Abstract
In this chapter, we briefly compare our approach of a fault-tolerant operating system with existing approaches. We use our own definition of fault tolerance as a process that is required to support implementation of all steps of GAFT.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Green Hills Software (2008) Integrity, the most advanced RTOS technology. Technical report, Green Hills Software, vol 61
Klein G et al (2009) seL4: formal verification of an os kernel. Technical report
Dirk Vogt D, Do ̈bel B, Lackorzynski A (2010) Stay strong, stay safe: enhancing reliability of a secure operating system. In: Proceedings of the workshop on isolation and integration for dependable systems (IIDS), Paris, France, April 2010. ACM, New York
Lackorzynski A, Warg A (2009). Taming subsystems: capabilities as universal resource access control in L4. In: Proceedings of the second workshop on isolation and integration in embedded systems, IIES’09. ACM, New York, pp 25–30
Tanenbaum A (2006) Reorganizing Unix for reliability. In: Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific, pp 81–94
David F et al (2008) Curios: improving reliability through operating system structure. OSDI’08, pp 59–72, Berkeley, CA, USENIX Association
Shapiro J (1999) EROS: a capability system. Ph.D thesis, University of Pennsylvania
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schagaev, I., Kaegi-Trachsel, T. (2016). Proposed Run-Time System Versus Existing Approaches. In: Software Design for Resilient Computer Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29465-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29465-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29463-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29465-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)