The Interface Between the Trade Rules and Climate Change Actions

Chapter

Abstract

In the present day scenario, national and international policies are being developed to tackle the issue of climate change. This chapter discusses the relevant WTO rules and their interaction with different type of trade related Greenhouse Gas policies and regulations adopted nationally and internationally to mitigate climate change.

References

  1. Baron R et al (2007) Sectoral Approaches to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation - Exploring Issues for Heavy Industry. IEA Information Paper, IEA/OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. Charnovitz S (2000) The supervision of health and biosafety regulation by world trade rules. Tulane Environ Law J 13:271–302Google Scholar
  3. Charnovitz S (2002) The law of environmental “PPMs” in the WTO: debunking the myth of illegality. Yale J Int Law 27(59):59–110Google Scholar
  4. Condon B (2009) Climate change and unresolved issues in WTO law. J Int Econ Law 12(4):896–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conrad C (2011) Processes and Production Methods (PPMs) in WTO law: interfacing trade and social goods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaines S (2002) Processes and production methods: how to produce sound policy for environmental PPM-based trade measures. Columbia J Environ Law 27(2)Google Scholar
  7. Holzer K (2014) Carbon-related border adjustment and WTO law. Edward Elgar Publishing LtdGoogle Scholar
  8. Howse R, Regan D (2000) The product/process distinction: an illusory basis for disciplining ‘Unilateralism’ in trade policy. Eur J Int Law 11(2):249–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hudec R (2000) The product-process doctrine in GATT/WTO jurisprudence. In: Bronckers J, Jackson J, Quick R (eds) New directions in international economic law: essays in honour of John H. Jackson. Kluwer Law International, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Hudec R (2003) GATT/WTO constraints on national regulation: Requiem for an ‘Aims and Effects’ test. Int Lawyer 32:619–649Google Scholar
  11. General Agreement on Trade in Services (1995) https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/26-gats_01_e.htm. Accessed 20 July 2015
  12. Marceau G (2013) The new TBT jurisprudence in US-Clove Cigarettes, WTO US-Tuna II, and US – COOL. Asian J WTO Int Health Law Policy 8(1):1–36Google Scholar
  13. Marceau G (2014) More about the TBT Agreement in the AB Report in EC – Seal Products. RECIEL (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  14. Marceau G, Wyatt J (2013) The WTO’s efforts to balance economic development and environmental protection: a short review of appellate body jurisprudence. Latin Am J Int Trade Law 1(1):291–314Google Scholar
  15. Marceau G, Low P, Reinaud J (2011) The Interface Between the Trade and Climate Regimes: Scoping the Issues. Staff Working Paper, ERSD-2011-1Google Scholar
  16. Pauwelyn J (2007) U.S. Federal Climate Change Policy and Competitiveness Concerns: The Limits and Options of International Trade Law. Working Paper, NI WP 07-02 Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University. http://nicholas.duke.edu/institute/internationaltradelaw.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2010
  17. Read R (2011) Process and production methods and the regulation of international trade. In: Perdikis N, Read R (eds) The WTO and the regulation of international trade: recent trade disputes between the European Union and the United States. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (1987) United States – Taxes on Petroleum and Certain Imported Substances (“US-Superfund”). Report of the Panel, L/6175-34S/136, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  19. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (1991) United States – Restrictions on the Imports of Tuna (Tuna Dolphin I). Report of the Panel, DS21/R - 39S/155, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  20. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (1994) United States – Restrictions on Imports of Tuna (Tuna Dolphin II). Report of the Panel, DS29/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  21. Vranes E (2009) Climate change and the WTO: EU emission trading and the WTO disciplines on trade in goods, services and investment protection. J World Trade 43(4)Google Scholar
  22. Wiers J (2001) WTO rules and environmental production and processing methods (PPMs). ERA Forum 4:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. World Trade Organization (1996a) Japan—Alcoholic Beverages II. Appellate Body Report, WT/DS8/AB/R; WT/DS10/AB/R; WT/DS11/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  24. World Trade Organization (1996b) United States—Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline (US-Gasoline). Appellate Body Report, WT/DS2/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  25. World Trade Organization (1997) India—Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Chemical Products (‘India-Patents’). Appellate Body Report, WT/DS50/AB/RGoogle Scholar
  26. World Trade Organization (1998) United States—Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (‘US-Shrimp’). Appellate Body Report, WT/DS58/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  27. World Trade Organization (1999) Korea—Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Some Dairy Products Dairy (Korea—Dairy). Appellate Body Report, WT/DS98/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  28. World Trade Organization (2000a) Argentina—Safeguard Measures on Imports of Footwear (“Argentina—Footwear (EC)”). Appellate Body Report, WT/DS121/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  29. World Trade Organization (2000b) Korea - Measures Affecting Imports of Fresh, Chilled and Frozen Beef. Appellate Body Report, WT/DS161/AB/R; WT/DS169/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  30. World Trade Organization (2001) European Communities – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products (‘EC-Asbestos’). Appellate Body Report, WT/DS135/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  31. World Trade Organization (2004) European Communities – Conditions for the Granting of Tariff Preferences to Developing Countries (“EC-Tariffs”). Appellate Body Report, WT/DS246/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  32. World Trade Organization (2005a) Dominican Republic - Measures Affecting the Importation and Internal Sale of Cigarettes (‘Dominican Republic-Cigarettes’). Appellate Body Report, WT/DS302/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  33. World Trade Organization (2005b) United States – Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Better Services (‘US- Gambling’). Appellate Body Report, WT/DS285/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  34. World Trade Organization (2007) Brazil – Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres (“Brazil-Tyres”). Appellate Body Report, WT/DS332/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  35. World Trade Organization (2008) China-Measures Affecting Imports of Automobiles (“China-Automobiles”). Appellate Body Report, WT/DS339/AB/R; WT/DS340/AB/R; WT/DS342/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  36. World Trade Organization (2009) China – Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Entertainment Products (‘China - Audiovisual Services’). Appellate Body Report, WT/DS363/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  37. World Trade Organization (2012a) China – Measures Related to the Exportation of Various Raw Materials (‘China - Raw Materials’). Appellate Body Report, WT/DS394/AB/R; WT/DS395/AB/R; WT/DS398/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  38. World Trade Organization (2012b) United States – Certain Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) Requirements (US-COOL). Appellate Body Report, WT/DS384/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  39. World Trade Organization (2012c) United States – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes, (‘US – Clove Cigarettes’). Appellate Body Report, WT/DS406/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  40. World Trade Organization (2012d) United States - Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products (US-Tuna II (Mexico)). Appellate Body Report, WT/DS381/AB/R, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  41. World Trade Organization (2014) European Communities – Measures Prohibiting the Importation and Marketing of Seal Products. Appellate Body Report, WT/DS400/AB/R; WT/DS401/AB/R, ‘EC-Seal Products’, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  42. World Trade Organization, United Nations Environment Programme (2009) Trade and Climate Change: WTO-UNEP Report, World Trade Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  2. 2.The Legal Affairs Division of the WTOGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations