Government and Community Based Primate Conservation Initiatives in Peru

Chapter
Part of the Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects book series (DIPR)

Abstract

Both governmental agencies and local communities in Peru initiate actions directly affecting primate conservation. Governmental initiatives include the creation of protected areas, anti-wildlife traffic campaigns, laws, and law enforcement. Local community initiatives include formal and informal land protection and internal hunting and deforestation controls. There are limitations inherent in both types of initiatives, which compromise their efficiency. Government agencies often suffer from a lack of specialized personnel and resources, corruption, limited communication with the public, and an often contradictory and inadequate legal framework. Community initiatives suffer from lack of access to support from outside institutions. They also lack the economic resources needed to defend lands against invaders or to fund extensive bureaucratic processes in registering protected areas. In both, devoted individuals play a crucial role in turning conservation agendas into action. Communal leaders proposing conservation initiatives sacrifice personal time, money, and often risk their social status. Suspicion, condemnation, and even physical aggression and murder are constant threats. Individuals within state authorities that act against environmental crimes are frequently exposed to pressures from within or outside their own institution and are also subject to threats and personal lawsuits. Although these committed individuals are a small minority, and in most cases do not last long in their positions, the issue is of extreme importance, as they are the ones who often make a noticeable difference on the ground.

Keywords

Community conservation Law enforcement Wildlife traffic Local participation Protected areas Tropical Andes 

References

  1. Adams, W. M. (2004). Against extinction: The history of conservation. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez-Berríos, N. L., & Aide, T. M. (2015). Global demand for gold is another threat for tropical forests. Environmental Research Letters, 10(1), 014006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aquino, R., & Encarnación, F. (1994). Los Primates del Peru. Primate Report, 40, 1–130.Google Scholar
  4. Bóveda-Penalba, A., Vermeer, J., Rodrigo, F., & Guerra-Vásquez, F. (2009). Preliminary report on the distribution of (Callicebus oenanthe) on the eastern feet of the Andes. International Journal of Primatology, 30(3), 467–480. doi:10.1007/s10764-009-9353-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brockington, D., & Duffy, R. (2010). Capitalism and conservation: The production and reproduction of biodiversity conservation. Antipode, 42(3), 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CDC-UNALM, TNC (2006). Planificación para la Conservación Ecoregional de las Yungas Peruanas: Conservando la Diversidad Natural de la Selva Alta del Perú. Lima, PeruGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  8. Cornejo, F. M., Aquino, R., & Jimenez, C. (2008a). Notes on the natural history, distribution and conservation status of the Andean night monkey, Aotus miconax Thomas, 1927. Primate Conservation, 23(1), 1–4. doi:10.1896/052.023.0101.
  9. Cornejo, F., Rylands, A. B, Mittermeier, R. A., & Heymann, E. (2008b) Oreonax flavicauda. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Retrieved March 9, 2015, from www.iucnredlist.org
  10. Debord, G. (1995). Society of the spectacle. New York: Zone Books. (Original work published 1967)Google Scholar
  11. Dietsche, E., Stevens, P., Elliott, D., & Jiwanji, M. (2007). The challenge of mineral wealth: Using resource endowments to foster sustainable development. Peru, Country case study. International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM),Google Scholar
  12. Durand, L., & Vázquez, L. B. (2010). Biodiversity conservation discourses. A case study on scientists and government authorities in Sierra de Huautla Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Land Use Policy, 28, 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eckstein, H. (1975). Case study and theory in political science. In F. Greenstein & H. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of political science (Vol. 7, pp. 79–137). London: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  14. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.Google Scholar
  15. Few, R. (2001). Containment and counter containment: Planner/community relations in conservation planning. Geographical Journal, 167(2), 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fielding, N., & Thomas, H. (2001). Qualitative interviewing. In G. N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (pp. 123–144). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Finer, M., Jenkins, C. N., Pimm, S. L., Keane, B., & Ross, C. (2008). Oil and gas projects in the western Amazon: Threats to wilderness, biodiversity, and indigenous peoples. PloS One, 3(8), e2932.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gallay, A. (2002). The Indian slave trade: The rise of the English empire in the American South, 1670–1717. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gitlitz, J. S. (1995). Decadencia y Sobrevivencia de las Rondas Campesinas del Norte del Peru.Google Scholar
  21. Global Witness. (2014). Peru’s deadly environment—The rise in killings of environmental and land defenders. London: Global Witness.Google Scholar
  22. Gutiérrez-Vélez, V. H., & DeFries, R. (2013). Annual multi-resolution detection of land cover conversion to oil palm in the Peruvian Amazon. Remote Sensing of Environment, 129, 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hess, G. A. (1999). Using ethnography to influence public policy. In J. J. Schensul (Ed.), Using ethnographic data (Ethnographic toolkit, Vol. 7, pp. 57–113). London: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  24. Horwich, R. H., & Lyon, J. (2007). Community conservation: Practitioners’ answer to critics. Oryx, 41(03), 376–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Horwich, R., Lyon, J., & Bose, A. (2011). What Belize can teach us about grassroots conservation. Solutions, 2(3).Google Scholar
  26. Hulme, D., & Murphree, M. (1999). Communities, wildlife and the ‘new conservation’ in Africa. Journal of International Development, 11(2), 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ICAM. (2011). Estrategia de Intervención de la Iniciativa de Conservacion del Bosque de Protección Alto Mayo (ICAM). Iniciativa de Conservacion del Bosque de Protección Alto Mayo, Lima.Google Scholar
  28. Igoe, J., Neves, K., & Brockington, D. (2010). A spectacular eco tour around the historic bloc: Theorising the convergence of biodiversity conservation and capitalist expansion. Antipode, 42(3), 486–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. INEI. (2007). Resultados Definitivos. Censos Nacionales 2007. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática.Google Scholar
  30. INRENA. (2008). Plan Maestro del Bosque de Protección Alto Mayo 2008–2013. LimaGoogle Scholar
  31. IUCN/PSG. (2012). Global primate biodiversity. IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group. Retrieved May 28, 2012, from http://primate-sg.org/diversity.htm
  32. Juo, A. S. R., & Manu, A. (1996). Chemical dynamics in slash-and-burn agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 58(1), 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaimowitz, D. (1996). Livestock and deforestation in Central America in the 1980s and 1990s: a policy perspective. Cifor.Google Scholar
  34. Langdon, J., & Rodriguez, M. (2007). The rondas campesinas of Peru. In L. Hancock & C. Mitchell (Eds.), Zones of peace. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press Inc.Google Scholar
  35. LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (1999). Designing and conducting ethnographic research (Ethnographer’s toolkit, Vol. 1). London: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  36. Leo Luna, M. (1980). First field study of the yellow-tailed woolly monkey. Oryx, 15(4), 386–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leo Luna, M. (1987). Primate conservation in Peru: A case study of the yellow-tailed woolly monkey. Primate Conservation, 8(1), 122–123.Google Scholar
  38. Lo, J., & Monteferri, B. (2014). Conservamos por Naturaleza. Socidad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental. Lima, PeruGoogle Scholar
  39. McDonald, M. A., Healey, J. R., & Stevens, P. A. (2002). The effects of secondary forest clearance and subsequent land-use on erosion losses and soil properties in the Blue Mountains of Jamaica. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 92(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ministerio del Ambiente. (2014a). Cuantificación de la Cobertura de Bosque y Cambio de Bosque a no Bosque de la Amazonía Peruana Periodo 2009–2010–2011. Dirección General de Ordenamiento Territorial: Ministerio del Ambiente, 2014, LimaGoogle Scholar
  41. Ministerio del Ambiente. (2014b). Memoria técnica: Cuantificación de la Cobertura de Bosque y Cambio de Bosque a no Bosque de la Amazonía Peruana. Periodo 2000–2005–2009. Dirección General de Ordenamiento Territorial: Ministerio del Ambiente, PeruGoogle Scholar
  42. Mitchell, J. C. (2006). Case and situation analysis. In T. M. S. Evens & D. Handelman (Eds.), The Manchester school: Practice and ethnographic praxis in anthropology (pp. 23–43). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  43. Mittermeier, R. A., Schwitzer, C., Rylands, A. B., Taylor, L. A., Chiozza, F., Williamson, E. A., et al. (Eds.). (2012a). Primates in Peril: The World’s 25 most endangered primates 2012–2014. IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG), International Primatological Society (IPS), Conservation International (CI), and Bristol Conservation and Science Foundation, Bristol, England.Google Scholar
  44. Mittermeier, R. A., Schwitzer, C., Rylands, A. B., Taylor, L. A., Chiozza, F., Williamson, E. A., et al. (2012b). Primates in Peril: The World’s Top 25 most endangered primates 2012–2014. IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG), International Primatological Society (IPS), Conservation International (CI) and Bristol Conservation and Science Foundation, Bristol, England.Google Scholar
  45. Mittermeier, R. A, Wallis, J., Rylands, A. B., Ganzhorn, J. U., Oates, J. F., Williamson, E. A., et al. (2009). Primates in Peril. The World’s 25 most endangered primates 2008–2010. IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG), International Primatological Society (IPS), and Conservation International (CI), Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  46. Mongabay. (2014). Deforestation jumps in Peru. MongabayGoogle Scholar
  47. Myers, N. (2003). Biodiversity hotspots revisited. Bioscience, 53(10), 916–917. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0916:bhr]2.0.co,2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(6772), 853–858.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Nuñez Palomino, G. (1996). The rise of the rondas campesinas in Peru. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 36, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pacheco, V., Cadenillas, R., Salas, E., Tello, C., & Zeballos, H. (2009). Diversity and endemism of Peruvian mammals. Revista Peruana de Biología, 16(1), 5–32.Google Scholar
  51. Pimbert, M. P., & Pretty, J. (1997). Parks, people and professionals: Putting ‘participation’ into protected area management. In K. Ghimire & M. P. Pimbert (Eds.), Social change and conservation (pp. 297–332). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  52. PROCLIM/CONAM. (2005). Informe del Proyecto PROCLIM—CONAM. Lima: INRENA.Google Scholar
  53. Ravikumar, A., Andersson, K., & Larson, A. M. (2013). Decentralization and forest-related conflicts in Latin America. Forest Policy and Economics, 33, 80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rodríguez, L. O., & Young, K. R. (2000). Biological diversity of Peru: Determining priority areas for conservation. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 29(6), 329–337. doi:10.1579/0044-7447-29.6.329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rojas, A. T. (1990). Rondas, poder campesino y el terror. Cajamarca, Peru: Universidad Nacional de Cajamarca.Google Scholar
  56. Rumpel, C., Chaplot, V., Planchon, O., Bernadou, J., Valentin, C., & Mariotti, A. (2006). Preferential erosion of black carbon on steep slopes with slash and burn agriculture. Catena, 65(1), 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schensul, S. J., Schensul, J. J., & LeCompte, M. D. (1999). Essential ethnographic methods (Ethnographer’s toolkit, Vol. 2). London: Altamira.Google Scholar
  58. Schulenberg, T. S., Stotz, D. F., Lane, D. E., O’Neill, J. P., & Parker, T. A. (2010). Birds of Peru (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Sears, R. R., & Pinedo‐Vasquez, M. (2011). Forest policy reform and the organization of logging in Peruvian Amazonia. Development and Change, 42(2), 609–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. SERNANP. (2015). Áreas Naturales Protegidas de Administración Nacional. Retrieved February 14, 2015, from http://www.sernanp.gob.pe/sernanp/archivos/biblioteca/mapas/ListaAnps_12112014.pdf.
  61. Shanee, S. (2011). Distribution survey and threat assessment of the yellow-tailed woolly monkey (Oreonax flavicauda, Humboldt 1812), Northeastern Peru. International Journal of Primatology, 32(3), 691–707. doi:10.1007/s10764-011-9495-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shanee, N. (2012a). The dynamics of threats and conservation efforts for the tropical Andes hotspot in Amazonas and San Martin, Peru. Canterbury, England: Kent University.Google Scholar
  63. Shanee, N. (2012b). Trends in local wildlife hunting, trade and control in the tropical Andes Biodiversity Hotspot, northeastern Peru. Endangered Species Research, 19, 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shanee, N. (2013). Campesino justification for self initiated conservation actions—A challenge to mainstream conservation. Journal of Political Ecology, 20, 413–428.Google Scholar
  65. Shanee, S., Allgas, N., Shanee, N. & Campbell, N (2015). Distribution survey and ecological niche modeling of the Peruvian night monkey (Aotus miconax) in Northern Peru, with notes on the distributions of Aotus spp. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 7(3):6947–6964.Google Scholar
  66. Shanee, S., Fernadez-Duque, E., & Cornejo, F. M. (2012) Aotus miconax. Retrieved May 29, 2012, from http://www.alltheworldsprimates.org/Home.aspx
  67. Shanee, N., & Shanee, S. (2014). Yellow-tailed woolly monkey (Lagothrix flavicauda): Conservation status, anthropogenic threats, and conservation initiatives. In T. R. Defler & P. R. Stevenson (Eds.), The woolly monkey (Developments in primatology: Progress and prospects, Vol. 39, pp. 283–299). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0697-0_16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shanee, S., & Shanee, N. (2015). Measuring success in a community conservation project: Local population increase in a critically endangered primate, the yellow-tailed woolly monkey (Lagothrix flavicauda) at La Esperanza, Northeastern Peru. Tropical Conservation Science, 8(1), 169.Google Scholar
  69. Shanee, S., Shanee, N., Campbell, N., & Allgas, N. (2014a). Biogeography and Conservation of Andean Primates in Peru. In A. Gursky, A. Krzton, & N. Grow (Eds.) High Altitude Primates (pp. 63–83). SpringerGoogle Scholar
  70. Shanee, N., Shanee, S., & Horwich, R. H. (2014b). Effectiveness of locally run conservation initiatives in north-east Peru. Oryx. Online early additionGoogle Scholar
  71. Shanee, S., Tello-Alvarado, J. C., Vermeer, J., & Boveda-Penalba, A. J. (2011a). GIS risk assessment and GAP analysis for the Andean titi monkey (Callicebus oenanthe). Primate Conservation, 26(1), 17–23.Google Scholar
  72. Shanee, S, Tello-Alvarado, J. C., Vermeer, J., & Bóveda-Penalba, A. J. (2011b). GIS Risk Assessment and GAP Analysis for the Andean Titi Monkey (Callicebus oenanthe). Primate Conservation, 26 (published electronically prior to print)Google Scholar
  73. Smith, J., Colan, V., Sabogal, C., & Snook, L. (2006). Why policy reforms fail to improve logging practices: the role of governance and norms in Peru. Forest Policy and Economics, 8(4), 458–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Soto, B., Basanta, R., Pérez, R., & Diaz-Fierros, F. (1995). An experimental study of the influence of traditional slash-and-burn practices on soil erosion. Catena, 24(1), 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  76. Starn, O. (1999). Nightwatch: The politics of protest in the Andes. Los Angeles, CA: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., & de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
  78. Veiga, L., Bóveda-Penalba, A., Vermeer, J., Tello-Alvarado, J. C., & Cornejo, F. (2013). Callicebus oenanthe. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Retrieved March 9, 2015, from www.iucnredlist.org
  79. Yrigoyen, F. (2002). Towards the complete recognition of “Peasant Ronda” and legal pluralism in Peru Revista Alpanchis: Justicia Comunitaria en los Andes. Instituto de Pastoral Andina, 1(59–60), 31–81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Neotropical Primate ConservationManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations