Skip to main content

The Anatomy of the Surgeon’s Decision-Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgical Decision Making

Abstract

Some of the most important elements of any surgical procedure are the decisions that the surgeon makes before, during, and after the surgery itself. Yet, the process of how surgeons make these decisions has not been studied adequately. Despite its enormous significance and regardless of the implications that this decision-making process has on surgical outcomes, the subject has received minimal attention in the literature. Subsequently, there are only a few studies that investigate how these decisions are made, although these decision-making processes are of great importance both for training and patient safety purposes. Often, surgeons have difficulty in describing exactly how they came to specific decision during surgery. Some describe these decisions as “intuition” or “gut-level” responses. Additionally, many factors affect decision-making abilities of surgeons during operations. These factors are the physiologic state of the surgeon, teamwork, external pressures at work, and the surgeon’s ability to adapt quickly to a changing environment, to name only a few. Yet, the question remains, how to perform an evaluation of the surgical decision and gaining a better understanding of a seemingly gut-level process, which helps surgeons combat the external factors experienced before and during surgery? This chapter will attempt to dissect further multiple factors that may explain further how surgeons make decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Latifi R. Surgical decision-making process: more questions than answers. Scand J Surg. 2013;102(3):139–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abernathy C, Hamm R. Surgical intuition. What it is and how to get it. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gawande A. The checklist manifesto: how to get things right. New York: Metropolitan Books, Henry Holt and Company, LLC; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV, Elstein AS, et al. Clinical decision analysis. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchell L, Flin R, Youngson G, Malik M, Ahmed I. Intraoperative surgical decision-making: a video study. International conference on naturalistic decision making. Marseille, France; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moulton C, Regehr G, Lingard L, Merritt C, Macrae H. Slowing down when you should: initiators and influences of the transition from the routine to the effortful. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1019–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Massarweh N, Devlin A, Gaston SR, Broeckel EJ, Flum D. Risk tolerance and bile duct injury: surgeon characteristics, risk taking preference, and common bile duct injuries. Am J Surg. 2009;209:17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dekker S, Hugh TB. Laparoscopic bile duct injury: understanding the psychology and heuristics of the error. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:1109–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Endsley MR. Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic environments. Hum Factors. 1995;37:32–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Endsley MR. A survey of situation awareness requirements in air-to-air combat fighters. Int J Aviat Psychol. 1993;3:157–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Endsley MR. Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors. 1995;37:65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Endsley MR. The application of human factors to the development of expert systems for advanced cockpits. In Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on aviation psychology. Columbus: Ohio State University; 1987. p. 167–71.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Small SD. Situation awareness in anesthesiology. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc. 1995;37:20–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Durso FT, Sethumadhavan A. Situation awareness: understanding dynamic environments. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc. 2008;50:442–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shah H, Hamid ABD, Waterson P, Hignett S. Situation awareness to support decision-making among emergency care practitioners. In Proceedings of NDM9, the 9th international conference on naturalistic decision-making, London, UK; June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Flin R, Youngson G, Yule S. How do surgeons make intraoperative decisions? Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16:235–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wood G, Batt J, Appelboam A, Harris A, Wilson MR. Exploring the impact of expertise, clinical history, and visual search on electrocardiogram interpretation. Med Decis Mak. 2014;34:75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Krupinski EA, Mello-Thoms C. Using gaze-tracking data and mixture distribution analysis to support a holistic model for the detection of cancers on mammograms. Acad Radiol. 2008;15(7):881–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N, Rowley D. Development of a rating system for surgeons’ non-technical skills. Med Educ. 2006;40:1098–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van Gaal S, Lamme VAF. Unconscious high-level information processing: implication for neurobiological theories of consciousness. Neuroscientist. 2012;18:287–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cowey A. The blindsight saga. Exp Brain Res. 2010;200:3–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tamietto M, Castelli L, Vighetti S, Perozzo P, Geminiani G, Weiskrantz L, et al. Unseen facial and bodily expressions trigger fast emotional reactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:17661–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Tamietto M, de Gelder B. Neural bases of the nonconscious perception of emotional signals. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11:697–709.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lamme VAF, Roelfsema PR. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends Neurosci. 2000;23:571–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Breitmeyer BG, Ogmen H, editors. Visual masking: time slices through conscious and unconscious vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Klotz W, Neumann O. Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999;25:976–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bush G, Luu P, Posner MI. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000;4(6):215–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lane RD, Reiman EM, Axelrod B, Yun LS, Holmes A, Schwartz GE. Neural correlates of levels of emotional awareness. Evidence of an interaction between emotion and attention in the anterior cingulate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998;10(4):525–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N, Rowley D, Youngson G. Surgeons’ non-technical skills in the operating room: reliability testing of the NOTSS behaviour rating system. World J Surg. 2008;32:548–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chatterjee S, Ng J, Kwan K, Matsumoto E. Assessing the surgical decision making abilities of novice and proficient urologists. J Urol. 2009;181:2251–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

There are no identifiable conflicts of interests to report.

The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript.

The author would like to thank Elizabeth Teilly, PhD for her contributions to this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rifat Latifi M.D., F.A.C.S. .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Latifi, R. (2016). The Anatomy of the Surgeon’s Decision-Making. In: Surgical Decision Making. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29824-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29824-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29822-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29824-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics