Advertisement

Critical Perspectives on Information Systems: An Impression of the Research Landscape

  • Carole Brooke

Abstract

Klein and Hirschheim (1991) predicted that the future of information systems (IS) research would

… belong to methodologies that are able to combine a high level of formal rationality with a sufficient level of communicative rationality under emancipatory conditions (p. 15).

Keywords

Information System Critical Research Critical Perspective Emotional Labour Critical Realism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackroyd, S. and Thompson, P. (1999) Organizational Misbehaviour (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  2. Adam, A. (2002) Exploring the gender question in critical information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 17(2), 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvesson, M. and Deetz, S. (2000) Doing Critical Management Research (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  4. Boje, D. (1995) Stories of the storytelling organization. Academy of Management, 38(4), 997–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boje, D. (2001) Narrative Methods for Organizational and Communication Research (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  6. Brooke, C. (1994) Information technology and the quality gap. Employee Relations, 16(4), 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooke, C. (2001) Information systems in use: a representational perspective. TAMARA, 1(3), 39–52.Google Scholar
  8. Brooke, C. (2002a) Editorial: critical research in information systems: issue 1. Journal of Information Technology, 17(2) 45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooke, C. (2002b) What does it mean to be critical in IS research? Journal of Information Technology, 17(2), 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooke, C. and Maguire, S. (1998) Systems development: a restrictive practice? International Journal of Information Management, 18(3), 165–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis (Gower, Aldershot).Google Scholar
  12. Carrizosa, A. (2000) Enacting thinking spaces towards purposeful actions: an action research project. Paper presented to the World Congress of the Systems Science and the 44th Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, Toronto, Canada. CD-ROM.Google Scholar
  13. Carrizosa, A. (2002) ‘Platforms’ for critical systems practice: an organisation-based action research project. In 46th Conference of the International Society for the System Sciences, Janet K. Allen and Jennifer Wilby (eds.) International Society for the System Science/ISSS, 2–6 August 2002, Shanghai, China. CD-ROM.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, T. and Salaman, G. (1996) Telling tales: management consultancy as the art of storytelling. In Metaphors and Organisations, Grant, D. and Oswick, C. (eds) (Sage, London), pp. 166–84.Google Scholar
  15. Clegg, S.R. (2001) Changing Concepts of Power, Changing Concepts of Politics. Administrative Theory and Prascis, 23(2), 126–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper, R. (1990) Organization/Disorganization. In The Theory and Philosophy of Organizations, Hassard, J. and Pym, D. (eds) (Routledge, London), pp. 167–97.Google Scholar
  17. Flood, R.L. (1990) Liberating Systems Theory (Plenum, New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gabriel, Y. (2000) Storytelling in Organisations: Facts, Fictions and Fantasies (Oxford University Press, Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gregory, W. (1996) Discordant pluralism: a new strategy for critical systems thinking. Systems Practice, 9(6), 605–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Habermas, J. (1984a) The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (Heinemann, London) (translated by T. McCarthy).Google Scholar
  21. Habermas, J. (1984b) The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason (Heinemann, London) (translated by T. McCarthy).Google Scholar
  22. Harrington, J. (1995) Paradigms Lost and Gained: Are We the Victims of a Paradigmatic Hegemony? (Newcastle Business School Working Paper Series, University of Northumbria).Google Scholar
  23. Hassard, J. and Parker, M. (1993) Postmodernism and Organisations (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  24. Hochschild, A.R. (1983) The Managed Heart: The Commercialisation of Human Feeling (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
  25. Jackson, M.C. (1997) Pluralism in systems thinking and practice. In Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies, Mingers, J. and Gill, A. (eds) (John Wiley, Chichester), pp. 347–77.Google Scholar
  26. Jackson, M.C. (2000) Systems Approaches to Management (Kluwer, New York).Google Scholar
  27. Jackson, N. and Carter, P. (1991) In defence of paradigm incommensurability. Organization Studies, 12(1), 109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (1991) Rationality concepts in information systems development methodologies. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 1(2), 157–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lash, S. (1988) Discourse or figure? Postmodernism as a regime of signification. Theory, Culture and Society, 5(2), 311–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lash, S. (2002) Critique of Information (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  31. Lyytinen, K. and Klein, H.K. (1985) The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas as a basis for a theory of information systems. In Mumford, E., Hirscheim, R., Fitzgerald, G. and Wood-Harper, T. (eds) Research Methods in Information Systems. (Elsevier Science, North-Holland), pp. 219–36.Google Scholar
  32. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964) The Primacy of Perception (Northwestern University Press) (collection edited by J.M. Edie).Google Scholar
  33. Ormerod, R. and Mingers, J. (2002) Viewpoint. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53, 347–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parker, M. and Cooper, R. (1998) Cyborganization: cinema as nervous system. In Organization Representation, Hassard, J. and Holliday, R. (eds) (Sage, London), pp. 201–28.Google Scholar
  35. Pfeffer, J. (1981) Power in Organisations (Pitman, Marshfield).Google Scholar
  36. Power, M. and Laughlin, R. (1992) Critical Theory in Accounting. In Critical Management Studies, Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H. (eds) (Sage, London), pp. 113–35.Google Scholar
  37. Reed, M. (1993) Organizations and modernity: continuity and discontinuity in organization theory. In Postmodernism and Organisations, Hassard, J. and Parker, M. (eds) (Sage, London), pp. 163–82.Google Scholar
  38. Remenyi, D. (2002) As the first 50 years of computing draw to an end…: what kind of society do we want? Journal of Information Technology, 17(1), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saravanamuthu, K. (2002) Information technology and ideology. Journal of Information Technology, 17(2), 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sauer, C. and Willcocks, L. (2002) Editorial: winners and losers in the digital divide. Journal of Information Technology, 17(1), 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scarbrough, H. and Corbett, M. (1992) Technology and Organization: Power, Meaning and Design (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  42. Smith, S. (1989) Information technology in banks: Taylorization or human-centred systems? In Computers in the Human Context: Information Technology, Productivity and People, Forester, T. (ed.) (Basil Blackwell, Oxford), pp. 377–90.Google Scholar
  43. Swan, J. and Scarbrough, H. (2001) Editorial: knowledge management: concepts and controversies. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 913–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taket, L. and White, A. (2000) Partnership and Participation: Decision-making in the Multiagency Setting (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester).Google Scholar
  45. Taylor, S. (1998) Emotional labour and the new workplace. In Workplaces of the Future, Thompson, P. and Warhurst, C. (eds) (Macmillan Business, Basingstoke), pp. 84–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thompson, P. and McHugh, D. (2002) Work Organisations: A Critical Introduction, 3rd edn (Palgrave, Basingstoke).Google Scholar
  47. Ulrich, W. (2000) Reflective practice in the civil society: the contribution of critically systemic thinking. Reflective Practice, 1(2), 247–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ulrich, W. (2001a) A philosophical staircase for information systems definition, design and development: a discursive approach to reflective practice in ISD (part 1). Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 3(3), 55–84.Google Scholar
  49. Ulrich, W. (2001b) Critically systemic discourse: a discusive approach to reflective practice in ISD (Part 2). Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 3(3), 85–106.Google Scholar
  50. Ulrich, W. (2002) Personal communication.Google Scholar
  51. White, A. and Taket, L. (1997) Continuing multimethodology as metamethodology: working towards pragmatic pluralism. In Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies, Mingers, J. and Gill, A. (eds) (John Wiley, Chichester), pp. 379–405.Google Scholar
  52. Willmott, H. (1993) Breaking the paradigm mentality. Information and Organization, 14(5), 681–719.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Information Technology Trust 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carole Brooke
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Business and ManagementUniversity of LincolnBrayford PoolUK

Personalised recommendations