Abstract
Light has a profound impact on the human body. Visually, light determines what aspects of our surroundings we can perceive and interpret. Non-visually, light contributes to regulating our physiology and psychology. Light is thus an unusual medium that can work both in and out of our conscious attention, and with new lighting technology this aspect is falling within our control. Computer controllable solid-state lighting has advanced such that they are now a commonplace technology in the world around us. While many of the characteristics of light-emitting diode (LED) lighting must fulfill the same requirements as lighting in the past, the ability to readily integrate LED technology into digital control systems presents exciting new opportunities that were not possible with other artificial light sources; for example, the potential to integrate the small form factor of an LED into the very fabric of a material or control them remotely over the Internet are aspects that set this technology apart from what has gone before. This unprecedented flexibility presents the opportunity for new functionality and novel interactive solutions for and with light. In this chapter, we present three categories of interactive lighting with many concrete examples: interacting with light at the center of our attention, interacting with light outside our attentional field, and interacting with light in the periphery of our attention. We conclude by considering the factors that make lighting a special medium for peripheral interaction and the role peripheral interaction can play in exposing the many new degrees of freedom ubiquitous digital lighting presents.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Light as we perceive, it is the part of the electromagnetic spectrum in the region of 380–780 nm (Boyce 2014).
References
Aarts, E. H. L., & Marzano, S. (2003). The new everyday: Views on ambient intelligence. 010 Publishers.
Aldrich, M., Badshah, A., Mayton, B., Nan Zhao, & Paradiso, J. A. (2013). Random walk and lighting control. In Sensors, 2013 IEEE (pp. 1–4).
Aliakseyeu, D., Meerbeek, B., Mason, J., Lucero, A., Ozcelebi, T., & Pihlajaniemi, H. (2014). Beyond the switch: Explicit and implicit interaction with light. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (pp. 785–788). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Andersen, O. D., & Sørensen, T. (2014). Exploring in-air gestural interaction with home lighting (Master thesis). Aarhus University.
Antonakaki, T. (2006). Lighting within the social dimension of space: A case study at the royal festival hall. In Proceedings of the Space Syntax and Spatial Cognition Workshop. Bremen.
Arroyo, E., & Selker, T. (2003). Self-adaptive Multimodal-interruption Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 6–11). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Bakker, S., Hoven, E., & Eggen, B. (2015). Peripheral interaction: Characteristics and considerations. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 19(1), 239–254.
Bartindale, T., & Olivier, P. (2013). ThorDMX: A prototyping toolkit for interactive stage lighting control. CHI ’13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3019–3022). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Berson, D. M. D. F. A. T. M. (2002). Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock. Science, 295(5557), 1070–1073.
Boyce, P. R. (2014). Human factors in lighting (3rd Edn). CRC Press/Taylor and Francis: Boca Raton.
Curtis, S. (2014). Gesture controlled lighting using Pebble. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fy94V3iBSiQ
Daemen, E., Flinsenberg, I., Van Loenen, E., Cuppen, R., & Rajae-Joordens, R. (2014). Adaptable healing patient room for stroke patients. Methods of Information in Medicine, 53(5), 406–415. others.
Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Flynn, J. E. (1977). A study of subjective responses to low energy and nonuniform lighting systems. Lighting Design and Application, 7(2), 167–179.
Freeman, E., Brewster, S., & Lantz, V. (2014). Illuminating gesture interfaces with interactive light feedback. In Proceedings of NordiCHI’14 Workshop—Beyond the Switch: Explicit and Implicit Interaction with Light.
Galasiu, A. D., & Veitch, J. A. (2006). Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 38(7), 728–742.
Gibson, J. J. (1978). The ecological approach to the visual perception of pictures. Leonardo, 11(3), 227–235.
Gustafsson, A., & Gyllenswärd, M. (2005). The power-aware cord: Energy awareness through ambient information display. In CHI’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1423–1426). ACM.
Harrison, C., Horstman, J., Hsieh, G., & Hudson, S. (2012). Unlocking the expressivity of point lights. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1683–1692). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Heun, V., von Kapri, A., & Maes, P. (2012). Perifoveal display: Combining foveal and peripheral vision in one visualization. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 1150–1155). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Hoffman, G., Kubat, R., & Breazeal, C. (2008). A hybrid control system for puppeteering a live robotic stage actor. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.
Knez, I. (1995). Effects of indoor lighting on mood and cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 39–51.
Kuznetsov, S., Davis, G. N., Paulos, E., Gross, M. D., & Cheung, J. C. (2011). Red balloon, green balloon, sensors in the sky. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 237–246). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Locken, A., Müller, H., Heuten, W., & Boll, S. (2014). Using light for interactions in a car. In Proceedings of NordiCHI’14 Workshop—Beyond the Switch: Explicit and Implicit Interaction with Light.
Lucero, A., Lashina, T., & Terken, J. (2006). Reducing complexity of interaction with advanced bathroom lighting at home. I-Com, Zeithschrift Für Interaktive Und Kooperative Medien, 5(1), 34–40.
Maan, S., Merkus, B., Ham, J., & Midden, C. (2011). Making it not too obvious: The effect of ambient light feedback on space heating energy consumption. Energy Efficiency, 4(2), 175–183.
Magielse, R. (2014). Designing for adaptive lighting environments. Eindhoven: TU/e.
Magielse, R., Hengeveld, B. J., & Frens, J. (2013). Designing a light controller for a multi-user lighting environment. In Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of the International Association of Societies of Design Research (Vol. 5, pp. 1–12).
Magielse, R., & Offermans, S. (2013). Future lighting systems. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2013 (pp. 2853–2854). ACM Press.
Marks, P. (2014). Blue skies on tap, whenever you need them. New Scientist, 222(2965), 21.
Mason, J., & Engelen, D. (2010). Beyond the switch: Can lighting control provide more than illumination? In Proceedings of Design & Emotion.
McCullough, M. (2013). Ambient commons : attention in the age of embodied information. Cambridge, Massachusetts : The MIT Press.
Meerbeek, B., & Seuntiens, P. (2014). Evaluating the experience of daylight through a virtual skylight. In Experiencing Light 2014.
MĂĽller, H., Fortmann, J., Pielot, M., Hesselmann, T., Poppinga, B., Heuten, W., et al. (2012). Ambix: Designing ambient light information displays. In Proceedings of Designing Interactive Lighting workshop at DIS.
Nass, C., & Brave, S. (2005). Wired for speech: How voice activates and advances the human-computer relationship. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Offenhuber, D., & Seitinger, S. (2014). Over the rainbow: Information design for low-resolution urban displays. In Proceedings of the 2Nd Media Architecture Biennale Conference: World Cities (pp. 40–47). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Offermans, S., van Essen, H., & Eggen, B. (2013). Exploring a hybrid control approach for enhanced user experience of interactive lighting. In Proceedings of the 27th International BCS Human Computer Interaction (pp. 1–9).
Offermans, S., van Essen, H., & Eggen, B. (2014). User interaction with everyday lighting systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(8), 2035–2055.
Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Christen, P., & Georgakopoulos, D. (2014). Context aware computing for the internet of things: A survey. Communications Surveys Tutorials, IEEE, 16(1), 414–454.
Phillips Lighting. (2014). HealWell—White paper (White paper). Eindhoven: Philips Lighting.
Pihlajaniemi, H., Luusua, A., Markkanen, P., Herneoja, A., & Pentikäinen, V. (2014). Experiencing adaptive retail lighting in a real-world pilot. In Experiencing Light 2014. Eindhoven.
Pintus, A. V. (2010). Tangible lightscapes. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 379–380). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92, 11–64.
Poulsen, E. S., Andersen, H. J., Jensen, O. B., Gade, R., Thyrrestrup, T., & Moeslund, T. B. (2012). Controlling urban lighting by human motion patterns results from a full scale experiment. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 339–348). ACM.
Pousman, Z., & Stasko, J. (2006). A taxonomy of ambient information systems: four patterns of design. In A. Celentano (Ed.), AVI ’06 (pp. 67–74). ACM Press.
Rose, D. (2014). Enchanted objects: Design, human desire, and the Internet of things. New York, NY: Scribner.
Ross, P. (2008). Ethics and aesthetics in intelligent product and system design. Eindhoven: TU/e.
Ross, P., & Keyson, D. (2007). The case of sculpting atmospheres: towards design principles for expressive tangible interaction in control of ambient systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(2), 69–79.
Sørensen, T., Andersen, O. D., & Merritt, T. (2015). “Tangible lights”: In-air gestural control of home lighting. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 727–732). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Taylor, L. H., & Socov, E. W. (1974). Movement of people towards light. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 3, 237–241.
Tomitsch, M., Kappel, K., Lehner, A., & Grechenig, T. (2007). Towards a taxonomy for ambient information systems. In Pervasive 2007 Workshop on the Issues of Designing and Evaluating G Ambient Information Systems (pp. 42–47).
van Essen, H., Offermans, S., & Eggen, B. (2012). Exploring the role of autonomous system behavior in lighting control. In Proceedings of DIS’12 Workshop—Designing Interactive Lighting.
Vogels, I. (2008). Atmosphere metrics. Probing Experience; Philips Research, 8, 25–41.
Weiser, M., & Brown, J. S. (1997). The coming age of calm technology. In P. J. Denning & R. M. Metcalfe (Eds.), Beyond calculation (pp. 75–85). New York, NY, USA: Copernicus.
Werth, L., Steidle, A., & Hanke, E. (2012). Getting close in the dark: Darkness increases cooperation. Proceedings of Experiencing Light.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all their colleagues in Philips Research and Philips Lighting who contributed to this paper. Specifically, we would like to thank Debora Almeida and Stephanie Cohn.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aliakseyeu, D., Meerbeek, B., Mason, J., Magielse, R., Seitinger, S. (2016). Peripheral Interaction with Light. In: Bakker, S., Hausen, D., Selker, T. (eds) Peripheral Interaction. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29523-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29523-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29521-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29523-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)