Skip to main content

Semantic Textual Similarity Using Various Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Machine Intelligence and Big Data in Industry

Part of the book series: Studies in Big Data ((SBD,volume 19))

  • 2015 Accesses


The paper is devoted to the semantic textual similarity (STS) problem. Given two sentences of text, s1 and s2, the systems participating in this problem should compute how similar s1 and s2 are, returning a similarity score. We present our experience in this topic, ranging from the knowledge-poor approaches to some compact and easy applied knowledge-rich methods (using structured knowledge base frameworks like WordNet, Wikipedia or BabelNet). The evaluation of the proposed methods was performed using the datasets from SemEval-2014/15 tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others




  3. Kozłowski, M.: OPI: Semeval-2014 task 3 system description. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014), pp. 454–458. Dublin, Ireland, August 23–24 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Navigli, R., Ponzetto, S.: Multilingual WSD with just a few lines of code: The BabelNet API. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 67–72. Jeju, Republic of Korea (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Budanitsky, A., Hirst, G.: Evaluating WordNet-based measures of lexical semantic relatedness. Comput. Linguist. 32(1), 13–47 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Hughes, T., Ramage, D.: Lexical semantic relatedness with random graph walk. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 581–589 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Islam, A., Inkpen, D.: Semantic text similarity using corpus-based word similarity and string similarity. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discovery Data 2(2), 1–25 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Landauer, T., Dumais, S.: A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychol. Rev. 104, 211–240 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Landauer, T., McNamara, D., Dennis, S., Kintsch, W.: Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis. Psychology Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leacock, C., Chodorow, M.: Combining local context and WordNet sense similarity for word sense identification. In: WordNet, An Electronic Lexical Database, pp. 265–283 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lesk, M.: Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: How to tell a pine cone from an ice cream cone. In: Proceedings of the SIGDOC Conference, pp. 24–26 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, Y., McLean, D., Bandar, Z., O’Shea, J., Crockett, K.: Sentence similarity based on semantic nets and corpus statistics. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 18(8), 1138–1149 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mihalcea, R., Corley, C., Strapparava, C.: Corpus-based and Knowledge-based measures of text semantic similarity. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 775–780 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pilehvar, M., Jurgens, D., Navigli, R.: Align, disambiguate and walk: A unified approach for measuring semantic similarity. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1341–1351 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Salton, G., Lesk, M.: Computer Evaluation of Indexing and Text Processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1971)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Salton, G., McGill, M.: Alternation. In: Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, McGraw-Hill, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Turney, P., Pantel, P.: From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 37, 141–188 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Turney, P.: Mining the web for synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 491–502 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maciej Kazuła .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kazuła, M., Kozłowski, M. (2016). Semantic Textual Similarity Using Various Approaches. In: Ryżko, D., Gawrysiak, P., Kryszkiewicz, M., Rybiński, H. (eds) Machine Intelligence and Big Data in Industry. Studies in Big Data, vol 19. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30314-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30315-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics