Abstract
Some of the most important elements of any surgical procedure are the decisions that the surgeon makes before, during, and after the surgery itself. Yet, the process of how surgeons make these decisions has not been studied adequately. Despite its enormous significance and regardless of the implications that this decision-making process has on surgical outcomes, the subject has received minimal attention in the literature. Subsequently, there are only a few studies that investigate how these decisions are made, although these decision-making processes are of great importance both for training and patient safety purposes. Often, surgeons have difficulty in describing exactly how they came to specific decision during surgery. Some describe these decisions as “intuition” or “gut-level” responses. Additionally, many factors affect decision-making abilities of surgeons during operations. These factors are the physiologic state of the surgeon, teamwork, external pressures at work, and the surgeon’s ability to adapt quickly to a changing environment, to name only a few. Yet, the question remains, how to perform an evaluation of the surgical decision and gaining a better understanding of a seemingly gut-level process, which helps surgeons combat the external factors experienced before and during surgery? This chapter will attempt to dissect further multiple factors that may explain further how surgeons make decisions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Latifi R. Surgical decision-making process: more questions than answers. Scand J Surg. 2013;102(3):139–40.
Abernathy C, Hamm R. Surgical intuition. What it is and how to get it. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 1995.
Gawande A. The checklist manifesto: how to get things right. New York: Metropolitan Books, Henry Holt and Company, LLC; 2009.
Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV, Elstein AS, et al. Clinical decision analysis. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1980.
Mitchell L, Flin R, Youngson G, Malik M, Ahmed I. Intraoperative surgical decision-making: a video study. International conference on naturalistic decision making. Marseille, France; 2013.
Moulton C, Regehr G, Lingard L, Merritt C, Macrae H. Slowing down when you should: initiators and influences of the transition from the routine to the effortful. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1019–26.
Massarweh N, Devlin A, Gaston SR, Broeckel EJ, Flum D. Risk tolerance and bile duct injury: surgeon characteristics, risk taking preference, and common bile duct injuries. Am J Surg. 2009;209:17–24.
Dekker S, Hugh TB. Laparoscopic bile duct injury: understanding the psychology and heuristics of the error. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:1109–14.
Endsley MR. Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic environments. Hum Factors. 1995;37:32–64.
Endsley MR. A survey of situation awareness requirements in air-to-air combat fighters. Int J Aviat Psychol. 1993;3:157–68.
Endsley MR. Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors. 1995;37:65–84.
Endsley MR. The application of human factors to the development of expert systems for advanced cockpits. In Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on aviation psychology. Columbus: Ohio State University; 1987. p. 167–71.
Gaba DM, Howard SK, Small SD. Situation awareness in anesthesiology. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc. 1995;37:20–33.
Durso FT, Sethumadhavan A. Situation awareness: understanding dynamic environments. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc. 2008;50:442–50.
Shah H, Hamid ABD, Waterson P, Hignett S. Situation awareness to support decision-making among emergency care practitioners. In Proceedings of NDM9, the 9th international conference on naturalistic decision-making, London, UK; June 2009.
Flin R, Youngson G, Yule S. How do surgeons make intraoperative decisions? Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16:235–9.
Wood G, Batt J, Appelboam A, Harris A, Wilson MR. Exploring the impact of expertise, clinical history, and visual search on electrocardiogram interpretation. Med Decis Mak. 2014;34:75–85.
Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Krupinski EA, Mello-Thoms C. Using gaze-tracking data and mixture distribution analysis to support a holistic model for the detection of cancers on mammograms. Acad Radiol. 2008;15(7):881–6.
Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N, Rowley D. Development of a rating system for surgeons’ non-technical skills. Med Educ. 2006;40:1098–104.
van Gaal S, Lamme VAF. Unconscious high-level information processing: implication for neurobiological theories of consciousness. Neuroscientist. 2012;18:287–303.
Cowey A. The blindsight saga. Exp Brain Res. 2010;200:3–24.
Tamietto M, Castelli L, Vighetti S, Perozzo P, Geminiani G, Weiskrantz L, et al. Unseen facial and bodily expressions trigger fast emotional reactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:17661–6.
Tamietto M, de Gelder B. Neural bases of the nonconscious perception of emotional signals. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11:697–709.
Lamme VAF, Roelfsema PR. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends Neurosci. 2000;23:571–9.
Breitmeyer BG, Ogmen H, editors. Visual masking: time slices through conscious and unconscious vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
Klotz W, Neumann O. Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999;25:976–92.
Bush G, Luu P, Posner MI. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000;4(6):215–22.
Lane RD, Reiman EM, Axelrod B, Yun LS, Holmes A, Schwartz GE. Neural correlates of levels of emotional awareness. Evidence of an interaction between emotion and attention in the anterior cingulate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998;10(4):525–35.
Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N, Rowley D, Youngson G. Surgeons’ non-technical skills in the operating room: reliability testing of the NOTSS behaviour rating system. World J Surg. 2008;32:548–56.
Chatterjee S, Ng J, Kwan K, Matsumoto E. Assessing the surgical decision making abilities of novice and proficient urologists. J Urol. 2009;181:2251–6.
Acknowledgements
There are no identifiable conflicts of interests to report.
The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript.
The author would like to thank Elizabeth Teilly, PhD for her contributions to this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Latifi, R. (2016). The Anatomy of the Surgeon’s Decision-Making. In: Surgical Decision Making. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29824-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29824-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29822-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29824-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)