Advertisement

Enhanced Recovery of Biological Soil Crusts After Disturbance

  • Yunge ZhaoEmail author
  • Matthew A. Bowker
  • Yuanming Zhang
  • Eli Zaady
Chapter
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 226)

Abstract

Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are sensitive to anthropogenic and natural disturbances and are slow to recover in many ecosystems. Rehabilitation of biocrusts can accelerate the recovery of their structure and function and also assist in speeding restoration of degraded ecosystems. In this chapter we review the theoretical foundations, principles, and methods of biocrust rehabilitation and its effect on the recovery of ecological functions. Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility of rehabilitation by inoculations with biocrust organisms. They include the culture of cyanobacteria and mosses in the laboratory and their application as field inoculant. Rehabilitation of lichen crusts has been less successful to date, as lichens require much longer to grow under lab or field conditions. There are still many topics worthy of future study, including the improvement of methods for field application of biocrust inocula, the scaling-up of moss culture techniques, and the exploration of more moss species as inocula.

Keywords

Biological Soil Crust Moss Species Degraded Ecosystem Gurbantunggut Desert Moss Crust 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

We thank David J. Eldridge for supporting the information regarding advances in cultivation of biocrusts in Australia and Dunhai Li and Weibo Wang for the photos and the related information in Fig. 24.2. Our appreciation also goes to Jayne Belnap and Bettina Weber for their constructive suggestions. The unpublished data from Yunge Zhao in the chapter are partial results of the ongoing “western light” project named “Ecological suitability of desiccation tolerance bryophytes and their application in desertification control in arid and semiarid regions.” Matt A. Bowker gratefully acknowledges the hard work of Kyle Doherty and Anita Antoninka and the support of the Bureau of Land Management, the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (US Department of Defense, US Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency), the Natural Resource Preservation Program (US Geological Survey, National Park Service), and the MPG Ranch.

References

  1. Acea MJ, Diz-Cid N, Prieto-Fernández A (2001) Microbial populations in heated soils inoculated with cyanobacteria. Biol Fertil Soils 33:118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acea MJ, Prieto-Fernández A, Diz-Cid N (2003) Cyanobacterial inoculation of heated soils: effect on microorganisms of C and N cycles and on chemical composition in soil surface. Soil Biol Biochem 35:513–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronsen J, Floret C, Le Floc’h E, Ovalle C (1993) Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems in arid and semiarid regions. I. A view from the South. Restor Ecol 1:8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bai XL, Wang Y, Xu J, Li XR, Zhang JG (2003) Characteristics of reproduction and growth of mosses in the soil crust of fixed dunes in Shapotou area. Chin J Desert Res 23:172–176Google Scholar
  5. Belnap J (1993) Recovery rates of cryptobiotic crusts: inoculant use and assessment methods. Great Basin Nat 53:89–95Google Scholar
  6. Belnap J, Eldridge DJ (2003) Disturbance and recovery of biological soil crusts. In: Belnap J, Lange OL (eds) Biological soil crusts: structure, function, and management. Springer, Berlin, pp 363–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belnap J, Gillette DA (1998) Vulnerability of desert biological soil crusts to wind erosion: the influences of crust development, soil texture, and disturbance. J Arid Environ 39:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belnap J, Büdel B, Lange OL (2003) Biological soil crusts: characteristics and distribution. In: Belnap J, Lange OL (eds) Biological soil crusts: structure, function, and management. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bi YH, Hu ZX (2006) Effect of Nostoc sp inoculation on stability of soil aggregates in semi-desert region. In: Geographical Society of China: Natural Geography Committee (ed) Land change science and ecological construction. Commercial Press, Shanghai, pp 560–566Google Scholar
  10. Bi YH, Deng ZY, Hu ZY, Xu M (2005) Response of Nostoc flagelliforme to salt stress. Acta Hydrobiol Sin 29(2):125–129Google Scholar
  11. Booth WE (1941) Algae as pioneers in plant succession and their importance in erosion control. Ecology 22:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowker MA (2007) Rehabilitation of biological soil crusts in theory and practice: an underexploited opportunity. Restor Ecol 15:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowker MA, Belnap J, Davidson DW, Phillips SL (2005) Evidence for micronutrient limitation of biological soil crusts: implications for arid land restoration. Ecol Appl 15:1941–1951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bowker MA, Belnap J, Davidson DW, Goldstein H (2006a) Determinants of biological soil crust abundance across a continuum of spatial scales: support for a hierarchical conceptual model. J Appl Ecol 43:152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bowker MA, Belnap J, Miller ME (2006b) Spatial modeling of biological soil crusts to support rangeland assessment and monitoring. Rangeland Ecol Manage 59:519–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bowker MA, Koch GW, Belnap J, Johnson NC (2008) Nutrient availability affects pigment production but not growth in lichens of biological soil crusts. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2819–2826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bowker MA, Belnap J, Davidson DW (2010) Microclimate and propagule availability are equally important for rehabilitation of dryland N-fixing lichens. Restor Ecol 18:30–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bowler PA (1999) Understory bulbs, grasses, lichens, bryophytes and liverworts transplant successfully in coastal sage scrub (California). Ecol Restor 17:82–83Google Scholar
  19. Bradshaw AD (1996) Underlying principle of restoration. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53(Suppl 1):3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bu CF, Yang JZ, Zhang XC (2011) Cultivation experiment of moss plants from biological soil crusts in Mu Us sandy land. Chin J Desert Res 31:937–941Google Scholar
  21. Chamizo S, Cantón Y, Miralles I, Domingo F (2012) Biological soil crust development affects physicochemical characteristics of soil surface in semiarid ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 49:96–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen LZ, Liu YD, Li DH (2003) Effect of salt stress on physiological and biochemical characteristics of Scytonema javanicum. Chin J Desert Res 23(3):285–288Google Scholar
  23. Chen YQ, Zhao YG, Ran MY (2009) Experimental research on artificial culture method of moss crust in hilly Loess Plateau region. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin 29:586–592Google Scholar
  24. Chen YQ, Zhao YG, Ran MY (2011) Influence of four nutrients on the development of moss crust. J Northwest A&F Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 39:44–49Google Scholar
  25. Chiquoine LP (2012) Restoration of biological soil crusts on gypsum soils in Lake Mead National Recreation Area, Eastern Mojave Desert. Master’s Thesis, University of Nevada, Las VegasGoogle Scholar
  26. Davidson DW, Bowker M, George D, Phillips SL, Belnap J (2002) Treatment effects on performance of N-fixing lichens in disturbed soil crusts of the Colorado Plateau. Ecol Appl 12:1391–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dodi A, Zaady E (2006) Method for promoting soil crust formation. Patent No. 11/920,066 and US 8105646, AU-B-2006245273, ES2340238. http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/8105646/claims.html
  28. Doherty KD (2014) Moss farming: How cultivation of biocrust bryophytes may be the key to arid soil restoration. Master’s Thesis, Northern Arizona University, FlagstaffGoogle Scholar
  29. Doherty KD, Antoninka AJ, Bowker MA, Velasco Ayuso S, Johnson NC (2015) A novel approach to cultivate biocrusts for restoration and experimentation. Ecol Restor 33:13–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Falk DA, Palmer MA, Zedler JB (2006) Foundation of restoration ecology. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. García-Palacios P, Bowker MA, Maestre FT, Soliveres S, Valladares F, Papadopoulos J, Escudero A (2011) Ecosystem development in roadside grasslands: biotic control, plant–soil interactions and dispersal limitations. Ecol Appl 21:2806–2821CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Garcia-Pichel F, Belnap J (2003) Small scale environments and distribution of biological soil crusts. In: Belnap J, Lange OL (eds) Biological soil crusts: structure, function, and management. Springer, Berlin, pp 193–202Google Scholar
  33. Glime JM (2007) Bryophyte ecology, Vol 1. Physiological ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. http://www.bryoecol.mtu.edu/
  34. Goffinet B, Buck WA, Shaw AJ (2008) Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. In: Goffinet B, Shaw AJ (eds) Bryophyte biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 55–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hilty JH, Eldridge DJ, Rosentreter R, Marcia C, Pellant M, Wicklow-Howard MC (2004) Recovery of biological soil crusts following wildfire in Idaho. J Range Manage 57:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Honegger R (2008) Mycobionts. In: Nash TH III (ed) Lichen biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 27–39Google Scholar
  37. Johri BM, Srivastava PS (2001) Reproductive biology of plants. Alpha Science International, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Krishnamurthy V (2001) Reproductive biology of cyanophycota. In: Johri BM, Srivastava PS (eds) Reproductive biology of plants. Alpha Science International, Oxford, pp 45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Krishnamurthy V, Upreti DK (2001) Reproductive biology of lichens. In: Johri BM, Srivastava PS (eds) Reproductive biology of plants. Alpha Science International, Oxford, pp 127–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li XR, Tian F, Jia RL, Zhang ZS, Liu LC (2010) Do biological soil crusts determine vegetation changes in sandy deserts? Implications for managing artificial vegetation. Hydrol Process 24:3621–3630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu YD, Chen LZ, Hu CX (2013) Environmental biology of desert cyanobacteria and combating desertification with biological soil crust. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  42. Maestre FT, Martin N, Diez B, Lopez-Poma R, Santos F, Luque I, Cortina J (2006) Watering, fertilization, and slurry inoculation promote recovery of biological crust function in degraded soils. Microb Ecol 52:365–377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Malam-Issa O, Défarge C, Le Bissonnais Y, Marin B, Duval O, Bruand A, D’Acqui LP, Nordenberg S, Annerman M (2007) Effects of the inoculation of cyanobacteria on the microstructure and the structural stability of a tropical soil. Plant Soil 290:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Memon MKC, Lal M (1981) Problems of development in mosses and moss allies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA B47:115–152Google Scholar
  45. Nath V, Asthana AK (2001) Reproductive biology of bryophytes. In: Johri BM, Srivastava PS (eds) Reproductive biology of plants. Alpha Science International, Oxford, pp 148–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nie HL, Wu N, Liang SM, Wang H, Zhang YM (2006) Effects of different sand burial depths on the growth of fragments of Tortula desertorum. Chin J Arid Zone Res 23:66–70Google Scholar
  47. Nisha R, Kaushik A, Kaushik CP (2007) Effect of indigenous cyanobacterial application on structural stability and productivity of an organically poor semi-arid soil. Geoderma 138:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Park CH, Li XR, Jia RL, Hur JS (2014) Effects of superabsorbent polymer on cyanobacterial biological soil crust formation in laboratory. Arid Land Res Manag 29:55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rao DLN, Burns RG (1990) The effect of surface growth of blue green algae and bryophytes on some microbiological, biochemical, and physical soil properties. Biol Fertil Soils 9:239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rao BQ, Liu YD, Hu CX, Li DH, Shen YW, Wang WB (2009) The technology of man-made algal crust and its applications in control of desertification. Acta Hydrobiol Sin 33:756–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robin P, Rosentreter R (2006) Gametophyte fragment growth of three common desert mosses on artificial and natural substrates. Bryologist 109:166–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scarlett N (1994) Soil crusts, germination and weeds–issues to consider. Victorian Nat 111:125–130Google Scholar
  53. Sears JT, Prithiviraj B (2012). Seeding of large areas with biological soil crust starter culture formulations: Using an aircraft disbursable granulate to increase stability, fertility and CO2 sequestration on a landscape scale. In: Green Technologies Conference, IEEE, pp 173–175Google Scholar
  54. Stark LR, Brinda JC (2013) An experimental demonstration of rhizautoicy, self-incompatibility, and reproductive investment in Aloina bifrons (Pottiaceae). Bryologist 116:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stark LR, Mishler BD, McLetchie DN (2000) The cost of realized sexual reproduction: assessing patterns of reproductive allocation and sporophyte abortion in a desert moss. Am J Bot 87:1599–1608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Stark LR, Nichols L II, McLetchie DN, Smith SD, Zundel C (2004) Age and sex-specific rates of leaf regeneration in the Mojave Desert moss Syntrichia caninervis. Am J Bot 91:1–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Stark LR, Brinda JC, McLetchie DN (2009a) An experimental demonstration of the cost of sex and a potential resource limitation on reproduction in the moss Pterygoneurum (Pottiaceae). Am J Bot 96:1712–1721CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Stark LR, McLetchie DN, Roberts SP (2009b) Gender differences and a new adult eukaryotic record for upper thermal tolerance in the desert moss Syntrichia caninervis. J Therm Biol 34:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stark LR, McLetchie DN, Eppley SM (2010) Sex ratios and the shy male hypothesis in the moss Bryum argenteum (Bryaceae). Bryologist 113:788–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tang DS, Wang WB, Li DH, Hu CX, Liu YD (2007) Effects of artificial algal crust on soil enzyme activities of Hopq Desert, China. J Acta Hydrobiol Sin 31:339–344Google Scholar
  61. Tian GQ, Bai XL, Xu J, Wang XD (2005) Experimental studies on natural regeneration and artificial cultures of moss crusts on fixed dunes in the Tengger Desert. Chin J Acta Phytoecol Sin 29:164–169Google Scholar
  62. Tian GQ, Bai X, Xu J, Wang X (2006) Experimental studies on the natural restoration and the artificial culture of the moss crusts on fixed dunes in the Tengger Desert, China. Front Biol China 1:13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. van Andel J, Aronson J (2006) Restoration ecology: the new frontier. Blackwell Science, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang WB, Liu YD, Li DH, Hu CX, Rao BQ (2008) Feasibility of cyanobacterial inoculation for biological soil crusts formation in desert area. Soil Biol Biochem 41(5):926–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Whitton BA, Potts M (2000) Introduction to the cyanobacteria. In: Whitton BA, Potts M (eds) The ecology of cyanobacteria: their diversity in time and space. Kluwer Academic, London, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  66. Wu YW, Rao BQ, Wu PP, Liu YD, Li GB, Li DH (2013) Development of artificially induced biological soil crusts in fields and their effects on top soil. Plant Soil 370:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Xiao B, Zhao YG, Shao MA (2008a) Artificial cultivation of biological soil crust and its effects on soil and water conservation in water-wind erosion crisscross region of Loess Plateau, China. Acta Agrestia Sin 16(1):28–33Google Scholar
  68. Xiao B, Zhao YG, Xu MX, Shao MA (2008b) Soil nutrients accumulation and their loss risk under effects of biological soil crust in Loess Plateau of northern Shaanxi Province, China. Chin J Appl Ecol 19(5):1019–1026Google Scholar
  69. Xiao B, Wang Q, Zhao Y, Shao M (2011) Artificial culture of biological soil crusts and its effects on overland flow and infiltration under simulated rainfall. Appl Soil Ecol 48:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Xie ZM (2006) Study on the responses of desert algae to ultraviolet radiation and the algae crust formation under field conditions. Doctoral dissertation. Institute of Hydrobiology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  71. Xie ZM, Liu YD, Hu CX, Chen LZ, Li DH (2007) Relationships between the biomass of algal crusts in fields and their compressive strength. Soil Biol Biochem 39:567–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Xu J, Ning YY (2010) Impact of overgrazing and enclosing on biomass and soil factors of the microbiotic soil crusts in Horqin Sandy land. Chin J Desert Res 30:824–830Google Scholar
  73. Xu S, Yin C, He M, Wang Y (2008) A technology for rapid reconstruction of moss-dominated soil crusts. Environ Eng Sci 25:1129–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Xu JJ, Zhang DL, Wu GQ, Wang GH, Liu YD, Hu CX (2010) Effect of wind stress on photosynthetic activity of Microcoleus vaginatus crusts. Acta Hydrobiol Sin 34(2):575–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yan DR, Yang JP, An XL, Ren JM (2004) Report of crust sand fixation by alga. Chin J Arid Land Resour Environ 18:147–150Google Scholar
  76. Zhang BC, Zhang YM, Su YG, Wang JZ, Zhang J (2013) Responses of microalgal-microbial biomass and enzyme activities of biological soil crusts to moisture and Inoculated Microcoleus vaginatus gradients. Arid Land Res Manag 27:216–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhao YG, Xu MX (2013) Runoff and soil loss from revegetated grasslands in hilly Loess Plateau region, China: influence of biocrust and plant patches. J Hydrol Eng 18:387–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zheng YP, Xu M, Zhao JC, Bei SQ, Hao LH (2011) Effects of inoculated Microcoleus vaginatus on the structure and function of biological soil crusts of desert. Biol Fertil Soils 47:473–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yunge Zhao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matthew A. Bowker
    • 2
  • Yuanming Zhang
    • 3
  • Eli Zaady
    • 4
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water ConservationNorthwest A&F UniversityYanglingP. R. China
  2. 2.School of ForestryNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biogeography and Bioresource, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and GeographyChinese Academy of SciencesUrumqi, XinjiangP. R. China
  4. 4.Department of Natural Resources, Agricultural Research Organization, Institute of Plant Sciences, Gilat Research CenterNegev 2Israel

Personalised recommendations