Creativity, Education and the Future

Chapter
Part of the Educational Research book series (EDRE, volume 9)

Abstract

In this paper I consider the claims representatives of the “creativity movement” make in regards to change and the future. This will particularly focus on the role that the arts are supposed to play in responding to industrial imperatives for the twenty first century. I argue that the compressed vision of the future (and past) offered by creativity experts succumbs to the nihilism so often described by Nietzsche. In the second part of the paper I draw on Stanley Cavell’s chapter ‘Philosophy the Day After Tomorrow’ (from a book with the same name) to consider a future oriented arts education that may not fall victim to nihilism.

References

  1. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  2. Banaji, S., & Burn, A. (2006). The rhetorics of creativity: A review of the Literature. London: Arts Council Engand.Google Scholar
  3. Bearn, G. (2000). Pointlessness and the university of beauty. In P. Dhillon & P. Standish (Eds.), Lyotard: Just education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Cavell, S. (2005). Philosophy the day after tomorrow. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  5. Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools tensions and dilemmas. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craft, A. (2011). Creativity and education futures learning in a digital age. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  7. Hicks, B. (2005). Love all the people: Letters, lyrics, routines. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  8. Hicks, S. V., & Rosenburg, A. (2003). Nietzsche and untimeliness: The ‘Philosopher of the Future’ as the figure of disruptive wisdom. The Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 25, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Humes, W. (2013). The origins and development of curriculum for excellence. In M. Priestley & G. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  10. Kripke, S. (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Nietzsche, F. (1967). Beyond good and evil: A prelude to a philosophy of the future (trans: Kaufmann, W.). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  12. Nietzsche, F. (1986). Human, all too human: A book for free spirits (trans: Faber, M.). Lincoln: Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  13. Nietzsche, F. (1999). The birth of tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Robinson, K. (2001). Out of our minds. Oxford: Capstone.Google Scholar
  15. Saito, S., & Standish, P. (2009). What’s the problem with problem solving. Language, skepticism and pragmatism’. Contemporary Pragmatism, 6(1), 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Troman, G., & Jeffrey, B. (2008, September). Professional cultures of creativity and care in performative primary schools. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, University of Goteborg.Google Scholar
  17. Vlieghe, J. (2015). A poeitic force that belongs to no-one: Reflections on art and education from an Agambenian perspective. In M. Laverty & T. Lewis (Eds.), Art’s teachings. Teaching’s Art (pp. 33–48). New York/London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK

Personalised recommendations