Skip to main content

Lunar Labor Relations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dissent, Revolution and Liberty Beyond Earth

Part of the book series: Space and Society ((SPSO))

Abstract

This chapter defends the claim that at least some essential service strikes will be morally permissible in lunar societies. I argue by analogy with essential service strikes in medicine. The duty to provide medical care is not borne exclusively by nurses and physicians but rather is borne by a wider healthcare community, which includes hospital administrators, insurance companies, etc. If it is permissible for hospital administrators and insurance companies to compete for their interests by making decisions which might negatively affect patient care, then nurses and physicians should have at least a limited right to bargain for their interests (and the interests of their patients), which should include, in extreme circumstances, a right to withhold their labor. Similarly, lunar essential service workers, such as low-level employees in the air production industry, ought to retain the right to strike . The duty to provide breathable air is borne by a large “air production” community that includes air production staff, administrators, and corporations, as well as regulators and the voting public. If other members of this community were to make decisions which resulted in especially egregious working conditions for air production staff, then these employees would have the right to strike to improve their working conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It should be noted that Braithwaite’s point is presented as an objection to physician strikes—based on the potential for physicians to misclassify essential care as non-essential care.

  2. 2.

    For similar positions, see Brecher (1985) and Grosskopf et al. (1985).

  3. 3.

    For more discussion, especially concerning the purported special status of nurses and physicians, see MacDougall (2013).

  4. 4.

    These are conditions imposed by all authors who support (in-principle) nurse and physician strikes. See, e.g., Chadwick and Thompson (2000), Daniels (1978), Muyskens (1982), and Veatch and Bleich (1975).

  5. 5.

    I have intentionally omitted a further condition stipulating that the strike is only justifiable if it is successful. Strikers cannot plausibly predict the extent to which other members of the community will concede to their demands. Nonetheless if there are compelling reasons for believing that the strike will end in failure (because the demands could not possibly be met), then it would be much more difficult to justify the strike, as any harm caused during would not lead to improvements post-strike.

  6. 6.

    Thanks to Kelly Smith for bringing these issues to my attention.

  7. 7.

    For more on the application of Rawlsian deliberation to space, see Schwartz (2015) and Milligan (2015).

  8. 8.

    We might not be able to say the same concerning other positions in the air industry, for instance those tasked with monitoring or maintaining the air supply systems.

  9. 9.

    Though of course the topic has been broached in science fiction, e.g., Robert Heinlein’s The Moon is a Harsh Mistress and Misfit; Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle’s Spirals, as well as Allen Steele's Rude Astronauts series. Also worth mentioning is the Babylon 5 episode “By Any Means Necessary” (Season 1, episode 12), in which the main plot concerns Commander Sinclair’s response to a dock workers’ strike. I thank Stephen Baxter for literature suggestions.

  10. 10.

    Though it should be acknowledged that hazardous working conditions tend to be linked causally to service disruptions, so it might be that whenever the first condition holds the second holds (or is likely to hold) as well.

References

  • Braithwaite, S. (2000). Collective actions by physicians that do not endanger patients. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 9, 470–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, R. (1985). Striking responsibilities. Journal of Medical Ethics, 11, 66–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, R., & Thompson, A. (2000). Professional ethics and labor disputes: medicine and nursing in the United Kingdom. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 9, 483–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockell, C. (2013). Extra-Terrestrial Liberty: An enquiry into the nature and causes of tyrannical government beyond the earth. Edinburgh: Shoving Leopard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. (1978). On the picket line: Are doctor’s strikes ethical? Hastings Center Report, 8, 24–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, G. (1977). Strikes and the national health service: some legal and ethical issues. Journal of Medical Ethics, 3, 76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf, I., Buckman, G., & Garty, M. (1985). Ethical dilemmas of the doctor’s strike in Israel. Journal of Medical Ethics, 11, 70–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall, D. R. (2013). Physicians’ strikes and the competing bases of physicians’ moral obligations. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 23, 249–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, T. (2015). Rawlsian deliberation about space settlement. In C. Cockell (ed.), Human governance beyond earth: Implications for freedom (pp. 9–22). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, C. (2014). Essential services, worker’s freedom, and distributive justice. Social Theory and Practice, 40, 649–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muyskens, J. (1982). Nurses’ collective responsibility and the strike weapon. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 7, 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neiman, P. (2011). Nursing strikes: An ethical perspective on the US healthcare community. Nursing Ethics, 18, 596–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Railton, P. (1980). Health care personnel and the right to strike: A social perspective. In Marc Basson (Ed.), Ethics, humanism, and medicine: Proceedings of three conferences sponsored by the committee on ethics, humanism, and medicine at the university of Michigan, 1978–1979 (pp. 291–302). New York: Alan R. Liss Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. (2015). Fairness as a moral grounding for space policy. In C. Cockell (ed) The meaning of liberty beyond earth, (pp. 69–89). Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, R., & Bleich, D. (1975). Interns and residents on strike. Hastings Center Report, 5, 7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, M. (2000). The right to strike in essential services under United States labor law. In P. K. Villalobos (ed.), Relaciones Laborales en el Siglo XXI (pp. 95–196). Instituto de Investigaciones Juridicas de la UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, F. (1988). Labor relations in space: An essay in extraterrestrial business ethics. The Monist, 71, 114–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James S. J. Schwartz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schwartz, J.S.J. (2016). Lunar Labor Relations. In: Cockell, C. (eds) Dissent, Revolution and Liberty Beyond Earth. Space and Society. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29349-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics