Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding the Dominance and Advocacy of the Design-Oriented Research Approach in the Business Informatics Community: A History-Based Examination

  • Chapter
Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems

  • 1277 Accesses

Abstract

Information Systems (IS) is a scientific discipline with global reach that investigates the development, use, and impact of information and communication technologies (IT). In this article, we focus on historical investigation of one major scientific community within the larger IS discipline, namely that of Wirtschaftsinformatik (Business Informatics or BI). Business Informatics, which had its genesis in the 1960s, is now the dominant IS community in the German-speaking countries (Austria, Germany, Switzerland). This community is best characterized by its strong connections to industry and its concentration on engineering (e.g., Heinrich, 2005; Frank et al., 2008; Buhl et al., 2012). Thus, even though most BI scholars acknowledge that both research and development are equally important objectives of scientific enquiry, the focus of BI has been on the development of IT artefacts, and not on the theoretical investigation of IS behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arazy, O., Kumar, N. and Shapira, B. (2010). A Theory-Driven Design Framework for Social Recommender Systems, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 11(9): 455–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardelt, R.G. (2011). Geschichte der Wirtschaftsinformatik: Ein Instrument kritischer Selbstreflexion? Working Paper, Johannes Kepler University Linz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argarwal, R. and Lucas, H.C. (2005). The Information Systems Identity Crisis: Focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research, MIS Quarterly 29(3): 381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Back, A. (2001). Lexikon der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 4th edn, Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros, C.A. (1998). Autobiography: Narrative of transformation, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville, R., Lyytinen, K., Sambamurthy, V. and Straub, D. (2011). A Response to the Design-oriented Information Systems Research Memorandum, European Journal of Information Systems 20(1): 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R.W. (1999). Empirical Research in Information Systems: The practice of relevance, MIS Quarterly 23(1): 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R.W. (2003). The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties, MIS Quarterly 27(2): 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIFOA (1969). Zweites Memorandum Betriebsinformatikund Wirtschaftsinformatik als notwendige anwendungsbezogene Ergänzung einer Allgemeinen Informatik, elektronische datenverarbeitung 11(11): 544–548 (Reprinted in Wirtschaftsinformatik 2009, 51(1): 104–109).

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, R.O. (2006). On Theory-driven Design and Deployment of Collaboration Systems, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(7): 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhl, H.U., Müller, G., Fridgen, G. and Röglinger, M. (2012). Business and Information Systems Engineering: A complementary approach to information systems — What we can learn from the past and may conclude from present reflection on the future, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 13(4): 236–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Kelly, M. (2009). Origin of Computing, Scientific American 301(3): 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E.H. (1961). What is History? Cambridge: University of Cambridge & Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.M. (1997). Human-Computer Interaction: Psychology as a science of design, Annual Review of Psychology 48: 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.D. Jr. (2009). History and Management Practice and Thought: An autobiography, Journal of Management History 15(3): 236–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W.S. and Hirschheim, R. (2004). A Paradigmatic and Methodological Examination of Information Systems Research from 1991–2001, Information Systems Journal 14(3): 197–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortada, J.W. (2004). How Did Computing Go Global? The Need for an Answer and a Research Agenda, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 26(1): 53–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortada, J.W. (2008). Patterns and Practices in How Information Technology Spread around the World, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 30(4): 4–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T.H. and Markus, M.L. (1999). Rigor vs Relevance Revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud, MIS Quarterly 23(1): 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denning, P.J. (2005). Is Computer Science Science? Communications of the ACM 48(4): 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, J. (1952). Automation: The advent of the automatic factory, Princeton: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, U., Buhl, H.U., König, W., Krcmar, H., Mertens, P., Zmud, B. and Klein, H.K. (1997). German Perspectives on Information Systems: Research topics, methodological challenges, and patterns of exchange with IS practice, ICIS 1997 Proceedings, Paper 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, U., Schauer, C. and Wigand, R. (2008). Different Paths of Development of Two Information Systems Communities: A comparative study based on peer interviews, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 22(21): 391–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, S. and Jones, D. (2007). The Anatomy of a Design Theory, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(5): 312–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grochla, E. (1966). Automation und Organisation, Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E.C. (2000). From the Farm to Pioneering with Digital Control Computers: An autobiography, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 22(2): 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, B. (1961). Betriebswirtschaftliche Grundlagen der Automatisierten Datenverarbeitung, Freiburg i. Br.: Haufe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilmann, H. and Heinrich, L.J. (2006). Erkenntnisobjekte der Wirtschaftsinformatik, HMD — Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik 43(250): 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, L.J. (1975). Zum wissenschaftlichen Standort einer Betriebs- und Verwaltungsinformatik, Angewandte Informatik 17(7): 265–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, L.J. (1986). Wirtschaftsinformatik in Forschung und Ausbildung, Information Management 1(1): 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, L.J. (1988). Zeittafel zur Entwicklung der Wirtschaftsinformatik, in L. J. Heinrich and K. Kurbel (eds.) Studien- und Forschungsführer Wirtschaftsinformatik, 3rd edn, Berlin et al.: Springer, pp. 50–54.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, L.J. (1992). Zeittafel zur Entwicklung der Wirtschaftsinformatik, in P. Mertens et al. (eds.) Studien- und Forschungsführer Wirtschaftsinformatik, 4th edn, Berlin et al.: Springer, pp. 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, L.J. (1996). Geschichte der Wirtschaftsinformatik, in P. Mertens, D. Ehrenberg, J. Griese, L. J. Heinrich, K. Kurbel and P. Stahlknecht (eds.) Studienführer Wirtschaftsinformatik, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden: Vieweg, pp. 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, L.J. (1999). Geschichte der Wirtschaftsinformatik, in P. Mertens, D. Ehrenberg, P. Chamoni. J. Griese, L.J. Heinrich and K. Kurbel (eds.) Studienführer Wirtschaftsinformatik, 2nd edn, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden: Vieweg, pp. 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, L.J. (2002). Geschichte der Wirtschaftsinformatik, in P. Mertens, P. Chamoni, D. Ehrenberg, L. J. Heinrich, K. Kurbel (eds.) Studienführer Wirtschaftsinformatik, 3rd edn, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden: Vieweg, pp. 45–52.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, L.J. (2005). Forschungsmethodik einer Integrationsdisziplin: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Wirtschaftsinformatik, NTM — Internationale Zeitschrift für Geschichte und Ethik der Naturwissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 13(2): 104–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, L.J. (2011). Geschichte der Wirtschaftsinformatik: Entstehung und Entwicklung einer Wissenschaftsdisziplin, Heidelberg et al.: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, L.J., Heinzl, A. and Riedl, R. (2011). Wirtschaftsinformatik — Einführung und Grundlegung, 4th edn, Heidelberg et al.: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R. and Klein, H.K. (2003). Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4(10): 237–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khazanchi, D. and Munkvold, B.E. (2000). Is Information Systems a Science? An Inquiry into the Nature of the Information Systems Discipline, The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 31(3): 24–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, J.L. and Lyytinen, K. (2004). Reach and Grasp, MIS Quarterly 28(4): 539–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (2008). The Structure of the IS Discipline Reconsidered: Implications and reflections from a community of practice perspective, Information and Organization 18(4): 280–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König, W., Heinzl, A. and Poblotzki, A. von (1995). Die zentralen Forschungsgegenstände der Wirtschaftsinformatik in den nächsten zehn Jahren, Wirtschaftsinformatik 37(6): 558–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, W., Heinzl, A., Rumpf, M.-J. and Poblotzki, A. von (1996). Zur Entwicklung der Forschungsmethoden und Theoriekerne der Wirtschaftsinformatik: Eine kombinierte Delphi- und AHP-Untersuchung, in H. Heilmann, L.J. Heinrich and F. Roithmayr (eds.) Information Engineering, München/Wien: Oldenbourg, pp. 35–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: Introduction to its methodology, 2nd edn, Thousand Oaks/CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krusenstjern, B. von (1994). Was sind Selbstzeugnisse? Begriffskritische und quellenkundliche Überlegungen anhand von Beispielen aus dem 17. Jahrhundert, Historische Anthropologie/Kultur, Gesellschaft, Alltag 2(2): 462–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurbel, K. (ed.) (1993). Wirtschaftsinformatik ′93: Innovative Anwendungen, Technologie, integration, Berlin et al.: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurbel, K., Brenner, W., Chamoni, P., Frank, U., Mertens, P. and Roithmayr, F. (eds.) (2009). Studienführer Wirtschaftsinformatik 2009/2010, Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, F. (2000). The First Business Computer: A case study in user-driven innovation, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 22(3): 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, F. (2010). The Use of History in IS research: An opportunity missed, Journal of Information Technology 25(4): 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A.S. (1999). Rigor and Relevance in MIS Research: Beyond the approach of positivism alone, MIS Quarterly 23(1): 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimbach, T. (2008). The SAP Story: Evolution of SAP within the German software industry, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 30(4): 60–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lejeune, P. (1989). On Autobiography, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, S.J. and Margolis, S.E. (1995). Path Dependence, Lock-in, and History, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 11(1): 205–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K. and King, J.L. (2006). The Theoretical and Academic Legitimacy: A response to Professor Weber, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7(11): 714–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. (2000). Path Dependence in Historical Sociology, Theory and Society 29(4): 507–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M.S. (2005). The Histories of Computing(s), Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 30(2): 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, S.T. and Smith, G.F. (1995). Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology, Decision Support Systems 15(4): 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M.L., Majchrzak, A. and Gasser, L. (2002). A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes, MIS Quarterly 26(3): 179–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R.O., KcKenney, J.L. and Copeland, D.G. (1997a). An Historical Method for MIS Research: Steps and assumptions, MIS Quarterly 21(3): 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R.O., KcKenney, J.L. and Copeland, D.G. (1997b). Developing an Historical Tradition in MIS Research, MIS Quarterly 21(3): 257–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, P. (1966). Die zwischenbetriebliche Kooperation und Integration bei der automatisierten Datenverarbeitung, Meisenheim am Glan: Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, P. (1995). Wirtschaftsinformatik — Von den Moden zum trend, in König W. (ed.) Wirtschaftsinformatik ′95, Wettbewerbsfähigkeit — Innovation — Wirtschaftlichkeit, Heidelberg et al.: Springer, pp. 25–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neustadt, R.E. and May, E.R. (1986). Thinking in Time: The uses of history for decision makers, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. and Simon, H.A. (1976). Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and search, Communications of the ACM 19(3): 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Österle, H., Becker, J., Frank, U., Hess, T., Karagiannis, D., Krcmar, H., Loos, P., Mertens, P., Oberweis, A. and Sinz, E.J. (2011). Memorandum on Design-oriented Information Systems Research, European Journal of Information Systems 20(1): 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resch, A. and Schlögl, C. (2004). Die Wirtschaftsinformatik aus der Sicht ihres Hauptpublikationsorgans: Eine szientometrische Analyse der Zeitschrift Wirtschaftsinformatik/Angewandte Informatik, Wirtschaftsinformatik 46(4): 302–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlombs, C. (2010). Productivity Machines: Transatlantic transfers of computing technology and culture in the cold war, Dissertations available from ProQuest. Paper AAI3414208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahlknecht, P. and Hasenkamp, U. (2010). Einführung in die Wirtschaftsinformatik, 12th edn, Berlin et al.: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steininger, K., Riedl, R., Roithmayr, F. and Mertens, P. (2009). Fads and Trends in Business and Information Systems Engineering and Information Systems Research: A comparative literature analysis, Business & Information Systems Engineering 1(6): 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szyperski, N. and Müller-Böling, D. (1981). Zur technologischen Orientierung der empirischen Forschung, in E. Witte (ed.) Der praktische Nutzen empirischer Forschung, Tübingen: Mohr, pp. 159–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R. and El Sawy, O.A. (1992). Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS, Information Systems Research 3(1): 36–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1995). The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research, Information Systems Research 6(4): 376–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (2006). Doing Interpretive Research, European Journal of Information Systems 15(3): 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. (1987). Toward a Theory of Artifacts: A paradigmatic base for information systems research, Journal of Information Systems 1(2): 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. (2006). Reach and Grasp in the Debate over the IS Core: An empty hand? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7(10): 703–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, T. and Hess, T. (2007). Forschungsmethoden der Wirtschaftsinformatik: Eine empirische Untersuchung, Wirtschaftsinformatik 49(4): 280–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F. (2000). The Logic and Methodology of Science and Pseudoscience, Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, R., Krcmar, H., Sinz, E.J., Zelewski, S. and Hevner, A.R. (2009). What in Fact is Fundamental Research in Business and Information Systems Engineering, Business & Information Systems Engineering 1(2): 192–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WKWI, (ed.) (1994). Profil der Wirtschaftsinformatik, Wirtschaftsinformatik 36(1): 80–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgenannt, R. (1969). Was ist Wissenschaft?, Braunschweig: Vieweg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, W.A. (1995). Are We Scientists or Engineers? ACM Computing Surveys 27(1): 55–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Informatics — Information Engineering, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria

    Lutz J. Heinrich & René Riedl

Authors
  1. Lutz J. Heinrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. René Riedl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK

    Leslie P. Willcocks

  2. Oxford University, Oxford, UK

    Chris Sauer

  3. University of Missouri-St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA

    Mary C. Lacity

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Association for Information Technology Trust

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heinrich, L.J., Riedl, R. (2016). Understanding the Dominance and Advocacy of the Design-Oriented Research Approach in the Business Informatics Community: A History-Based Examination. In: Willcocks, L.P., Sauer, C., Lacity, M.C. (eds) Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29272-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation