Skip to main content

Infusing Feminist Disability Studies in Our Teaching

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, disability studies has become a vibrant, interdisciplinary field. The five co-authors have worked together to examine the work of feminist disability scholarship with the goal of incorporating disability studies into our current intersectional approach to teaching. We begin with a brief introduction to feminist disability studies, paying particular attention to issues of identity and embodiment, and the ways in which disability, like gender, is socially constructed. We then share how the incorporation of a disability studies lens has influenced each of our courses, providing concrete examples. We examine the creation of new courses, such as the Sociology of Disability and Disability Studies in Education, which both explore disability through a gender, race, and class lens. Additionally, we discuss the integration of disability into existing courses, including an intersectional theory course, and a course on class, stratification, and power. Finally, we present an example of how disability studies perspectives can transform the teaching of a specific subject widely taught in gender-related courses—reproductive justice and the politics of choice. Bringing disability studies into the dialogue does not simply add to the curriculum and make it more inclusive, it also transforms it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adichie, C. (2009). The danger of a single story. http://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story?laguage=en. Accessed 1 Mar 2015.

  • Annamma, S. A. (2014). Disabling juvenile justice: Engaging the stories of incarcerated young women of color with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annamma, S. A., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artiles, A. J., Kozlileski, E. B., & Waitoller, F. R. (Eds.). (2011). Inclusive education: Examining equity on five continents. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baglieri, S., & Shapiro, A. (2012). Disability studies and the inclusive classroom: Critical practices for creating least restrictive attitudes. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2005). Disability, work, and welfare: Challenging the social exclusion of disabled people. Work, Employment and Society, 19(3), 527–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bascom, J. (2011) Just stimming. https://juststimming.wordpress.com/ Accessed 1 Mar 2015.

  • Brown, L. (2015). Autistic Hoya. Retrieved from http://www.autistichoya.com/. Accessed 1 Mar 2015.

  • Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, K. (2013). Ability profiling and school failure (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, C. C. (2011). Two sides of the two-sided coin: Rehabilitation of disabled African American soldiers. In C. M. Bell (Ed.), Blackness and disability: Critical examinations and cultural interventions (pp. 149–161). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. J. (1997). The need for disability studies. In The disability studies reader (pp. 1–6). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1999). The souls of Black folk: Authoritative text, contexts, criticism. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erevelles, N. (2011). (Im)Material citizens: Cognitive disability, race, and the politics of citizenship. In N. Erevelles (Ed.), Disability and difference in global contexts: Enabling a transformative body politic (pp. 147–172). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Erevelles, N., & Minear, A. (2010). Unspeakable offenses: Untangling race and disability in discourses of intersectionality. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 4(2), 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erevelles, N., Kanga, A., & Middleton, R. (2006). How does it feel to be a problem? Race, Disability and Exclusion in Educational Policy. In E. Brantlinger (Ed.), Who benefits from special education? Remediating (fixing) other people’s children (pp. 77–99). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, A. (2014). Mothering while disabled. Contexts, 3(4), 30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K. Q. (2011). Feminist disability studies. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K. Q. (2015). New conversations in feminist disability studies: Feminism, philosophy, and borders. Hypatia: Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 30(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarman, M. (2012). Dismembering the lynch mob: Intersecting narratives of disability, race, and sexual menace. In A. Mollow & R. McRuer (Eds.), Sex and disability (pp. 89–107). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jesudason, S., & Epstein, J. (2011). The paradox of disability in abortion debates: Bringing the pro-choice and disability rights communities together. Contraception, 84, 541–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewieki-Wilson, C., & Cellio, J. (Eds.). (2011). Disability and mothering: Liminal spaces of embodied knowledge. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider, essays and speeches (The Crossing Press feminist series). Freedom: The Crossing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft, R. (2009). Intersectionality and the risk of flattening difference: Gender and race logics, and the strategic use of antiracist strategy. In M. Berger & K. Guidroz (Eds.), The intersectional approach: Transforming the academy through race, class, & gender (pp. 100–117). Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingus, M. (n.d.). Disabled women and reproductive justice. http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=140. Accessed 13 Feb 2015.

  • Neuroqueer. http://neuroqueer.blogspot.com/. Accessed 1 Mar 2015.

  • Nusbaum, E. A. (2010). Fighting professional opinions: Stories of segregation by three California families. In P. Smith (Ed.), Whatever happened to inclusion: The place of students with intellectual disabilities in education (pp. 117–132). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong-Dean, C. (2009). Distinguishing disability: Parents, privilege, and special education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, F. (1940). Los factores humanos de la cubanidad. La Habana: Revista Bimestre Cubana XLV, 1940, 165–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piepmeier, A. (2013). The inadequacy of ‘choice’: Disability and what’s wrong with feminist framings of reproduction. Feminist Studies, 39(1), 159–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, J., & Albanesi, H. (2013). Questioning privilege from within the special education process. Understanding and Dismantling Privilege, 3(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N. (2001). The social model of disability: An outdated ideology? In S. N. Barnett & B. M. Altman (Eds.), Exploring theories and expanding methodologies: Where are we and where we need to go (Research in social science and disability, Vol. 2, pp. 9–28). Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth, E., Wedgwood, N., & Wilson, N. (2012). The dilemma of disabled masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 15(2), 174–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sister Song. (2013). What is reproductive justice? http://sistersong.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=141. Accessed Feb 13 2015.

  • Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2010a). Dismantling hierarchy, queering society. Tikkun, 25(4), 60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. E. (2010b). Reproductive justice is for everyone: Even people you don’t like. FORWARD. http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/08/19/reproductive-justice-is-for-everyone-even-people-you-dont-like/. Accessed 13 Feb 2015.

  • Spelman, E. (1990). Inessential woman. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valle, J. W. (2009). What mothers say about special education: From the 1960s to the present. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Valle, J. W., & Connor, D. J. (2010). Rethinking disability: A disability studies approach to inclusive practices. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, L. (1994). Contextual barriers to collaboration. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 5(4), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendell, S. (1989). Towards a feminist theory of disability. Hypatia, 4(2), 104–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendell, S. (1996). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yergeau, M. (2013). Clinically significant disturbance: On theorists who theorize theory of mind. Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(4). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3876/3405

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Albanesi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Albanesi, H., Ferber, A., Herrera, A.O., Nusbaum, E.A., Ware, L. (2016). Infusing Feminist Disability Studies in Our Teaching. In: Haltinner, K., Pilgeram, R. (eds) Teaching Gender and Sex in Contemporary America. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30364-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30364-2_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30362-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30364-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics