Skip to main content

Breeding Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Rhizomania

Abstract

Different breeding approaches are employed for identifying the traits of rhizomania resistance. The first screenings were made by means of visual evaluation and chemical analyses of individual beets or plot samples grown in rhizomania diseased field. Advanced selections are usually performed in glasshouse, where more uniform inoculum and growing conditions are possible. Traditional systems are still today employed for reproduction of selected beets. Molecular analyses on the resistance loci allow the accurate selection of the plantlets bearing the trait after different kinds of crosses. Until now, all the genetic resistances used in commercial varieties were identified in Beta maritima. The removal of undesirable traits of the wild parent is among the more difficult steps. Toward the end of the breeding process, the improved genotypes are hybridized with CMS seed-bearers after evaluation of their combining ability. The experimental hybrids are sown in multiyear trials under rhizomania attack for the control of the agronomic value before the registration process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahrens W (1987) Methoden der Selection auf Rizomania Resistenz bei Zuckerrüben. Meded Fac Landbouwkd Rijkuniv Gent Belgium 52:981–990

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroka KH (1985) Zucker und Futterrüben. In: Hoffmann W, Mudra A, Plarre W (eds) Lehrbuch der Züchtung landwirtschaftlicher Kulturpflanzen, vol 2. Paul Parey, Berlin Germany, pp 245–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiss U, von Müller A (1974) Beiträge zur Methodik der Ertrags und Qualitätbestimmung bei Zuckerrüben. Zucker 4:173–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Biancardi E, Campbell LG, Skaracis GN, De Biaggi M (eds) (2005) Genetics and breeding of sugar beet. Science Publishers, Enfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornschauer E, Meierholz K, Wunderlich KH (1993) Seed production and quality. In: Cooke DA, Scott RK (eds) The sugar beet crop. Chapmann & Hall, London UK, pp 121–153

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bosemark NO (1993) Genetics and breeding. In: Cooke DA, Scott RK (eds) The sugar beet crop. Chapman & Hall, London UK, pp 67–119

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burba M, Haufe W, Krüger W (1975) Verhalten von qualitätbestimmenden Inhaltsstoffen der Zuckerrübe während der Herstellung und Lagerung von Gefrierbrei. Zucker 8:411–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürcky K, Büttner G (1991) Gehalt an beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) in der Hauptwürzel von Zuckerrübenpflanzen verschiedener Sorten und deren Laistung unter Rizomaniabefall im Feld. J Phytopathol 131:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büttner G, Mangold B (1998) Tolerance, resistance, immunity. Terms and their significance with reference to rhizomania. Zuckerindustrie 123:694–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Büttner G, Märländer B, Manthey R (1995) Breeding for resistance to rhizomania in sugar‐beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Plant Breed 114:160–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell LG (2002) Sugar beet breeding and improvement. In: Kang MS (ed) Crop improvement: challenges in the twenty-first century. Haworth Press, New York USA, pp 193–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell LG (2014) F1030, F1031, F1032 Sugarbeet germplasm selected from crosses between L19 and three cultivated/wild germplasm. J Plant Reg 9:382–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell LG, Klotz KL, Smith LJ (2008) Postharvest storage losses associated with rhizomania in sugar beet. Plant Dis 92:575–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casarini-Camangi P (1987) Incidenza della rizomania sulla produzione quali-quantitativa della barbabietola da zucchero. Informatore Agrario 45:149–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Chocran WG, Cox GM (eds) (1957) Experimental designs. Wiley, New York USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciafardini G, Marotta B (1989) Use of the most-probable-number technique to detect Polymyxa betae (Plasmodiophoromycetes) in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:1273–1278

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke GM (ed) (1980) Statistics and experimental design. Edward Arnold Ltd, London UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Coons GH (1936) Improvement of the sugar beet. USDA Yearbook of Agriculture, Washington DC USA pp 625–656

    Google Scholar 

  • De Biaggi M (1987) Methodes de selection – Un cas concret. Proc IIRB 50:157–161

    Google Scholar 

  • De Temmerman N, Anfinrud M, Meulemans M, Rich K, Burkholz A, De Bruyne E, Weyens G, Barnes S, Horemans S, Lefebvre M, Bolton MD (2009) Rhizomania resistance in the Tandem® sugar beet variety. Int Sugar J 111:313–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Doney DL, Whitney ED (1990) Genetic enhancement in Beta for disease resistance using wild relatives: a strong case for the value of genetic conservation. Econ Bot 4:445–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis SA, Luterbacher MC (2003) Identification and exploitation of novel disease resistance genes in sugar beet. Pest Manag Sci 59:225–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fujisawa I, Sugimoto T (1979) The reaction of some beet species of sections Patellares, Corollinae and Vulgares to rhizomania of sugar beet. Proc Sugar Beet Res Assoc Jpn 21:31–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerik JS, Hubbard JC, Duffus JE, Koenig R (1990) Soil matric potential effects on infection by Polymyxa betae and BNYVV. In: Koenig R (ed) Proceedings of the 1st Symposium IWGPVFV. Braunschweig, Germany, pp 75–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyl L, Heriz MG, Valentin P, Hehn A, Merdinoglu D (1995) Identification and characterization of resistance to rhizomania in an ecotype of Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima. Plant Pathol 44:819–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorio G, Gallitelli M, Carriero F (1997) Molecular markers linked to rhizomania resistance in sugar beet Beta vulgaris from two different sources map to the same linkage group. Plant Breed 116:401–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giunchedi L, Poggi Pollini C, De Biaggi M (1985) Evaluation of ELISA technique for the screening of rhizomania-tolerant sugar beet genotypes. Proc IIRB 48:385–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Giunchedi L, De Biaggi M, Poggi-Pollini C (1987) Correlation between tolerance and beet necrotic yellow vein virus in sugar-beet genotypes. Phytopathol Mediterr 26:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf A (1987) Was kann in Zukunft von Rizomania toleranten Sorten erwarted werden. Zuckerindustrie 112:405–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassi G, Fantini R, Biancardi E (1988) Prospective method of selecting sugar beet for resistance to rhizomania virus BNYVV. Zuckerindustrie 113:594–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassi G, Fantini R, Biancardi E (1989) A new approach to selecting sugar beet for resistance to rhizomania virus (BNYVV). Phytopathol Mediterr 28:131–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimmer MK, Bean KMR, Qi A, Stevens M, Asher MJC (2008) The action of three beet yellows virus resistance QTLs depends on alleles at a novel genetic locus that controls symptom development. Plant Breed 127:391–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautekèete NC, Piquot Y, van Dijk H (2001) Investment in survival and reproduction along a semelparity–iteroparity gradient in the Beta species complex. J Evolut Biol 14:795–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecker RJ, Helmerick RH, Russell GE (1985) Sugar beet breeding in the United States. Prog Plant Breed 1:37–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horak I, Schlösser E (1980) Rizomania, II. Effect of temperature on development of beet necrotic yellow vein virus and tobacco necrosis virus on sugar beet seedlings. In: Proceedings of the 5th Congress of the Mediterranean Phytopathology Union. Patras Geece, pp 31–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller P, Lüttge U (1991) Stress-Physiology of sugar beet plants (Beta vulgaris L.) in relation to rhizomania disease I. General description and gas exchange measurement. Angew Bot 65:56–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp E (1958) Beta Rüben. In: Roemer T, Rudorf W (eds) Handbuch der Pflanzenzüchtung, vol 3. Paul Parey, Berlin Germany, pp 196–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Kockelmann A, Tilcher R, Fischer U (2010) Seed production and processing. Sugar Technol 12:267–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen K, Hill J (2002) Multi-environment variety trials: analysis and prediction. Variety trials in sugar beet – methodology and design. In: Advances in sugar beet research, vol 4. IIRB, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen RT, Biancardi E (1990) Breeding and performance of rhizomania resistant sugar beet. Proc IIRB 53:69–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu HY, Sears JL, Lewellen RT (2005) Occurrence of resistance-breaking beet necrotic yellow vein virus of sugar beet. Plant Dis 89:464–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane JS (1971) Variety development. In: Johnson RT (ed) Advances in sugar beet production. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 402–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulemans M, Janssens L, Horemans S (2003) Interactions between major genes and influence of the genetic background in the expression of rhizomania resistance. Proc IIRB-ASSBT 1:161–173

