Skip to main content

Quantifying Seals and Saturations: Capillary Pressure, Pseudo-capillary Pressure and Quantitative Show Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Oil and Gas Shows and Seals in the Search for Hydrocarbons
  • 2299 Accesses

Abstract

Capillary pressure exerts a fundamental control on seal capacity and reservoir behavior. Pore throat radius is a key factor in seal capacity, with the smallest pore throats requiring the most buoyancy pressure to displace water in the pore systems with hydrocarbons. Interfacial tension and wettability play additional roles. When converted to height above free water plots, capillary pressure data can give a good approximation of the free water level if the water saturation is known.

Capillary pressure data can be expensive and time consuming to require. However, by studying flow units in rocks using Winland analysis, porosity and permeability can be used to estimate a pore throat radius. Once this is done, pseudo-capillary pressure plots can be make which give a good approximation of the height above fee water from the permeability and porosity data alone. These data can then be used to estimate seal capacities and reservoir performance.

Seals and traps along migration routes can be modeled using software packages or with simple grid manipulation. Quantitative show analysis can help identify seals, force modification of paleogeographic maps to fit hydrocarbon shows, or help determine seal capacities on faults. Once this is done, migration can be modeled using seals along the migration pathways, providing a much more robust prospect inventory than can be achieved by looking for four-way closures alone.

In addition, Appendix B shows how to build an Excel spreadsheet to visualize potential pore throats sizes. Appendix C illustrates how to build Excel spreadsheets to analyze mercury-injection capillary pressure data and Appendix D similar solutions for pseudo-capillary pressure using porosity and permeability as inputs. Appendix E provides some tips on how to create a seal grid for trap analysis using ARCGIS shapefiles and feature classes.

The major intent of this chapter is to get the reader to the point where a simple knowledge of porosity and permeability, from any source, can lead to a quantitative estimate of seal capacity or reservoir performance. To get to this point, you will learn how to construct pseudo-capillary pressure curves from calculations using regression equations which estimate pore throat size from porosity and permeability data.

Being able to assess seal capacity or position in a trap from Sw in terms of height above free water is key to understanding traps and hydrocarbon shows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdallah W, Buckley JS, Carnegie A, Edwards J, Fordham E, Graue A, Habashy T, Seleznev N, Signer C, Hussain H, Montaron B, Ziauddin M (2007) Fundamentals of wettability. Oilfield Review, Schlumberger, pp 44–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Asquith G, Krygowski D (eds) (2004) Basic well log analysis, 2nd edn, AAPG methods in exploration series. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, 244 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg R (1975) Capillary pressures in stratigraphic traps. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 59:939–956

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes AP, Cluff RM, Webb JC (2009) Analysis of critical permeability, capillary and electrical properties for mesaverde tight gas sandstones from western U.S. Basins. U.S. Department of Energy final technical report for project #DE-FC26-05NT42660, U. S. Department of Energy, p 355. doi:10.2172/971248

  • Carstens H (2005) Buzzard- a discovery based on sound geological thinking. GEO ExPro, p 34–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Chidsey CT Jr, Eby DE (2009) Regional lithofacies trends in the Upper Ismay and Lower Desert Creek zones in the Blanding sub-basin of the Paradox Basin, Utah, the Paradox Basin revisited-new developments in petroleum systems and basin analysis, v. RMAG 2009 Special Publication. Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists, Denver, CO, pp 436–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalson EB, DuChene HR (2009) Deposition of Upper Ismay carbonate mounds, Blanding Sub-basin of the Paradox Basin, Utah. The Paradox Basin revisited-new developments in petroleum systems and basin analysis, RMAG Special Publication. Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists, Denver, CO, pp 471–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg EC (1995) Applied hydrodynamics in petroleum exploration, 2nd edn. Springer Verlag, New York, 295 p

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dolson JC, Steer B, Garing J, Osborne G, Gad A, Amr H (1997) 3D seismic and workstation technology brings technical revolution to the Gulf of Suez Petroleum Company. Lead Edge 16:1809–1817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolson JC, Sisi ZE, Ader J, Leggett B, Sercombe B, Smith D (1998) Use of cuttings, capillary pressure, oil shows and production data to successfully predict a deeper oil water contact, Wata and Matulla Formations, October Field, Gulf of Suez. In: Eloui M (ed) Proceedings of the 14th petroleum conference, vol 1. The Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation, Cairo, Egypt, pp 298–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolson JC, Bahorich MS, Tobin RC, Beaumont EA, Terlikoski LJ, Hendricks ML (1999) Exploring for stratigraphic traps. In Beaumont EA, Foster NH (eds) Exploring for oil and gas traps: treatise of petroleum geology. Handbook of petroleum geology. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Oklahoma pp 21.2–21.68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolson JC, Pemberton SG, Hafizov S, Bratkova V, Volfovich E, Averyanova I (2014) Giant incised vally fill and shoreface ravinement traps, Urna, Ust-Teguss and Tyamkinskoe Field areas, southern West Sibertian Basin, Russia, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Annual Convention, Houston, Texas, Search and Discovery Article #1838534, p 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolson J, Burley SD, Sunder VR, Kothari V, Naidu B, Whiteley NP, Farrimond P, Taylor A, Direen N, Ananthakrishnan B (2015) The discovery of the Barmer Basin, Rajasthan, India, and its petroleum geology. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 99:433–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebanks J, Scheihing NH, Atkinson CD (1992) Flow units for reservoir characterization. In: Morton-Thompson D, Woods AM (eds) Development geology reference manual, vol 10, AAPG methods in exploration series. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, pp 282–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Eby DE, Thomas J, Chidsey C, McClure K, Morgan CD (2003) Heterogeneous shallow-shelf carbonate buildups in the Paradox Basin, Utah and Colorado: targets for increased oil production and reserves using horizontal drilling techniques. Utah Geological Survey, Salt Lake City, UT, p 23

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farrimond P, Naidu BS, Burley SD, Dolson J, Whiteley N, Kothari V (2015) Geochemical characterization of oils and their source rocks in the Barmer Basin, Rajasthan, India. Pet Geosci 21:301–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frye JC, Leonard AB (1952) Pleistocene geology of Kansas (Bulletin 99). State Geological Survey of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 230 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammer GM, Eberli GP, Buchem FSPV, Stevenson GM, Homewood P (1996) Application of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy to evaluate lateral variability in outcrop and subsurface--Desert Creek and Ismay intervals, Paradox Basin. In: Longman MW, Sonnenfeld MD (eds) Paleozoic systems of the Rocky Mountain Regiona. Rocky Mountain Section, SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology), Denver, CO, pp 235–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter GW, Finneran JM, Hartmann DJ, Miller JD (1997) Early determination of reservoir flow units using an integrated petrophysical method. Society of Petroleum Engineers, v. SPE 38679, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafizov S, Dolson JC, Pemberton G, Didenko I, Burova L, Nizyaeva I, Medvedev A (2014) Seismic and core based reservoir characterization of the Giant Priobskoye Field, West Siberia, Russia, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, annual convention, Houston, TX, Search and Discovery Article #1838540, p 31

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall D (2008) Fluid inclusions in petroleum systems. In: Hall D (ed) AAPG getting started Series No. 15. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann DJ, Beaumont EA (1999) Predicting reservoir system quality and performance. In: Beaumont EA, Foster NH (eds) Exploring for oil and gas traps: treatise of petroleum geology, handbook of petroleum geology, vol 1. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, pp 3–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins JM, Luffel DL, Harris TG (1993) Capillary pressure model predicts distance to gas/water, oil/water contact. Oil Gas J: 39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbert MK (1953) Entrapment of petroleum under hydrodynamic conditions. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 37:1954–2026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igoshkin VJ, Dolson JC, Sidorov D, Bakuev O, Herbert R (2008) New Interpretations of the Evolution of the West Siberian Basin, Russia. Implications for exploration, American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Annual conference and exhibition, San Antonio, TX, AAPG Search and Discovery Article #1016, p 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings JB (1987) Capillary pressure techniques: application to exploration and development geology. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 71:1196–1209

    Google Scholar 

  • Littke R, Cramer B, Gerling P, Lopatin NV, Poelchau HS, Schaefer RG, Welte DH (1999) Gas generation and accumulation in the West Siberian Basin. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 83:1642–1665

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure K, Thomas J, Chidsey C, Mitchum RM, Morgan CD, Eby DE (2003) Heterogeneous shallow-shelf carbonate buildups in the Paradox Basin, Utah and Colorado: targets for increased oil production and reserves using horizontal drilling techniques: deliverable 1.1.1. Utah Geological Survey, Salt Lake City, UT, p 44

    Google Scholar 

  • Meckel LD (1995) Chapter 5: Shows. In: Dolson J, Gibson R, Traugott MO (eds) Shows and seals workshop notes (unpublished). Gulf of Suez Petroleum Company (GUPCO)-a subsidiary of Amoco Production Company, Cairo, Egypt

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidu BS, Burley SD, Dolson J, Farrimond P, Sunder VR, Kothari V, Mohapatra P, Whiteley N (2016) Hydrocarbon generation and migration modelling in the Barmer Basin of western Rajasthan, India: lessons for exploration in rift basins with late stage inversion, uplit and tilting. Petroleum system case studies, v. Memoir 112. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan T, Zittel RJ, Beliveveau D, Wheaton S, Warner HR, Woodhouse R, Ananthkirshnan B (2008) Very low water saturations within the sandstones of the Northern Barmer Basin, India, SPE, v. 113162, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan T, Praveer K, Shanley K, Dolson JC, Woodhouse R (2010) Residual hydrocarbons--a trap for the unwary, SPE v. 128013, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor SJ (2000) Hydrocarbon-water interfacial tension values at reservoir conditions. Inconsistencies in the technical literature and the impact on maximum oil and gas column height calculations. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 84:1537–1541

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper A (2007) Fluid properties: density and interfacial tension (IFT)--quantitative impact on petroleum column capacity evaluation in exploration and production (abs.), AAPG Hedberg Conference: basin modeling perspectives: innovative developments and novel applications. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, The Hague, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson JA (1992) Aneth Field--USA. Paradox Basin, Utah. In: Foster NH, Beaumont EA (eds) Stratigraphic traps III. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, pp 41–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Pippin L (1970) Panhandle-Hugoton Field, Texas-Oklahoma-Kansas-The first fifty years. In: Halbouty MT (ed) Geology of giant petroleum fields, Memoir 14. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, pp 204–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittman E (1992) Relationship of porosity and permeability to various parameters derived from mercury injection-capillary pressure curves for sandstone. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 76:191–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Rascoe B (1988) Permian system in western Midcontinent. In Morgan WA, Babcock JA (eds) Permian rocks of the midcontinent: Special Publication 1, Midcontinent SEPM, pp 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray FM, Pinnock SJ, Katamish H, Turnbull JB (2010) The Buzzard field: anatomy of the reservoir from appraisal to production: petroleum geology conference series 2010, pp 369–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins J, Dore G (2005) The Buzzard Field, Outer Moray Firth, Central North Sea, AAPG annual conference and exhibition, Calgary, AB, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Search and Discovery #110016, p 19

    Google Scholar 

  • RPSEA (2009) First ever ROZ (Residual Oil Zone) symposium, Midland, TX, Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America (RPSEA), p 59

    Google Scholar 

  • Schowalter TT (1979) Mechanics of secondary hydrocarbon migration and entrapment. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 63:723–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Schowalter TT, Hess PD (1982) Interpretation of subsurface hydrocarbon shows. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 66:1302–1327

    Google Scholar 

  • Sercombe WJ, Thurmon L, Morse J (2012) Advance reservoir modeling in poor seismic: October Field, northern Gulf of Suez, Egypt. AAPG international conference and exhibition, Milan, Italy, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Search and Discovery Article #40872

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanley KW (2007) Pore-scale to basin-scale impact on gas production from low-permeability sandstones. TNK-BP, Moscow, Turris, p 52

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanley KW, Cluff RM (2015) The evolution of pore-scale fluid-saturation in low-permeability sandstone reservoirs. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 99:1957–1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelton LH (2014) Hugoton’s rich history, AAPG explorer. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, pp 40–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson RP (2003) A dynamic model for the Permian Panhandle and Hugoton Fields, Western Anadarko Basin. 2003 AAPG mid-continent section meeting, Tulsa, OK, AAPG Search and Discovery Article #20015, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson RP (2005) A dynamic model for the Permian Panhandle and Hugoton fields, western Anadarko Basin. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 89:921–938

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson VF (1981) A simple correlation between permeabilities and mercury capillary pressures. J Pet Technol 33:2488–2504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomeer JHM (1960) Introduction of a pore geometrical factor defined by capillary pressure curve. J Pet Technol 12:73–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trudgill BD, Arbuckle WC (2009) Reservoir characterization of clastic cycle sequences in the Paradox Formation of the Hermosa Group, Paradox Basin, Utah. In: U. G. Survey. Utah Geological Survey, Salt Lake City, UT

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavra CL, Kaldi JG, Sneider RM (1992) Geological applications of capillary pressure: a review. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 76:840–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn EW (1921) Note on a method of determining the distribution of pore sizes in a porous material. Proc Natl Acad Sci 7:115–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winland HD (1972) Oil accumulation in response to pore size changes, Wyburn Field, Saskatchewan. Amoco Production Company report F72-G-25 (unpublished), Tulsa, OK, p 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Winland HD (1976) Evaluation of gas slippage and pore aperture size in carbonate and sandstone reservoirs. Amoco Production Company report F76-G-5 (unpublished), Tulsa, OK, p 25

    Google Scholar 

  • Wold JT (1978) Cache field I-II. Four Corners Geological Society, Durango, CO, pp 108–110

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dolson, J. (2016). Quantifying Seals and Saturations: Capillary Pressure, Pseudo-capillary Pressure and Quantitative Show Assessment. In: Understanding Oil and Gas Shows and Seals in the Search for Hydrocarbons. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29710-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29710-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29708-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29710-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics