Skip to main content

Methods of Ascertainment of Personal Damage in France

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Personal Injury and Damage Ascertainment under Civil Law

Abstract

The chapter illustrates the historical, judicial and juridical framework of personal injury assessment and compensation in France, describing the expert’s qualification and competences and detailing the ascertainment methodology and criteria of evaluation utilized for identifying, describing and estimating any personal injury, its temporary and permanent consequences and the causal value/link between the event and the injury and between the injury and the impairment/disability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Black D (1998a) The limitations of evidence. J R Coll Physicians Lond 32:23

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, Hebert L, Localio AR, Lawthers AG, Newhouse JP, Weiler PC, Hiatt HH (1991a) Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients—results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 324:370–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer G, Fetters MD, Munro AP, Goldman EB (1997a) Adverse events in primary care identified from a risk-management database. J Fam Pract 45:40–46

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hofer T, Herr E, Hayward R (2000a) What is an error? Eff Clin Pract 6:261–269

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hughes G (2009a) Litigation, redress and making amends. Emerg Med J 26:844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hurwitz B (2004) How does evidence based guidance influence determinations of medical negligence? J R Coll Physicians Lond (BMJ 329:1024)

    Google Scholar 

  7. O’Neil AC, Petersen LA, Cook EF, Bates DW, Lee TH, Brennan TA (1993a) Physician reporting compared with medical-record review to identify adverse medical events. Ann Intern Med 119:370–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scobie S, Thomson R, McNeil JJ, Phillips PA (2006a) Measurements of the safety and quality of health care. Med J Aust 184:S51–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Baccino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baccino, E., Raul, J.S. (2016). Methods of Ascertainment of Personal Damage in France. In: Ferrara, S., Boscolo-Berto, R., Viel, G. (eds) Personal Injury and Damage Ascertainment under Civil Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29812-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics