Skip to main content

Towards a Proof Method for Paradigm

  • 790 Accesses

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNTCS,volume 9660)


The paper describes two perspectives on a verification approach for Paradigm, a coordination modeling language specifying an architecture in terms of components and their collaborations. One perspective concentrates on a single collaboration: per collaboration, properties can be derived through a small set of proof rules. The other perspective concentrates on dynamic dependencies between collaborations: guided by the architecture and driven by shared components behavioral properties of the complete model can be established. Two Paradigm models, a parallel assignment and a linear pipeline of workers and buffers, illustrate the approach.


  • Model Check
  • Phase Transfer
  • Operational Semantic
  • Rule Action
  • Paradigm Model

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-30734-3_17
  • Chapter length: 19 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-30734-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.


  1. Andova, S., Groenewegen, L.P.J., Stafleu, J., de Vink, E.P.: Formalizing adaptation on-the-fly. In: Salaün, G., Sirjani, M. (eds.) Proceedings of FOCLASA. ENTCS, vol. 255, pp. 23–44 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andova, S., Groenewegen, L.P.J., de Vink, E.P.: Towards dynamic adaptation of probabilistic systems. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6416, pp. 143–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Andova, S., Groenewegen, L.P.J., de Vink, E.P.: Dynamic consistency in process algebra: from paradigm to ACP. Sci. Comput. Program. 76(8), 711–735 (2011)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Andova, S., Groenewegen, L.P.J., de Vink, E.P.: Dynamic adaptation with distributed control in Paradigm. Sci. Comput. Program. 94, 333–361 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. de Bakker, J.W., de Vink, E.P.: Control Flow Semantics. Foundations of Computing Series. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng, B.H.C., de Lemos, R., Giese, H., Inverardi, P., Magee, J. (eds.): Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems. LNCS, vol. 5525. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Engels, G., Groenewegen, L.: Specification of coordinated behaviour by SOCCA. In: Warboys, B.C. (ed.) EWSPT 1994. LNCS, vol. 772, pp. 128–151. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Groenewegen, L., de Vink, E.P.: Operational semantics for coordination in paradigm. In: Arbab, F., Talcott, C. (eds.) COORDINATION 2002. LNCS, vol. 2315, pp. 191–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones, C.B.: Development methods for computer programs including a notion of interference. Ph.D. thesis, Oxford University (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pierik, C., de Boer, F.S.: A proof outline logic for object-oriented programming. Theor. Comput. Sci. 343, 413–442 (2005)

    MathSciNet  CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Reimer, W., Schäfer, W., Schmal, T.: Towards a dedicated object-oriented software process modeling language. In: Dannenberg, R.B., Mitchell, S. (eds.) ECOOP 1997 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 1357, pp. 299–302. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. de Roever, W.-P., de Boer, F., Hannemann, U., Hooman, J., Lakhnech, Y., Poel, M., Zwiers, J.: Concurrency Verification: Introduction to Compositional and Non-compositional Methods. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu, Q., de Roever, W.P., He, J.: The rely-guarantee method for verifying shared variable concurrent programs. Formal Aspects Comput. 9(2), 149–174 (1997)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. P. de Vink .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Groenewegen, L.P.J., Kuiper, R., de Vink, E.P. (2016). Towards a Proof Method for Paradigm. In: Ábrahám, E., Bonsangue, M., Johnsen, E. (eds) Theory and Practice of Formal Methods. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9660. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30733-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30734-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)