Skip to main content

Sunscreen Formulation: Optimizing Efficacy of UVB and UVA Protection

Abstract

Protection provided by sunscreen products has improved dramatically since the early days of availability of commercial products in the 1950s and 1960s. Early products focused primarily on protection against short-wave ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation from sunlight, the primary source of sunburn. With more recent emphasis on adding ultraviolet A (UVA) protection to sunscreens and availability of UV filters capable of blocking far into the long wavelength UVA region, sunscreen protection has truly become “broad spectrum,” and the sun protection factors (SPFs) have dramatically increased. Achieving broad-spectrum protection that is also high in the level of protection is achieved by careful choice of UV filters with supportive vehicles that allow these filters to work to their optimal levels of efficiency.

Keywords

  • Zinc Oxide
  • Action Spectrum
  • Minimal Erythema Dose
  • Critical Wavelength
  • Sunscreen Product

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Urbach F (2001) The historical aspects of sunscreens. J Photochem Photobiol 64(2–3):99–104

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roelandts R (2009) History of photoprotection. In: Lim H, Draelos Z (eds) Clinical guide to sunscreens and photoprotection. Informa Healthcare, New York, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cole C (2009) Formulation and stability of sunscreen products. In: Lim H, Draelos Z (eds) Clinical guide to sunscreens and photoprotection. Informa Healthcare, New York, pp 39–51

    Google Scholar 

  4. Food and Drug Administration, USA (1978) Sunscreen drug products for over the counter use: proposed safety, effectiveness and labeling conditions. Fed Reg 43(166):38206–38269

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cole C, Forbes P, Davies R (1986) An action spectrum for UV photocarcinogenesis. Photochem Photobiol 43:275–284

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Gruijl FR, Sterenborg HJ, Forbes PD, Davies RE, Cole C, Kelfkens G, van Weelden H, Slaper H, van der Leun JC (1993) Wavelength dependence of skin cancer induction by ultraviolet irradiation of albino hairless mice. Cancer Res 53:53–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Gruijl FR (2002) Photocarcinogenesis: UVA vs UVB radiation. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 15:316–320

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Staberg B, Wulf HC, Klemp P, Brodthagen H (1983) The carcinogenic effect of UVA irradiation. J Invest Dermatol 81:517–519

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bestak R, Halliday G (1996) Chronic low-dose UVA irradiation induces local suppression of contact hypersensitivity, Langerhans cell depletion and suppressor cell activation in C3H/HeJ mice. Photochem Photobiol 64:969–974

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bestak R, Barnetson R, Nearm M, Halliday G (1995) Sunscreen protection of contact hypersensitivity responses from chronic solar-simulated ultraviolet irradiation correlates with the absorption spectrum of the sunscreen. J Invest Dermatol 105:345–351

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Iwai I et al (1999) UVA-induced immune suppression through an oxidative pathway. J Invest Dermatol 112:19–24

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kligman LH, Sayre RM (1991) An action spectrum for ultraviolet induced elastosis in hairless mice: quantification of elastosis by image analysis. Photochem Photobiol 53:237–242

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bissett D et al (1987) An animal model of solar-aged skin: histological, physical, and visible changes in UV irradiated hairless mouse skin. Photochem Photobiol 46(3):367–378

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McKinley A, Deffey BL (1987) “A reference action spectrum for ultraviolet induced Erythema in human skin”. In: Passchier WF, Bosnajakovic BFM (eds) Humen exposure to ultraviolet radiaton: risks and regulations, International congress series. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 83–87

    Google Scholar 

  15. Setlow R (1974) The wavelengths in sunlight effective in producing skin cancer: a theoretical analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 71(9):3363–3366

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bernhard G, Mayer B, Seckmeyer G (1997) Measurements of spectral solar UV irradiance in tropical-Australia. J Geophys Res 102(D7):8719–8730

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. ASTM G173-03(2012) Standard tables for reference solar spectral irradiances: Direct Normal and Hemispherical on 37° Tilted Surface. Book of Standards 14.04 2012

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cole CA (2001) Measurement of sunscreen UVA protectiveness. Review article. Photomedicine Photoallergy Photodermatology 17(1):2–10

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Green A et al (1996) Skin cancer in a subtropical Australian population: incidence and lack of association with occupation. AM J Epidemiol 144(11):1034–1040

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moan J, Dahlback A, Setlow RB (1999) Epidemiological support for a hypothesis for melanoma induction indicating a role for UVA radiation. Photochem Photobiol 70:243–247

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. DeFabo E (2006) Initial studies on an in vivo action spectrum for melanoma induction. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 92(1):97–104

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. De Fabo EC, Noonan FP, Fears T, Merlino G (2004) Ultraviolet B but not ultraviolet a radiation initiates melanoma. Cancer Res 64:6372–6376

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ullrich SE, Nghiem DX, Khaskina P (2007) Suppression of an established immune response by UVA: a critical role for mast cells. Photochem Photobiol 83(5):1095–1100

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Damian DL, Matthews YJ, Phan TA, Halliday GM (2011) An action spectrum for ultraviolet radiation-induced immunosuppression in humans. Br J Dermatol 163(3):657–659

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moyal D, Fourtanier A (2002) Effects of UVA radiation on an established immune response in humans and sunscreen efficacy. Exp Dermatol 11(S1):28–32

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ngheim DX, Kazimi N, Clydesdale G, Ananthaswamy HN, Kripke ML, Ullrich SE (2001) Ultraviolet a radiation suppresses an established immune response: implications for sunscreen design. J Invest Dermatol 117:1193–1199

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  27. Diffey BL, Tanner PR, Matts PJ, Nash JF (2000) In vitro assessment of the broad-spectrum ultraviolet protection of sunscreen products. J Am Acad Dermatol 43(6):1024–1035

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cole C (2001) Sunscreen protection in the ultraviolet a region: how to measure effectiveness. Photoderm Photoimmunol Photomed 17:2–10

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gange R, Soparkar A, Matzinger B, Dromgoole S, Sefton J, DeGryse R (1986) Efficacy of a sunscreen containing butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane against ultraviolet a radiation in photosensitized subjects. J Am Acad Dermatol 15:494–499

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lowe N, Dromgoole S, Sefton JH, Bourget T, Weingarten D (1987) Indoor and outdoor efficacy testing of a broad spectrum sunscreen against ultraviolet a radiation in psoralen sensitized subjects. J Am Acad Dermatol 17:224–230

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kollias N, Bykowski J (1999) Immediate pigment darkening thresholds of human skin to monochromatic (362 nm) ultraviolet a radiation are fluence rate dependent. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 15:175–178

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fourtanier A, Moyal D, Maccario J, Compan D, Wolf P, Quehenberger F, Cooper K, Baron E, Halliday G, Poon T, Seed P, Walker SL, Young AR (2005) Measurement of sunscreen immune protection factors in humans: a consensus paper. J Invest Dermatol 125(3):403–409

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Young AR (2004) Methods used to evaluate the immune protection factor of sunscreen: advantages and disadvantages of different in vivo techniques. Cutis 74(5 Suppl):19–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Standfield J, Feldt P, Csortan E, Krochmal L (1989) Ultraviolet a sunscreen evaluations in normal subjects. J Am Acad Dermatol 20:744–778

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  35. Cole C, Van Fossen R (1992) Measurement of sunscreen UVA protection; an unsensitized human model. J Am Acad Dermatol 26:178–184

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cole C (1994) Multicenter evaluation of sunscreen UVA protectiveness with the protection factor test method. J Am Acad Dermatol 30:729–736

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chardon A, Moyal D, Hourseau C (1997) Persistent pigment darkening response for evaluation of ultraviolet a protection assays. In: Lowe N, Shaath N, Pathak M (eds) Sunscreens: development, evaluation and regulatory aspects. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 582–559

    Google Scholar 

  38. Japan Cosmetic Industry Association (JCIA) technical bulletin. Measurement standard for UVA protection efficacy, Issued 21 Nov 1995 as effective as of 1 Jan 1996. (The European Cosmetic Toiletry and Parfumery Association)

    Google Scholar 

  39. COLIPA In Vitro Photo Protection Methods Task Force (2007) Method for the in vitro determination of UVA protection provided by sunscreen products. Guideline 2007, 2nd edn. COLIPA, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  40. ISO 244432012 (2012) Test method: cosmetics-sun protection test method – determination of sunscreen UVA photoprotection in vitro

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fourtanier A, Moyal D, Selte S (2008) Sunscreens containing the broad-spectrum absorber, Mexoryl SX, prevent the cutaneous detrimental effects of UV exposure; a review of clinical study results. Photoderm Photoimmun Photomed 24(4):164–174

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Refregier JL (2004) Relationship between UVA protection and skin response to UV light: proposal for labeling UVA protection. Int J Cosmet Sci 26:197–206

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  43. Tarras-Wahlberg N, Stenhagen G, Larkö O, Rosén A, Wennberg A, Wennerström O (1999) Changes in ultraviolet absorption of sunscreens after ultraviolet irradiation. J Invest Dermatol 113:547–553

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sayre MR, Dowdy JC, Gerwig AJ, Williams WJ, Lloyd RV (2005) Unexpected photolysis of the sunscreen octinoxate in the presence of the sunscreen avobenzone. Photochem Photobiol 81(2):452–456

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Federal Register, 21 CFR Parts 201 and 301 (2011) Labeling and effectiveness testing: sunscreen drug products for over-the-counter human use. 76(117):35623

    Google Scholar 

  46. Federal register, 21 CFR Parts 201 and 301 (2007). Sunscreen products for over-the-counter human use: propose amendment of final monograph. 72(165):49075

    Google Scholar 

  47. Chatelain E, Gabard B (2001) Photostabilization of butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (avobenzone) and ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate by Bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine (tinosorb S), a New UV broadband filter. Photochem Photobiol 74(3):401–406

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Anderson MW, Hewitt JP, Spruce SR (1997) Broad-spectrum physical sunscreens: titanium dioxide and zinc oxide. In: Lowe N, Shaath N, Pathak M (eds) Sunscreens: development, evaluation, and regulatory aspects, 2nd edn. Marcel Decker, New York, pp 353–396

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hewitt J (2013) Formulating with nano technologies in skincare: opportunities and challenges. In: Nasir A (ed) Nanotechnology in medicine. Springer Science and Business Media LLC, New York, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  50. Osterwalder U, Champ C, Flösser-Müller H, Herzog B (2013) The evoluation of UVA protection. www.skin-care-forum.basf.com. Sept 2013

  51. Diffey BL, Brown MW (2012) The ideal spectral profile of topical sunscreens. Photochem Photobiol 88(3):744–747

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Curtis Cole PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cole, C. (2016). Sunscreen Formulation: Optimizing Efficacy of UVB and UVA Protection. In: Wang, S., Lim, H. (eds) Principles and Practice of Photoprotection. Adis, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29382-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29382-0_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Adis, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29381-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29382-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)