    Google Scholar 

  • OEPP/EPPO (2006) Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (benyvirus). OEPP/EPPO Bull 36:429–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oltmann W, Burba M, Bolz G (eds) (1984) Die Qualität der Zuckerrübe, Bedeutung, Beurteilungskriterien und züchterische Massnahmen zu ihre Verbesserung. Paul Parey, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Panella L, Lewellen RT (2007) Broadening the genetic base of sugar beet: introgression from wild relatives. Euphytica 154:383–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paul H, Henken B, Alderlieste MFJ (1992) A greenhouse test for screening sugar-beet (Beta vulgaris) for resistance to beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV). Neth J Plant Pathol 98:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul H, Henken B, Scholten OE, Lange W (1993) Use of zoospores of Polymyxa betae in screening beet seedlings for resistance to beet necrotic yellow vein virus. Neth J Plant Pathol 99:151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelsy F, Merdinoglu D (1996) Identification and mapping of random amplified polymorphic DNA markers linked to a rhizomania resistance gene in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) by bulked segregant analysis. Plant Breed 115:371–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins JM, Jinks JL (1968) Environmental and genotype x environmental components of variability. Heredity 29:237–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters D, Godfrey‐Veltman A (1989) Polymyxa betae zoospores as vectors of beet necrotic yellow vein furovirus. EPPO Bull 19:509–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen G (ed) (1994) Agricultural field experiments. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pferdmenges F (ed) (2007) Occurrence spread and pathogenicity of different beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) isolates, vol 23. Cuvillier Verlag, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Pferdmenges F, Korf H, Varrelmann M (2009) Identification of rhizomania-infected soil in Europe able to overcome Rz1 resistance in sugar beet and comparison with other resistance-breaking soils from different geographic origins. Eur J Plant Pathol 124:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putz C, Richard-Molard M (1983) La rhizomanie de la betterave: une maladie qui a pris une grand extension en France en 1983. C R Acad Agric France 70:370–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush CM, Liu HY, Lewellen RT, Acosta-Leal R (2006) The continuing saga of rhizomania of sugar beets in the United States. Plant Dis 90:4–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholten OE, Lange W (2000) Breeding for resistance to rhizomania in sugar beet: a review. Euphytica 112:219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholten OE, Paul H, Peters D, van Lent JWM, Goldbach RW (1994) In situ localization of beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) in rootlets of susceptible and resistant beet plants. Arch Virol 136:349–361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzbach E (1984) A new approach in the evaluation of field trials. Vortr Pflanzenzücht 6:249–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW (ed) (1987) Principles of crop improvement. Longman, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuitert G (1990) Assessment of the inoculum potential of Polymyxa betae and beet necrotic vein virus (BNYVV) in soil using the most probable number method. Neth J Plant Pathol 96:331–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuitert G (1993) Horizontal spread of beet necrotic yellow vein virus in soil. Neth J Plant Pathol 99:85–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utz HF (ed) (1991) Plabstat 2F. A computer program for statistical analysis of plant breeding experiments. User’s manual

    Google Scholar 

  • Wauters A (2002) Trial techniques: influence on experimental error. In: Variety trials in sugar beet – methodology and design, vol 4. IIRB, Bruxelles, pp 87–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisler GC, Lewellen RT, Sears JL, Liu HY, Duffus JE (1999) Specificity of TAS-ELISA for beet necrotic yellow vein virus and its application for determining rhizomania resistance in field-grown sugar beets. Plant Dis 83:864–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisler GC, Lewellen RT, Sears JL, Wasson JW, Liu HY, Wintermantel WM (2003) Interactions between beet necrotic yellow vein virus and beet soil-borne mosaic virus in sugar beet. Plant Dis 87:1170–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yndgaard F, Pedersen BV, Jonsson BO (2002) Analysis of sugar beet variety trials using mixed model equations. I, Lattice and randomised complete block designs. J Swedish Seed Assoc 3:90–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Zivic J, Knezevic D, Milosevic M, Petrovic S, Stancic I (2011) Genetic diversity of sugar beet parents and hybrids grown in rhizomania conditions. Afr J Agric Res 6:5073–5079

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco De Biaggi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Biaggi, M., Biancardi, E. (2016). Breeding Methods. In: Biancardi, E., Tamada, T. (eds) Rhizomania. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30678-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics