Skip to main content

Objective Monitoring and the Challenge of Defining Dose/Response Relationships for the Prevention of Chronic Disease

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1097 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Epidemiology and Public Health ((SSEH))

Abstract

The form of the dose/response relationship linking habitual physical activity to major health outcomes is of practical importance for those who are formulating public health recommendations on minimum daily physical activity needs. However, available information on the form of this relationship is conflicting. One might anticipate that the optimal physical activity pattern would mimic that of our hunter-gatherer ancestors. Data gathered on traditional Inuit hunters point to a large daily energy expenditure in many types of hunting; this is accumulated mainly through long days of moderate physical activity. Studies based upon occupational classifications also suggest health benefit from vigorous physical exercise at work, and this view is supported by early questionnaire analyses of leisure behaviour. However, a systematic survey of questionnaire-based reports revealed no clear picture, because of differing methods of measuring and classifying physical activity, substantial inaccuracies in self-reports, and examination of a wide variety of health outcomes. Other studies, using simple measures of fitness as surrogate indicators of accumulated physical activity, have pointed to the largest health benefits being gained from a moderate increment of fitness. Objective physical activity monitors allow a much finer gradation of physical activity patterns, and thus have the potential to clarify dose/response relationships. However, this potential has not as yet been realized. The samples tested have been small, and the health outcomes examined have been physiological changes rather than clinical events. Confidence intervals for the benefits realized at different levels of physical activity have thus been as large or larger than those found in questionnaire studies. Future developments should permit the use of objective monitors on a much larger scale; a 100-fold increase in subject numbers seems likely to overcome current problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shephard RJ. An illustrated history of health and fitness: from prehistory to our postmodern world. New York, NY: Springer; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Godin G, Shephard RJ. Activity patterns of the Canadian eskimo. In: Edholm O, Gunderson G, editors. Human polar biology. Cambridge: Heinemann; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Morris JN, Heady J, Raffle PA, et al. Coronary heart disease and physical activity of work. Lancet. 1953;262:1053–7. 1111–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor HL, Klepetar E, Keys A, et al. Death rates among physically active and sedentary employees of the railroad industry. Am J Publ Health. 1962;52:1697–707.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Paffenbarger RS, Laughlin ME, Gima AS, et al. Work activity of longshoremen as related to death from coronary heart disease and stroke. N Engl J Med. 1970;20:1109–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Paffenbarger R, Hale WE. Work activity and coronary heart mortality. N Engl J Med. 1975;292:545–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blair SN, Cheng Y, Holder JS. Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining health benefits? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33 Suppl 6:S379–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morris JN, Chave SP, Adam C, et al. Vigorous exercise in leisure time and the incidence of coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1973;1(7799):333–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morris JN, Clayton DG, Everitt MG, et al. Exercise in leisure time: coronary attack and death rates. Br Heart J. 1990;63:325–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Paffenbarger R, Hyde RT, Wing AL, et al. Some interrelations of physical activity, physiological fitness, health and longevity. In: Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephens T, editors. Physical activity, fitness and health. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1994. p. 119–33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Linsted KD, Tonstad S, Kuzma JW. Self-report of physical activity and patterns of mortality in Seventh-day Adventist men. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:355–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dorgan JF, Brown C, Barrett M. Physical activity and risk of breast cancer in the Framingham heart study. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;139:662–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Srivastava A, Kreiger N. Relation of physical activity to risk of testicular cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:78–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haapanen N, Miilunpalo SI, Vuori I, et al. The characteristics of leisure time physical activity associated with decreased risk of premature all-cause and CVD-mortality in middle-aged men. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143:870–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haapanen N, Miilunpalo S, Vuori I, et al. Association of leisure time physical activity with the risk of coronary heart disease, hypertension and diabetes in middle aged men and women. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;26:739–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ekelund LG, Haskell WL, Johnson JL, et al. Physical fitness as a predictor of cardiovascular mortality in asymptomatic North American men: the Lipid Research Clinics follow-up study. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1379–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Blair SN, Kohl HW, Paffenbarger RS, et al. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA. 1989;262:2395–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gerdhem P, Dencker M, Ringsberg K, et al. Accelerometer measured daily physical activity among octogenarians: results and associations to other indices of physical performance and bone density. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;102:173–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Daly RM, Ahlborg HG, Ringsberg K, et al. Association between changes in habitual physical activity and changes in bone density, muscle strength, and functional performance in elderly men and women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(12):2252–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shephard RJ. Intensity, duration and frequency of exercise as determinants of the response to a training regime. Int Z Angew Physiol. 1968;26:272–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park H, Togo F, Watanabe E, et al. Relationship of bone health to yearlong physical activity in older Japanese adults: cross-sectional data from the Nakanojo Study. Osteoporosis Int. 2007;18:285–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Aoyagi Y, Park H, Kakiyama T, et al. Year-long physical activity and arterial stiffness in older adults: the Nakanojo Study. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;109(3):455–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Park H, Park S, Shephard RJ, et al. Year-long physical activity and sarcopenia in older adults: the Nakanojo Study. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;109(5):953–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Park S, Park H, Togo F, et al. Yearlong physical activity and metabolic syndrome in older Japanese adults: cross-sectional data from the Nakanojo Study. J Gerontol (Biol Sci Med Sci). 2008;63:1119–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roy J. Shephard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shephard, R.J. (2016). Objective Monitoring and the Challenge of Defining Dose/Response Relationships for the Prevention of Chronic Disease. In: Shephard, R., Tudor-Locke, C. (eds) The Objective Monitoring of Physical Activity: Contributions of Accelerometry to Epidemiology, Exercise Science and Rehabilitation. Springer Series on Epidemiology and Public Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29577-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29577-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29575-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29577-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics