Skip to main content

Abstract

The response correction techniques described in Chap. 6 utilized explicit formulation where the relationship between the high-fidelity model and the surrogate is quantified by a number of parameters that need to be extracted in order to identify the model. In this chapter, we focus on nonparametric methods, where the relationship between the low- and high-fidelity models is identified, or better said, directly extracted from the model responses; however, it is not explicitly given by any formula. In particular, in the optimization context, the surrogate model prediction may be obtained by tracking the response changes of the low-fidelity model and applying these changes to the known high-fidelity model response at a certain reference design. The formulation of nonparametric techniques is generally more complex and involves more restrictive assumptions regarding their applicability. However, these methods are normally characterized by a better generalization capability than the parametric techniques (cf. Chap. 6). The particular techniques described in this chapter are adaptive response correction, adaptive response prediction, and shape-preserving response prediction. We provide their formulations and illustrate their performance using design problems that involve airfoil shapes, and microwave devices, as well as antenna structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, I.H., and Von Doenhoff, A.E., Theory of Wing Sections, Dover Publications, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agilent ADS (2011), Agilent Technologies, 1400 Fountaingrove Parkway, Santa Rosa, CA 95403–1799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandler, J.W., Biernacki, R.M., Chen, S.H., Grobelny, P.A., Hemmers, R.H., (1994) Space mapping technique for electromagnetic optimization. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 42, 2536–2544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandler, J.W., Cheng, Q.S., Gebre-Mariam, D.H., Madsen, K., Pedersen, F., Søndergaard, J. (2003) EM-based surrogate modeling and design exploiting implicit, frequency and output space mappings. IEEE Int. Microwave Symp. Digest, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 1003–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z.N. (2008) Wideband microstrip antennas with sandwich substrate. IET Microw. Ant. Prop., vol. 2, pp. 538–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Q.S., Bandler, J.W., Koziel, S., Bakr, M.H., and Ogurtsov, S. (2010) The state of the art of microwave CAD: EM-based optimization and modeling. Int. J. RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Eng., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 475–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conn, A.R., Gould, N.I.M., Toint, P.L. (2000) Trust Region Methods. MPS-SIAM Series on Optimization.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • CST Microwave Studio (2013). CST AG, Bad Nauheimer Str. 19, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dielectric resonator filter, Examples (2011) CST Microwave Studio, ver. 2011, CST AG, Bad Nauheimer Str. 19, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • em TM Version 12.54 (2010), Sonnet Software, Inc., 100 Elwood Davis Road, North Syracuse, NY 13212, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEKO (2008), Suite 5.4, EM Software & Systems-S.A. (Pty) Ltd, 32 Techno Lane, Technopark, Stellenbosch, 7600, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, A.I.J., Keane, A.J. (2009) Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization, Prog. in Aerospace Sciences, 45, pp. 50−79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, X., Ma, Z., Cai, P., Anada, T., and Hagiwara, G. (2008) A microstrip dual-band bandpass filter with reduced size and improved stopband characteristics. Microwave and Opt. Tech. Lett., 50, pp. 618–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, M.Y., and Wang, S.M. (2005) Compact and wideband microstrip bandstop filter. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Component Letters, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 472–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A.G., Huijbregts, Ch.J. (1981) Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolda, T.G., Lewis, R.M., Torczon, V. (2003). Optimization by direct search: new perspectives on some classical and modern methods. SIAM Rev., 45, pp. 385−482.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koziel, S., Bandler, J.W., Madsen, K. (2006) A space mapping framework for engineering optimization: theory and implementation. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., 54. 3721-3730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koziel, S., Bandler, J.W., Madsen, K. (2006b) Theoretical justification of space-mapping-based modeling utilizing a data base and on-demand parameter extraction. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 4316-4322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koziel, S., Bandler, J.W., Madsen, K. (2009a) Space mapping with adaptive response correction for microwave design optimization. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., 57, pp. 478–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koziel, S. (2010a) Shape-preserving response prediction for microwave design optimization. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Tech., 58, pp. 2829–2837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koziel, S., (2010c) Multi-fidelity multi-grid design optimization of planar microwave structures with Sonnet. International Review of Progress in Applied Computational Electromagnetics, Tampere, Finland, 719–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koziel, S. (2010d) Improved microwave circuit design using multipoint-response-correction space mapping and trust regions. Int. Symp. Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics, ANTEM 2010, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koziel, S. (2010e) Shape-preserving response prediction for microwave circuit modeling. IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Dig., Anaheim, CA, pp. 1660–1663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koziel, S. (2010g) Computationally efficient multi-fidelity multi-grid design optimization of microwave structures. Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, 25, 578–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koziel, S., and Leifsson, L. (2012a) Multi-fidelity airfoil shape optimization with adaptive response prediction.AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koziel, S., and Leifsson, L. (2012c) Adaptive Response Correction for Surrogate-Based Airfoil Shape Optimization. 30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koziel, S., and Leifsson, L. (2013c) Surrogate-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization by Variable-Resolution Models. AIAA Journal, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koziel, S., Ogurtsov, S. (2011d) Bandwidth enhanced design of dielectric resonator antennas using surrogate-based optimization. IEEE Int. Symp. Antennas Prop., Spokane, WA, July 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koziel, S., Leifsson, L. (2016). Nonparametric Response Correction Techniques. In: Simulation-Driven Design by Knowledge-Based Response Correction Techniques. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30115-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics