of economic and legal thinking. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lianos, I. (2012). The emergence of forensic economics in competition law: Foundations for a sociological analysis (CLES Working Paper Series 5/2012). UCL Centre for Law, Economics and Society.Google Scholar
  7. Petit, N. (2009). From formalism to effects? The commission’s communication on enforcement priorities in applying article 82. World Competition and Economics Review, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Posner, R. A. (1999). The law and economics of the economic expert witness. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(2), 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Veljanovski, C. (2009, October 16–17). Economists in court—A comparative assessment of procedures and experience in Australia and England & Wales from an economist’s perspective. Paper presented to 7th annual University of South Australia Trade Practices Workshop, Adelaide.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Competition Commission South AfricaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations