Skip to main content

The Effect of EPR on the Markets for Waste

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Supply Chain Management ((SSSCM,volume 3))

Abstract

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), a widely used policy tool, requires producers to assume financial and/or operational responsibility for ensuring their end-of-life products are properly collected and treated. EPR implementation in today’s economy, however, poses a change as some basic, underlying assumptions do not hold. Today’s economy challenges assumptions that (1) waste is costly to recover, (2) waste consists only of end-of-life products, and (3) waste is homogenous with respect to its geographic location, design, or condition. In this chapter, we discuss the impact of EPR on waste markets when these assumptions are challenged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, under the WEEE Directive, “producer” is defined as “any person who, irrespective of the selling technique used (1) manufactures and sells EEE under his own brand, (2) resells under his own brand equipment produced by other suppliers, (3) imports or exports EEE on a professional basis into a Member State.”

  2. 2.

    We call these “unofficial” because they are not registered under a regulatory body and the amount of waste they handle does not count toward meeting regulatory targets.

  3. 3.

    Figure 14.1 is only representative and not comprehensive. In reality, many other loops may exist between entities involved in this reverse chain and some relationships we show may not exist under certain circumstances. Furthermore, the figure only shows the flow of e-waste from B2C; it is argued that almost all e-waste originating from B2B customers ends up in the hands of unofficial entities (Huisman et al. 2012).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gökçe Esenduran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Esenduran, G., Atasu, A. (2016). The Effect of EPR on the Markets for Waste. In: Atasu, A. (eds) Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30094-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics