Advertisement

Disentangling Gender and Ethnicity in Ethnic Intermarriage

Chapter
  • 172 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life book series (PSFL)

Abstract

This chapter develops a theoretical framework that guides the analysis and presentation of data. It addresses the relevance of ethnicity and gender in the study of ethnic intermarriage in view of macro-social trends such as individualisation and globalisation. The use of ethnicity and gender as tools in the analysis of everyday social life is first accessed. The chapter then provides a critical review of existing theories of intersectionality, explaining the need to acknowledge the mutually constituent and mutually shaping relations between gender and ethnicity in intermarriage. Highlighting the interplay between locality and temporality, the life-story model of identity is introduced as a theoretically plausible and empirically feasible framework for disentangling the intersectionality between gender and ethnic identities in distinct types of Chinese-British families.

Keywords

Social Identity Ethnic Identity Social Category Life Story Multiple Identity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aspinall, P., & Song, M. (2013). Mixed race identities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banton, M. (2011). A theory of social categories. Sociology, 45(2), 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barth, F. (1998). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Illinois: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beauvoir, S. (2010 [1949]). The second sex. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  7. Berger, P. L., Berger, B., & Kellner, H. (1974). The homeless mind: Modernization and consciousness. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  8. Berry, J. W. (2008). Globalisation and acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(4), 328–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beutel, A. M., & Axinn, W. G. (2002). Gender, social change, and educational attainment. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 51(1), 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blossfeld, H. P., & Hofmeister, H. A. (2006). Globalization, uncertainty and women’s careers: An international comparison. London: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society, 14(6), 723–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bradley, H. (1996). Fractured identities: Changing patterns of inequality. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  15. Bradley, H., & Healy, G. (2008). Ethnicity and gender at work: Inequalities, careers and employment relations: Identity, careers and employment relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Browne, I., & Misra, J. (2003). The intersection of gender and race in the labor market. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 487–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Browne, I., & Misra, J. (2007). Labor-market inequality: Intersections of gender, race, and class. In I. Romero & E. Ericrgolis (Eds.), The blackwell companion to social inequalities (pp. 165–189). London: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brubaker, R. (2004). Ethnicity without groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brubaker, R. (2014). Beyond ethnicity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(5), 804–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bruner, S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2003). The age of migration. London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. Charsley, K. (2013). Transnational marriage: New perspectives from Europe and beyond. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Cheung, C.-K., & Kwan, A. Y.-H. (2009). The erosion of filial piety by modernisation in Chinese cities. Ageing and Society, 29(02), 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Collins, P. H. (1998). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia, 13(3), 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cooley, C. H. (1992). Human nature and the social order. London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–167.Google Scholar
  29. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cresswell, M. J. (2010). Semantic indexicality. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Doyle, J. M., & Kao, G. (2007). Are racial identities of multiracials stable? Changing self-identification among single and multiple race individuals. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(4), 405–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Donato, K. M., Gabaccia, D., Holdaway, J., Manalansan, M., & Pessar, P. R. (2006). A glass half full? Gender in migration studies. International Migration Review, 40(1), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Durkheim, É. (1997 [1893]). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Elder, G. H., & Giele, J. Z. (2009). The craft of life course research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  36. Epstein, C. F. (1990). Deceptive distinctions: Sex, gender, and the social order. New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. London: Norton.Google Scholar
  38. Ervin, L. H., & Stryker, S. (2001). Theorizing the relationship between self-esteem and identity. In T. Owens, S. Stryker, & N. Goodman (Eds.), Extending self-esteem theory and research: Sociological and psychological currents (pp. 29–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  40. Fenstermaker, S., & West, C. (2013). Doing gender, doing difference: Inequality, power, and institutional change. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Fenton, S. (2010). Ethnicity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  42. Ferree, M. M., Lorber, J., & Hess, B. B. (Eds.) (1999). Revisioning gender. Oxford: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar
  43. Fischer, M. (1986). Ethnicity and the postmodern arts of memory. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 194–210). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  45. Foucault, M. (2012). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  46. Freese, L., & Burke, P. J. (1994). Persons, identities, and social interaction. Advances in Group Processes, 11, 1–24.Google Scholar
  47. Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  48. Fuchs, T. (2007). Fragmented selves: Temporality and identity in borderline personality disorder. Psychopathology, 40(6), 379–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  50. Giddens, A. (1987). Social theory and modern sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  52. Giele, J. Z., & Elder, G. H. (1998). Methods of life course research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  54. Gonzalez, A., Houston, M., & Chen, V. (2000). Our voices: Essays in culture, ethnicity, and communication. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  55. Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Goode, W. J. (1970). World revolution and family patterns. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  57. Gordon, M. M. (1964). Assimilation in American life: The role of race, religion, and national origins. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Gupta, M. D. (1997). “What is Indian about you?” A gendered, transnational approach to ethnicity. Gender and Society, 11(5), 572–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hall, S. (1987). Minimal selves. In H. K. Bhabha & L. Appignanesi (Eds.), Identity: The real me (pp. 44–46). London: Institute of Contemporary Arts.Google Scholar
  60. Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 222–237). London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  61. Hall, S. (1992). The West and the rest: Discourse and power. In S. Hall & B. Gieben (Eds.), Formations of modernity (pp. 185–224). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  62. Hancock, A.-M. (2007). When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(01), 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Herman, D., Jahn, M., & Ryan, M.-L. (2010). Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Herrera, G. (2013). Gender and international migration: Contributions and cross-fertilizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 39(1), 471–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hirschfeld, L. A. (1998). Race in the making: Cognition, culture, and the child’s construction of human kinds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  66. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  67. Holliday, A., Hyde, M., & Kullman, J. (2010). Intercultural communication: An advanced resource book for students. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Hu, Y., & Scott, J. (2014). Family and gender values in China: Generational, geographic, and gender differences. Journal of Family Issues. doi: 10.1177/0192513X14528710.Google Scholar
  69. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Iwai, N., & Yasuda, T. (2009). Family values in East Asia: A comparison among Japan, South Korea, China, and Taiwan based on East Asian Social Survey 2006. Kyoto, Japan: Nakanishiya Shuppan.Google Scholar
  72. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Jamieson, L., & Simpson, R. (2013). Living alone: Globalization, identity and belonging. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Khanna, N. (2011). Ethnicity and race as “symbolic”: The use of ethnic and racial symbols in asserting a biracial identity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(6), 1049–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kurien, P. (1999). Gendered ethnicity creating a Hindu Indian identity in the United States. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(4), 648–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lawler, S. (2002). Mothering the self: Mothers, daughters, subjects. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. Lewis, J. (2001). The end of marriage?: Individualism and intimate relations. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  78. McAdams, D. P. (1988). Power, intimacy, and the life story: Personological inquiries into identity. London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  79. McAdams, D. P. (1990). Unity and purpose in human lives: The emergence of identity as a life story. In A. I. Rabin, R. A. Zucker, R. A. Emmons, & S. Frank (Eds.), Studying persons and lives (pp. 148–200). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  80. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5(2), 100–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interactions: An examination of human associations in everyday life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  82. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  84. Mehrotra, M., & Calasanti, T. M. (2010). The family as a site for gendered ethnic identity work among Asian Indian immigrants. Journal of Family Issues, 31(6), 778–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Muttarak, R., & Heath, A. (2010). Who intermarries in Britain? Explaining ethnic diversity in intermarriage patterns. The British Journal of Sociology, 61(2), 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Nagel, J. (2003). Race, ethnicity, and sexuality: Intimate intersections, forbidden frontiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Oakley, A. (1985). Sex, gender and society. London: Arena.Google Scholar
  88. Peterson, G., Hayhoe, R., & Lu, Y. (2001). Education, culture, and identity in twentieth-century China. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Popenoe, D. (1988). Disturbing the nest: Family change and decline in modern societies. London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  90. Popenoe, D. (2008). War over the family. London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  91. Portelli, A. (2010). They say in Harlan county: An oral history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Ragin, C. C. (2009). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  93. Ridgeway, C. L., & Kricheli-Katz, T. (2013). Intersecting cultural beliefs in social relations: Gender, race, and class binds and freedoms. Gender and Society, 27(3), 294–318.Google Scholar
  94. Rodríguez-García, D. (2006). Mixed marriages and transnational families in the intercultural context: A case study of African–Spanish couples in Catalonia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32(3), 403–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ryan, L., & Webster, W. (2008). Gendering migration: Masculinity, femininity and ethnicity in post-war Britain. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  96. Smart, C. (2007). Personal life. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  97. Song, M. (2003). Choosing ethnic identity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  98. Song, M. (2009). Is intermarriage a good indicator of integration? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(2), 331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Spickard, P. R. (1991). Mixed blood: Intermarriage and ethnic identity in twentieth-century America. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  100. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (1994). Inconsistent self-views in the control identity model. Social Science Research, 23(3), 236–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Stets, J. E., & Turner, J. H. (2008). Handbook of the sociology of emotions. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  103. Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30(4), 558–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Stryker, S., & Statham, A. (1985). Symbolic interaction and role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, (vol. 1, pp. 311–378). Newbury: Random House.Google Scholar
  105. Suh, E. M. (2002). Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1378–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Talbot, M. M., Atkinson, K., & Atkinson, D. (2003). Language and power in the modern world. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Tam, S. M., Wong, W. C. A., & Wang, D. (2014). Gender and family in East Asia. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  109. Therborn, G. (2004). Between sex and power: Family in the world, 1900–2000. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  110. Therborn, G. (2013). The world: A Beginner’s guide. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  111. Thoits, P. A. (1983). Multiple identities and psychological well-being: A reformulation and test of the social isolation hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Thoits, P. A. (1986). Multiple identities: Examining gender and marital status differences in distress. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Tomkins, S. S. (1995). Exploring affect: The selected writings of Silvan S Tomkins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Turner, R. H. (1990). Role change. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1), 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Vaillant, G. E. (1977). Adaptation to life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  116. Vertovec, S. (2006). Migrant transnationalism and modes of transformation. International Migration Review, 38(3), 970–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  118. Walby, S. (2011). The future of feminism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  119. Walby, S., Armstrong, J., & Strid, S. (2012). Intersectionality: Multiple inequalities in social theory. Sociology, 46(2), 224–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Waters, M. C. (1990). Ethnic options: Choosing identities in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  121. Weber, M. (1978 [1922]). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  122. Werbner, P. (2013). Everyday multiculturalism: Theorising the difference between “intersectionality” and “multiple identities”. Ethnicities, 13(4), 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing difference. Gender and Society, 9(1), 8–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Whyte, M. K. (2005). Continuity and change in urban Chinese family life. The China Journal, 53, 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Whyte, M. K. (2010). One country, two societies: Rural-urban inequality in contemporary China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  127. Wikan, U. (2002). Generous betrayal: Politics of culture in the new Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  128. Williams, L. (2010). Global marriage: Cross-border marriage migration in global context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Wimmer, A. (2004). Does ethnicity matter? Everyday group formation in three Swiss immigrant neighbourhoods. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Wimmer, A. (2008). The making and unmaking of ethnic boundaries: A multilevel process theory. American Journal of Sociology, 113(4), 970–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Yan, Y. (2002). Courtship, love and premarital sex in a north China village. The China Journal, 48, 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Yan, Y. (2009). The individualization of Chinese society. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yang Hu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of EssexEssexUK

Personalised recommendations