Abstract
I describe a fictional meeting of a small pharmaceutical company that decides to market a drug with potentially dangerous side effects. I have read the transcript of this meeting to hundreds of students and executives over the years. No one has been able to say what a person in the room could have said that would have changed the outcome. But when we look at the group process mindfully, we see what might have succeeded. This chapter illustrates the psychology of possibility championed by Ellen Langer. A problem that seems impossible to solve does in fact have a possible solution. Objecting to a dangerous course of action is itself dangerous. When approached mindfully, the danger lessons, and a better outcome is more likely.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albert, S. (2001). The Timing of Dissent. Leader to Leader, 22(Fall), 34–45.
Albert, S. (2013). When: The Art of Perfect Timing. San Franscico, CA: Jossey Bass.
Langer, E. (2014). Mindfulness. Â 25th anniversary edition (A Merloyd Lawrence Book) Philadelphia, Pa: Da Capo Press.
Langer, E., & Piper, A. (1987). The Prevention of Mindlessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 280–287.
Solzhenitsyn, A (1973). The Gulag Archipelago, New York, Harper and Row.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Albert, S. (2016). Mindful Dissent. In: Fatemi, S. (eds) Critical Mindfulness. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30782-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30782-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30781-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30782-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)