Abstract
In the previous chapter, we argued that an ethical community should be held accountable through disruptive speech acts that can address the community’s ethical concerns. Implicit in such an argument is the profound responsibility afforded human beings in ensuring their conduct not only in relation to themselves, but also in relation to others, as constituted through communities. And yet, there is another responsibility, embodied in the conceptualisation of vicegerency; that is, as a trustee of Allah on earth (khalīfatullāh fī al-‘ard). Embedded in these two responsibilities—one to the social and the other to the Creator—is the duality of humankind. On the one hand, human beings are considered in relation to their corporeal existence. On the other hand, because of the responsibility as khalīfatullāh fī al-‘ard, humankind and their actions cannot be limited to the physical spheres of their world. Hence, the corporeal dimension of what it means to be human must be considered in relation to the incorporeal or metaphysical scope of what it means to act as a trustee of Allah on earth. In this chapter, we look at how the Qurān conceives of being human and what distinguishes humankind from other forms of existence. We explore what is commonly considered the duality of humankind, that is, as being simultaneously physical and spiritual, or secular and transcendent. And, while it is argued that even though humans, in terms of Qurānic exegeses, are both mortal (as a physical body) and immortal (as resurrection), the corporeality and transcendence of humankind can be realised through an ethical enactment of what it means to be human—that is, to be just to oneself and to others because of, and in response to, the enactment of khalīfatullāh fī al-‘ard. Such an argument considers that inasmuch as humankind needs Allah—in terms of surrendering to an innate state of surrendering to his will—humankind needs others to be human, so that the act of vicegerency or khalīfatullāh fī al-ard might be fulfilled.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akhtar, S. (2008). The Quran and the secular mind. New York: Routledge.
Albayrak, A. (2006). Insan/Nas. In O. Leaman (Ed.), The Qur’an: An encyclopedia (pp. 300–303). London: Routledge.
Alibasic, A. (1999). The right of political opposition in Islamic history and legal theory: An exploration of an ambivalent heritage. Al-Shajarah: Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilisation, 4(2), 231–296.
Cavell, S. (1979). The claim of reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kamali, H. (1997). Freedom of expression in Islam. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society.
Rahman, F. (2009). Major themes of the Qur’ān (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Siddiqui, M. (2011). Being human in Islam. In M. Ipgrave & D. Marshall (Eds.), Humanity texts and contexts: Christian and Muslim perspectives (pp. 15–21). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davids, N., Waghid, Y. (2016). Qurānic Conceptions of Being Human. In: Ethical Dimensions of Muslim Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29317-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29317-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29316-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29317-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)