Abstract
This paper focuses on students—future teachers of English. It is believed that their motivation to learn how to teach can also be influenced by subjective theories. The survey study, which aimed at collecting quantitative data, concentrated on a group of 114 student-teachers, from two different training institutions, at different stages of their education. Most of the trainees were women, and it might be interesting to point out that they came from very different communities: villages, little towns, medium towns and cities. The participants were asked to give their opinions on specific variables of the foreign language learning process, such as the role of age and gender, intelligence, learner autonomy, and the learning context. Some questions also referred to the importance of specific skills and subsystems in language education. Many subjective beliefs and theories were revealed, some of which might strongly influence students’ professional development, regardless of their training stage. Afterwards, another group of graduate students took part in an open interview, where they were asked to state what specific personal opinions had been modified in the course of their professional training. Interesting data were collected and categorized, which constituted the qualitative part of the research. I believe that novice teachers, regardless of their training, resort to their safe subjective theories whenever a crisis occurs in the lesson and when an immediate reaction is required. My opinion is that teacher education programs should make use of students’ subjective theories as points of departure for discussion and reflection on their attitudes to the teaching and learning process.
The research described in this paper is a part of a larger study published in Polish (Michońska-Stadnik, 2013).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bongaerts, T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 133–159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Busch, D. (2010). Pre-service teacher beliefs about language learning: The second language acquisition course as an agent for change. Language Teaching Research, 14, 318–337.
Crandall, J. (2000). Language teacher education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 34–55.
Cummins, J. (1983). Language proficiency and academic achievement. In J. Oller (Ed.), Issues in language testing research (pp. 108–130). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2007). Reflective language teaching. From research to practice. London/New York: Continuum.
Genesee, F. (1976). The role of intelligence in second language learning. Language Learning, 26, 267–280.
Horwitz, E. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students. Modern Language Journal, 72, 283–294.
Ingvarsdóttir, H. (2014). Reflection and work context in teacher learning: Two case studies from Iceland. In L. Orland-Barak & C. Craig (Eds.), International teacher education: Promising pedagogies (Part A) (pp. 91–112). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Group.
Ioup, G., Boustangui, E., Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: A case of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 73–98.
Jedynak, M. (2009). Critical period hypothesis revisited. The impact of age on ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Komorowska, H. (2011). Paradigms in language teacher education. In H. Komorowska (Ed.), Issues in promoting multilingualism. Teaching—learning—assessment (pp. 13–38). Warszawa: Foundation for the Development of the Education System.
Kubota, R. (2011). New approach to gender, class, and race in second language writing. In L. Wei (Ed.), The Routledge applied linguistics reader (pp. 262–274). London/New York: Routledge.
Michońska-Stadnik, A. (2000). Attitudes to learner autonomy. IATEFL Research SIG and Teacher Development SIG. Special joint issue, June 2000, pp. 67–71.
Michońska-Stadnik, A. (2013). Teoretyczne i praktyczne podstawy weryfikacji wybranych teorii subiektywnych w kształceniu nauczycieli języków obcych [Theoretical and practical bases for the verification of subjective theories in foreign language teacher training]. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
Ottó, I., & Nikolov, M. (2009). Extra input biased learning: A connectionist account of the adult language learning paradox. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching (pp. 65–85). Poznań/Kalisz: Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts, Adam Mickiewicz University.
Patkowski, M. (1980). The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning, 30, 449–472.
Piasecka, L. (2009). Postawy i osiągnięcia w czytaniu a płeć [Attitudes and achievement in reading and gender]. In J. Nijakowska (Ed.), Język, poznanie, zachowanie: Perspektywy i wyzwania w studiach nad przyswajaniem języka obcego [Language—cognition—behavior: Perspectives and challenges in studies on foreign language learning] (pp. 202–215). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Piechurska-Kuciel, E. (2011). A study of gender-related levels of processing anxieties over three years of secondary grammar school instruction. In J. Arabski & J. Wojtaszek (Eds.), Individual learner differences in SLA (pp. 129–145). Bristol/Buffalo/Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Rumianowska, A. (2011). O różnicach między płciami w kontekście uczenia się i nauczania języków obcych [On gender differences in foreign language learning and teaching]. Neofilolog, 36, 49–56.
Ryan, S., & Mercer, S. (2011). Natural talent, natural acquisition and abroad: Learner attributions of agency in language learning. In G. Murray, X. Gao, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Identity, motivation, and autonomy in language learning (pp. 160–176). Bristol/Buffalo/Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Shehadeh, A., & Coombe, C. (2012). Preface. In A. Shehadeh & C. Coombe (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in FL contexts. Research and implementation (pp. xi–xiv). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sokolik, M. E. (1990). Learning without rules: PDP as a resolution of the adult language learning paradox. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 685–696.
Stuart, C., & Thurlow, D. (2000). Making it their own: Pre-service teachers’ experiences, beliefs, and classroom practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 113–121.
Uylings, H. B. M. (2006). Development of the human cortex and the concept of “critical” or “sensitive” periods. In M. Gullberg & P. Indefrey (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of second language acquisition (pp. 59–90). Malden-Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Wieszczeczyńska, E. (2000). Dlaczego warto rozpoczynać naukę języka obcego w okresie wczesnoszkolnym? [Why is it worth staring foreign language learning in early school education?]. Języki Obce w Szkole [Foreign Languages in School], 6, 6–11.
Wolski, P. (2000). Rola teorii subiektywnych w badaniach autonomii uczenia się języków obcych [The role of subjective theories in reasearch on autonomy in foreign language learning]. Neofilolog, 19, 51–59.
Yost, D. S., Sentner, S. M., & Forlenza-Bailey, A. (2000). An examination of the construct of critical reflection: Implications for teacher education programming in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 39–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Michońska-Stadnik, A. (2016). Future Teachers’ Beliefs About Language Learning. A Study on Selected Subjective Theories. In: Pawlak, M. (eds) Classroom-Oriented Research. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30373-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30373-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30371-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30373-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)